Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/642,102

SLIDABLE PANE SYSTEM, WINDOW, DOOR, AND INSTALLATION METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 22, 2024
Priority
Apr 24, 2023 — provisional 63/461,347
Examiner
PONCIANO, PATRICK BERNAS
Art Unit
3634
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Corning Incorporated
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
2-3
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
52 granted / 90 resolved
+5.8% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
134
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
82.7%
+42.7% vs TC avg
§102
9.8%
-30.2% vs TC avg
§112
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 90 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office Action is in response to the claims filed on 10/28/2025. Claims 1, 3-6, 16-17, 19, and 21-32 are currently pending. Claims 5-6, 17, 27-28, and 30 are withdrawn as they are directed to the non-elected species of the application. Claims 2, 7-15, 18, and 20 are cancelled. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I and Species I in the reply filed on 07/09/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 5-6 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Species II and Species IV, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. The alternative limitations “a conductive helical spring, a conductive rotary spring, a conductive telescopic arm assembly” on lines 2-3 of claim 19 are also not examined as they are directed to the non-elected Species VI and Species V. Claim 19 was interpreted as “wherein, when the slidable pane system comprises the collectable wire, the collectable wire includes a winding spool”. Claims 27-28 and 30 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 07/09/2025. Claim Objections Claims 1, 24, and 29 are objected to because of the following informalities: In line 7 of claim 1, “to transmit at least one of the at least one” should read --to transmit at least one of a--. In lines 6 and 7 of claim 24, “the slidable pane” should read --the translatable pane--. Note that this issue is also present in claim 29. Appropriate correction is required. Above provides non-limiting examples, the applicant(s) must find and correct all issues similar to those discussed above. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 19 and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Mullins et al. (US 10678103) (hereinafter “Mullins”). Claim 19 (Mullins discloses) A slidable pane system (950; figure 9E) adapted to receive at least one of at least one signal or power from a driver (910), the slidable pane system comprising: a slidable pane (900m) having an electrically adjustable optical characteristic in response to at least one signal (Mullins’ invention is directed to electrochromic devices; lines 11-37 of col. 5; an embodiment of Mullins discloses the electrically adjustable optical characteristic is responsive via a signal from a controller 910; Excerpt 1 from col. 20 below); and one of a (i) a collectable wire coupled between the slidable pane and the driver or (ii) a conductive track (955; figure 9E) defining a sliding path of the slidable pane (longer dashed arrow above the assembly in figure 9E) and providing a conductive path between the driver and the slidable pane (figure 9E; note that the limitation ‘one of a (i) or (ii)’ was interpreted such that the claims are only requiring one of the two options between (i) or (ii) therefore this rejection was only rejecting option (ii)), wherein, when the slidable pane system comprises the collectable wire, the collectable wire includes at least one of a conductive helical spring, a conductive rotary spring, a conductive telescopic arm assembly, or a winding spool (As the limitations “wherein, when the slidable pane system comprises the collectable wire…” are directed to the alternative limitation [i.e., option (i)] and the other alternative [option (ii)] was chosen for examination and art application for claim 1, the further limitations of the unselected alternative limitation will not be addressed and these limitations are also rejected with claim 1). Claim 23 (Mullins discloses) The slidable pane system of claim 19, wherein the collectable wire provides the conductive path between the driver and the slidable pane, and the collectable wire comprises a collectable conductive wire coated with external insulation (As the limitations of claim 23 are directed to an alternative limitation [i.e., option (i)] and the other alternative [option (ii)] was chosen for examination and art application for claim 1, the further limitations of the unselected alternative limitation will not be addressed and claim 23 is rejected with claim 1). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 3-4, 16, 21, 24-26, 29, and 31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mullins in view of Kim (KR 102146965). Claim 1 (Mullins discloses) A slidable pane system (950; figure 9E), comprising: a slidable pane (900m) having an electrically adjustable optical characteristic in response to at least one signal (Mullins’ invention is directed to electrochromic devices; lines 11-37 of col. 5; an embodiment of Mullins discloses the electrically adjustable optical characteristic is responsive via a signal from a controller 910; Excerpt 1 from col. 20 below); at least one track (955) defining a sliding path of the slidable pane (longer dashed arrow above the assembly in figure 9E); a conductor (952) including a collectable conductive wire coated with external insulation (952 is disclosed as a ribbon cable which is known in the art to have a collectable conductive wire coated with external insulation; also see source below discussing the insulation in ribbon cables), the conductor having an adjustable length along the sliding path of the slidable pane and electrically coupled to the slidable pane to transmit at least one of the at least one signal or power to the slidable pane (Excerpt 1 and Excerpt 2 from col. 22 below). Mullins fails to disclose a first spool, wherein a first portion of the collectable conductive wire is wound around the first spool. (However, Kim teaches) A slidable pane system (Kim figures 3A-3B), comprising: a first spool (11a), wherein a first portion (portion of the wire that is wound around the spool 11a) of a collectable wire (42) is wound around the first spool (Kim figure 3A). