Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/642,087

Connector Structure, Fitting Position Guarantee Lock, And First Connector

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 22, 2024
Priority
May 17, 2023 — JP 2023-081737
Examiner
FIGUEROA, FELIX O
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Yazaki Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
72%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
537 granted / 927 resolved
-2.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
980
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
56.9%
+16.9% vs TC avg
§102
34.1%
-5.9% vs TC avg
§112
7.0%
-33.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 927 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.84(l). Every line, number, and letter must be durable, clean, black (except for color drawings), sufficiently dense and dark, and uniformly thick and well- defined. The weight of all lines and letters must be heavy enough to permit adequate reproduction. This requirement applies to all lines however fine, to shading, and to lines representing cut surfaces in sectional views. Lines and strokes of different thicknesses may be used in the same drawing where different thicknesses have a different meaning. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 4 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ohfuku (US 10,305,221). Regarding claim 1, Ohfuku discloses a connector structure comprising: a first connector (15); a second connector (13) configured to be fitted with the first connector; and a fitting position guarantee lock (21) attached to the second connector in a manner of being slidable in a fitting direction (left to right in Fig. 4) of the first connector and the second connector, wherein the first connector includes a first locking portion (33) and a second locking portion (34) that protrude to both sides in a protrusion direction (vertically in Fig. 4) intersecting the fitting direction, wherein the second connector includes: a first arm (53) whose distal end is flexible in the protrusion direction, and a third locking portion (55) provided at the distal end of the first arm and configured to ride over the first locking portion and to be engaged with the first locking portion when the first connector and the second connector are fitted to each other, and wherein the fitting position guarantee lock includes: a second arm (91) whose distal end is flexible in the protrusion direction, a fourth locking portion (93) provided at the distal end of the second arm and configured to ride over the third locking portion and to be engaged with the third locking portion after the third locking portion rides over the first locking portion and is engaged with the first locking portion, a third arm (99) whose distal end is flexible in the protrusion direction, and a fifth locking portion (101) provided at the distal end of the third arm and configured to ride over the second locking portion and to be engaged with the second locking portion at a final locking position where the fourth locking portion rides over the third locking portion and is engaged with the third locking portion. Regarding claim 4, Ohfuku discloses a fitting position guarantee lock (21) attached to a second connector (13) in a manner of being slidable in a fitting direction of a first connector and the second connector, the fitting position guarantee lock comprising: a second arm (91) whose distal end is flexible in a protrusion direction intersecting the fitting direction; a fourth locking portion (93) provided at the distal end of the second arm, and configured to, after a third locking portion provided at a distal end of a first arm that is flexible in the protrusion direction of the second connector rides over a first locking portion protruding toward one side in the protrusion direction of the first connector and is engaged with the first locking portion, ride over the third locking portion and be engaged with the third locking portion (intended use); a third arm (99) whose distal end is flexible in the protrusion direction; and a fifth locking portion (101) provided at the distal end of the third arm, and configured to ride over a second locking portion protruding toward the other side in the protrusion direction of the first connector and to be engaged with the second locking portion at a final locking position where the fourth locking portion rides over the third locking portion and is engaged with the third locking portion (intended use). Regarding claim 5, Ohfuku discloses a first connector (15) to be fitted with a second connector to which a fitting position guarantee lock is slidably attached, the first connector comprising a first locking portion (33) and a second locking portion (34) protruding to both sides in a protrusion direction (vertically in Fig. 4) intersecting a fitting direction of the first connector and the second connector, and configured to be engaged with a locking portion that is provided at a distal end of a flexible arm in the protrusion direction of the fitting position guarantee lock slidably attached to the second connector (intended use). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2 and 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ohfuku in view of Nishiyama (US 10,862,243). Regarding claim 2, Ohfuku discloses substantially the claimed invention except for the second locking portion provided with a second inclined surface. Nishiyama teaches a second locking portion (35) provided with a first inclined surface (36) whose protrusion height increases toward a first connector side in the fitting direction, and a second inclined surface (37) that is adjacent to the first connector side of the first inclined surface and whose protrusion height decreases toward the first connector side in the fitting direction, and wherein, when the third locking portion rides over the first locking portion, the fifth locking portion is in contact with the second inclined surface (Fig. 13C). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the invention was effectively filed to use a second inclined surface, as taught by Nishiyama, in order to provide a smoother connection and an easy withdrawal of the third locking portion. Regarding claim 3, Nishiyama teaches the first connector including a first rib (not labeled, lower rib above 37 in Fig. 1) extending in the fitting direction, wherein the fitting position guarantee lock has a rib insertion groove (not labeled, lower side groove in Figs. 6A-C) into which the first rib is inserted and that guides the first connector in the fitting direction, and wherein a second rib (not labeled, protrusion inside lower side groove in Figs. 6B-C) configured to come into contact with the first rib at the final locking position is provided in the rib insertion groove. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the invention was effectively filed to use a rib and groove arrangement, as taught by Nishiyama, in order to help guide and stabilize insertion of the first connector. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FELIX O FIGUEROA whose telephone number is (571)272-2003. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-6pm. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee Luebke can be reached at (571)727-2009. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FELIX O FIGUEROA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 22, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12712318
CONNECTOR SYSTEM HAVING KEYED MATING
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12712316
ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR HAVING A CAM SLIDE CONTACT LIFTER
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12706420
CONNECTOR INCLUDING A DISENGAGEMENT FEATURE
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12695227
CONNECTOR
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12690149
CARD HOLDER APPARATUS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
72%
With Interview (+14.5%)
2y 9m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 927 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month