Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/641,749

LOCKING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Apr 22, 2024
Examiner
FORD, DARRELL CHRISTOPHER
Art Unit
3726
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Magna Böco GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
423 granted / 558 resolved
+5.8% vs TC avg
Strong +40% interview lift
Without
With
+40.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
590
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
38.8%
-1.2% vs TC avg
§102
23.7%
-16.3% vs TC avg
§112
35.5%
-4.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 558 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Receipt is acknowledged of Applicant’s Response, dated 22 September 2025, which papers have been made of record. Claims 25-51 are currently presented for examination, of which claims 25-40 and 48-51 have been withdrawn from consideration. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of the invention of Group II, claims 41-47, in the reply filed on 22 September 2025 is acknowledged. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: Page 10, line 11, as filed, recites “The invention also relates to a fastening device according to claim 21.” The claims are subject to renumbering and cancelation, such that references thereto are not instructresses to one having ordinary skill in the art. The examiner notes that the preliminary amendment filed 8 November 2024 cancels several other references to the claims. To the best of the examiner’s understanding, the request to cancel the paragraph beginning at line 9 will not necessarily be interpreted by the Mail Room to include line 11, which appears to be a separate paragraph. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 41-47 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 41 recites “at least one opening” at line 4 and “in the opening” at line 5. It is unclear whether, where there are multiple openings in the “at least one opening” a striker portion must be inserted into each opening, in line 5. Claims 42-47 each depend from claim 41, and therefore are rejected for at least the reasons presented above with respect to claim 41. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 41-42 and 45-46 Claim(s) 41-42 and 45-46 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by United States Patent Application Publication 2020/0299994 to Paskonis (hereinafter “Paskonis”). Regarding claim 41, Paskonis discloses a method for producing a locking device for a motor vehicle, comprising the steps of: a) providing a striker (100; see Fig. 4); b) providing a mounting plate (200) having at least one opening (210); c) arranging an axial portion (leg 110 or 120) of the striker in the opening (see Fig. 5 and paragraph [0028]); and d) deforming material regions of the mounting plate (see paragraph [0031]; edge of the bore of the aperture in the base plate is deformed by the bottom taper) at a mouth of the opening (210) against an outer circumferential surface (see Fig. 4 and paragraph [0031]) of the axial portion (leg 110 illustrated in Fig. 4a) so that the material regions contact the outer surface (see paragraph [0031]; tapers 142, 152 mate with sidewalls of aperture). Regarding claim 42, Paskonis discloses the limitations of claim 41, and further Paskonis discloses including step d) so that an annular contact of the material regions (edge of the aperture 210) with the outer circumferential surface (tapers 142, 152 of legs) is achieved (see Fig. 4a). Regarding claim 45, Paskonis discloses the limitations of claim 41, and further Paskonis discloses further comprising, following step d) (step d) performed in paragraph [0031]), the step of: e) deforming the striker (100) to achieve a radial expansion at an axial region (160; see paragraph [0032] following paragraph [0031]) immediately adjacent to the axial portion and immediately adjacent to the material regions (see Fig. 4a). Regarding claim 46, Paskonis discloses the limitations of claim 45, and further Paskonis discloses including providing, to perform step e), a striker (100) that comprises a radial step (140, 150; see paragraph [0031]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 43-44 and 47 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure United States Patent Application Publication 2009/0079208 to Mizuno et al. teaches a method for forming a striker and plate assembly, including at least one caulking step. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DARRELL C. FORD whose telephone number is (313)446-6515. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30 AM to 5:15 PM, Monday to Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sunil K Singh can be reached at (571) 272-3460. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /D.C.F/Examiner, Art Unit 3726 /SARANG AFZALI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3726 10/15/2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 22, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600014
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR HOLDING SUBSTRATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12546359
SEALED FASTENER CAP AND RELATED METHOD OF MANUFACTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12539741
METHOD FOR SETTING AUTOMOTIVE GLASS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12533724
FITTING CRIMPING TOOL WITH CHECK GAUGE MOUNT
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12529252
METHOD OF INSTALLING A MODULAR HINGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+40.0%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 558 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month