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to provide the pane system of Mullins with the spool of Kim, with a reasonable expectation of success, for the predictable and expected benefits of preventing slacking of the conductive wire therefore protecting it from getting caught or entangling which can cause serious damage to the system. PNG media_image1.png 127 502 media_image1.png Greyscale Excerpt 1 PNG media_image2.png 75 454 media_image2.png Greyscale Excerpt 2 PNG media_image3.png 187 918 media_image3.png Greyscale Source: https://falconerelectronics.com/ribbon-cables-uses/#:~:text=What%20are%20Ribbon%20Cables,that%20can%20insulate%20the%20conductors. Claim 3 (Mullins, as modified above, discloses) The slidable pane system of claim 1. Modified Mullins fails to disclose wherein the first spool is positioned within a housing storing at least a part of the collectable conductive wire within the housing. (However, Kim teaches) wherein a first spool (11a; Kim figures 1-3A) is positioned within a housing (F; best seen in Kim figure 2) storing at least a part of a collectable wire (42) within the housing. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to provide the system of modified Mullins with the housing of Kim, with a reasonable expectation of success, for the predictable and expected benefits of protecting and covering the conductive parts which also prevents electrocuting passengers or users. Claim 4 (Mullins, as modified above, discloses) The slidable pane system of claims 3, wherein the housing is disposed spaced away from the slidable pane (this is taught in light of the combination above; also see the slidable pane of Kim in Kim figures 1-3A). Claim 16 (Mullins, as modified above, discloses) The slidable pane system of claim 1, wherein the optical characteristic includes at least one of a transparency or color of the slidable pane (disclosed in at least lines 20-25 of col. 5 and lines 38-67 of col. 5 to lines 1-2 of col. 6; also see figure 1). Claim 21 (Mullins, as modified above, discloses) The slidable pane system of claim 1, wherein the first spool is biased (Partial Annotated figure 3A below; note that “biased” was interpreted as an adjective --slanting obliquely; diagonal--) to wind extra portions of the collectable conductive wire around the first spool during a sliding movement of the slidable pane along the sliding path (Partial Annotated figure 3A below). PNG media_image4.png 469 478 media_image4.png Greyscale Partial Annotated figure 3A Claim 24 (Mullins discloses) A translatable pane system (950; figure 9E), comprising: a translatable pane (900m) having an electrically adjustable optical characteristic in response to at least one signal (Mullins’ invention is directed to electrochromic devices; lines 11-37 of col. 5; an embodiment of Mullins discloses the electrically adjustable optical characteristic is responsive via a signal from a controller 910; Excerpt 1 from col. 20 above); at least one track (955) defining a translating path of the translatable pane (longer dashed arrow above the assembly in figure 9E); a conductor (952) including a collectable conductive wire coated with external insulation (952 is disclosed as a ribbon cable which is known in the art to have a collectable conductive wire coated with external insulation; also see source above discussing the insulation in ribbon cables), the collectable conductive wire electrically coupled to the [translatable] pane to transmit at least one of the at least one signal or power to the [translatable] pane (Excerpt 1 and Excerpt 2 from col. 22 above). Mullins fails to disclose a first spool, wherein a first portion of the collectable conductive wire is wound around the first spool. (However, Kim teaches) A slidable pane system (Kim figures 3A-3B), comprising: a first spool (11a), wherein a first portion (portion of the wire that is wound around the spool 11a) of a collectable wire (42) is wound around the first spool (Kim figure 3A). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to provide the pane system of Mullins with the spool of Kim, with a reasonable expectation of success, for the predictable and expected benefits of preventing slacking of the conductive wire therefore protecting it from getting caught or entangling which can cause serious damage to the system. Claim 25 (Mullins, as modified above, discloses) The translatable pane system of claim 24. Modified Mullins fails to disclose wherein the first spool is positioned within a housing storing at least a part of the collectable conductive wire within the housing. (However, Kim teaches) wherein a first spool (11a; Kim figures 1-3A) is positioned within a housing (F; best seen in Kim figure 2) storing at least a part of a collectable wire (42) within the housing. