Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/641,992

CAMERA SYSTEM INCLUDING AT LEAST TWO LIGHT SOURCES

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 22, 2024
Examiner
FULLER, RODNEY EVAN
Art Unit
2852
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Kubota Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
1105 granted / 1319 resolved
+15.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1343
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§103
30.8%
-9.2% vs TC avg
§102
40.4%
+0.4% vs TC avg
§112
9.2%
-30.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1319 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I (Claims 1014 and 18-20) in the reply filed on 10/07/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 15-17 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 10/07/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Bunce, et al. (US 5,598,007). Regarding claim 1, Bunce discloses “a camera (Fig. 4, ref.# 42); a first light source (Fig. 4, ref.# 60B); and a second light source (Fig. 4, ref.# 60B), wherein a main optical axis of the first light source intersects with a main optical axis of the second light source at an intersection point (Fig. 4, crossing of ref.# 64B, 66B), and the intersection point is not located within a depth of field of the camera (Fig. 4, DOF located near location of do).” Regarding claim 2, Bunce discloses “wherein the intersection point (Fig. 4, crossing of ref.# 64B, 66B) is located closer to the camera (Fig. 4, ref.# 42) than a depth of field of the camera (Fig. 4, DOF located near location of do).” Regarding claim 3, Bunce discloses “wherein a distance between the camera (Fig. 4, ref.# 42) and the first light source (Fig. 4, ref.# 60B) is equal or substantially equal to a distance between the camera and the second light source (Fig. 4, ref.# 62B).” Regarding claim 4, Bunce discloses “wherein a main optical axis (Fig. 4, ref.# 46) of the camera intersects with the intersection point (Fig. 4, crossing of ref.# 64B, 66B).” Regarding claim 5, Bunce discloses “wherein: the camera is a line scan camera, and an axis passing through the first light source and the second light source is parallel or substantially parallel to a scanning direction of the camera.” (column 1, lines 40-42: detector array (Chandler EPA0524029A2 also discloses a line scan camera; column 6, line 33: detector array 45) Regarding claim 6, Bunce discloses “wherein the axis passing through the first light source and the second light source also passes through the camera.” (See Fig. 4) Regarding claim 7, Bunce discloses “a plate (Fig. 8, ref.# 111: platform), wherein each of the camera (Fig. 9, ref.# 45(, the first light source (Fig. 8, ref.# 108), and the second light source (Fig. 8, ref.# 108) is fixed to the plate.” Regarding claim 8, Bunce discloses “wherein: the first light source is fixed to a first end of the plate, the second light source is fixed to a second end of the plate, and the camera is fixed to a middle portion of the plate.” (See Fig. 8) Regarding claim 9, Bunce discloses “wherein: the camera is a line scan camera, and the plate is movable along a scanning direction of the camera.” (Chandler EPA0524029A2 also discloses a line scan camera; column 6, line 33: detector array 45) Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10-14 and 18-20 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Lee, eta l. (US 2024/0126092) and Tsikkos, et al. (US 2008/0128508) teach a camera; a first light source; and a second light source, wherein a main optical axis of the first light source intersects with a main optical axis of the second light source at an intersection point, and the intersection point is not located within a depth of field of the camera. Armstrong, et al. (US 2017/0186183), Braun (US 5,142,299) and Tusting (US 4,707,094) teach a camera; a first light source; and a second light source, wherein a main optical axis of the first light source intersects with a main optical axis of the second light source at an intersection point, and the intersection point is located within a depth of field of the camera. Chandler (EP 0524029) is cited by Bunce and teaches a line scan camera. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RODNEY FULLER whose telephone number is (571)272-2118. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 am - 4:30 pm, Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephanie Bloss can be reached at 571-272-3555. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RODNEY E FULLER/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2852 February 24, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 22, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12585312
Meta-Optics Camera Assembly for Use With Information Handling Systems
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584984
AI-POWERED HISTOLOGICAL FINGERPRINTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585171
IN-VEHICLE CAMERA REAR CASE AND IN-VEHICLE CAMERA CASE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578292
SENSOR ELEMENT FOR TESTING A DATA CARRIER HAVING A SPIN RESONANCE FEATURE, DIVIDING METHOD, MOUNTING METHOD AND TESTING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12572054
A CAMERA MODULE WITH A LENS DRIVER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+8.6%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1319 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month