Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/641,892

ORNAMENT FOR ATTACHMENT ON APPAREL

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 22, 2024
Examiner
KANE, KATHARINE GRACZ
Art Unit
3732
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
47%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 8m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 47% of resolved cases
47%
Career Allow Rate
296 granted / 631 resolved
-23.1% vs TC avg
Strong +45% interview lift
Without
With
+45.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
61 currently pending
Career history
692
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
48.6%
+8.6% vs TC avg
§102
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
§112
18.1%
-21.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 631 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-4 are being treated on the merits. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sglurgup (Website: Christmas Tree Guitar Pick Ornaments : 3 Steps - Instructables 2010). Regarding Claim 1, Sglurgup discloses an article comprising (Step 2):a substantially flat front-facing surface portion (first figure on page, guitar pick) and an opposite-facing flat back-facing surface portion (first figure on page, guitar pick; the back), where the front-facing surface portion and the back-facing surface portion are substantially parallel one with respect to the other (first figure on page, guitar pick), and where the front-facing surface portion and the back-facing surface portion extend to and are bounded by a first, a second and a third edge (edge of the triangular guitar pick), where each of the first, second and third edges are arcuate (first figure on page, guitar pick) and are joined end-to-end at a first apex, a second apex, and a third apex (first figure on page, guitar pick); and a through-hole extending through and from the front-facing surface portion, to and through the opposite-facing surface and proximate one of the first, second, and third apexes (first figure on page, guitar pick). Regarding Claim 2, Sglurfup discloses two of the first, the second and the third edges are equal in length (Figures, a guitar pick has two equal lengths) Regarding Claim 3, Sglurgup discloses the first, the second and the third edges are bull nose edges (first figure on page, guitar pick). Regarding Claim 4 Sglurgup discloses a lanyard extending through the through-hole (hanging on Christmas tree with string, wire or hook) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1, 2 & 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fanjoy (USPN 6,434,870). Regarding Claim 1, Fanjoy discloses an article (12) comprising: a substantially flat front-facing surface portion (Figure 2) and an opposite-facing flat back-facing surface portion (Figure 3), where the front-facing surface portion and the back-facing surface portion are substantially parallel one with respect to the other (Figures 1-3), and where the front-facing surface portion and the back-facing surface portion extend to and are bounded by a first, a second and a third edge (edges, see annotated Figure 2 below), and a through-hole (44) extending through and from the front-facing surface portion, to and through the opposite-facing surface and proximate one of the first, second, and third apexes (Figures 1-3). Fanjoy does not specifically disclose where each of the first, second and third edges are arcuate and are joined end-to-end at a first apex, a second apex, and a third apex. However, Fanjoy discloses various shapes can be used for the article (Col. 3, lines 27-28). It, however, would have been an obvious matter of design choice to one skilled in the art at before the effective filing date to construct the article having a triangular-type shape, since applicant has not disclosed that such solve any stated problem or is anything more than one of numerous shapes or configurations a person ordinary skill in the art would find obvious for the purpose of providing an article. Regarding Claim 2, the modified Fanjoy discloses two of the first, the second and the third edges are equal in length (Col. 3, lines 27-28, triangle-type shape). Regarding Claim 4, Fanjoy discloses a lanyard (14) extending through the through-hole (Figure 1). PNG media_image1.png 268 528 media_image1.png Greyscale Claims 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fanjoy (USPN 6,434,870) in view of Akarapu (US 2013/0288010). Regarding Claim 3, Fanjoy does not disclose the first, the second and the third edges are bull nose edges. However, Akarapu discloses the use of bull nose edges for strength (Figure 1 & Para. 57-58). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to include a bull nose edge, as taught by Akarapu, to the article of Fanjoy in order to increase strength. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KATHARINE KANE whose telephone number is (571)272-3398. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9am-6pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, KHOA HUYNH can be reached at 571-272-4888. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KATHARINE G KANE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3732
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 22, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 19, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jun 10, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 12, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Sep 16, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 16, 2025
Notice of Allowance
Dec 09, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599185
PROTECTIVE KNEE PAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12564247
ARTICLE OF FOOTWEAR WITH REEL CLOSURE AND SLIDABLE EYELET
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12538960
FOOT SUPPORT SYSTEMS INCLUDING FLUID MOVEMENT CONTROLLERS AND ADJUSTABLE FOOT SUPPORT PRESSURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12478118
Adapter System For Vest Closure Mechanisms
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 25, 2025
Patent 12471670
SOLE STRUCTURE HAVING A FLUID-FILLED CHAMBER FOR AN ARTICLE OF FOOTWEAR
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 18, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
47%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+45.4%)
3y 8m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 631 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month