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to provide the system of modified Mullins with the housing of Kim, with a reasonable expectation of success, for the predictable and expected benefits of protecting and covering the conductive parts which also prevents electrocuting passengers or users. Claim 26 (Mullins, as modified above, discloses) The translatable pane system of claims 25, wherein the housing is disposed spaced away from the translatable pane (this is taught in light of the combination above; also see the slidable pane of Kim in Kim figures 1-3A). Claim 29 (Mullins, as modified above, discloses) The translatable pane system of claim 24, wherein the optical characteristic includes at least one of a transparency or color of the [translatable] pane (disclosed in at least lines 20-25 of col. 5 and lines 38-67 of col. 5 to lines 1-2 of col. 6; also see figure 1). Claim 31 (Mullins, as modified above, discloses) The translatable pane system of claim 24, wherein the first spool is biased (Partial Annotated figure 3A above; note that “biased” was interpreted as an adjective --slanting obliquely; diagonal--) to wind extra portions of the collectable conductive wire around the first spool during a sliding movement of the translatable pane along the translating path (Partial Annotated figure 3A above). Claims 22 and 32 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mullins in view of Kim, as applied to claims 1, 3-4, 16, 21, 24-26, 29, and 31 above, in further view of Kletzli et al. (US 11533903) (hereinafter “Kletzli”). Claim 22 (Mullins, as modified above, discloses) The slidable pane system of claim 1. Modified Mullins fails to disclose wherein the collectable conductive wire comprises a self-retractive collectable conductive wire configured to promote winding of extra portions of the collectable conductive wire around the first spool during a sliding movement of the slidable pane along the sliding path. (However, Kletzli teaches) wherein a collectable wire (cable discussed on lines 21-25 of col. 3) comprises a self-retractive collectable wire (via clock spring; lines 21-25 of col. 3) configured to promote winding of extra portions of the collectable wire around a first spool (inner spool discussed on lines 21-25 of col. 3). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to provide the conductive wire and first spool of modified Mullins with the clock spring to provide self-retracting feature to the wire as taught by Kletzli, with a reasonable expectation of success, for automatic winding of the wire therefore preventing slack and protecting the wire from getting damaged. Claim 32 (Mullins, as modified above, discloses) The translatable pane system of claim 24. Modified Mullins fails to disclose wherein the collectable conductive wire comprises a self-retractive collectable conductive wire configured to promote winding of extra portions of the collectable conductive wire around the first spool during a translating movement of the translatable pane along the translating path. (However, Kletzli teaches) wherein a collectable wire (cable discussed on lines 21-25 of col. 3) comprises a self-retractive collectable wire (via clock spring; lines 21-25 of col. 3) configured to promote winding of extra portions of the collectable wire around a first spool (inner spool discussed on lines 21-25 of col. 3). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to provide the conductive wire and first spool of modified Mullins with the clock spring to provide self-retracting feature to the wire as taught by Kletzli, with a reasonable expectation of success, for automatic winding of the wire therefore preventing slack and protecting the wire from getting damaged. Response to Arguments Applicant’s amendments directed to the specification objection was considered and the objection was withdrawn. Applicant's arguments filed on 10/28/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that “Mullins fails to disclose "a first spool in the housing to wind the collectable conductive wire around the first spool in the housing." (Non-Final Office action, August 12, 2025, pg. 6). Therefore, at least for this reason, Applicant respectfully requests withdrawal of the corresponding rejection of claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by Mullins” (page 2 of the Remarks section), however providing a spool to a slidable pane system that uses a flexible wire is well-known in the art as taught by Kim. Additionally, examiner notes that Mullins discloses a flexible wire to actuate the movement of the slidable pane and one of the ordinary skill in the art would find it obvious to provide a drum or spool to store additional length of the flexible wire similarly taught by Kim above. Applicant’s directed to Park et al. (KR 20170012956) are moot as Park was not relied upon in this rejection. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PATRICK B PONCIANO whose telephone number is (571)272-9910. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 6:30-4:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Daniel Cahn can be reached at (571) 270-5616. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PATRICK B. PONCIANO/Examiner, Art Unit 3634 /DANIEL P CAHN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3634
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 22, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Oct 28, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 24, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jan 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12624587
Window Open and Close Mechanism
2y 3m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12618275
LOWER ROLLER
3y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12600213
QUICKLY ASSEMBLED AND DISASSEMBLED WINDOW FRAME STRUCTURE
3y 0m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12584346
DEPLOYABLE DOORWAY BUMPER
2y 4m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584338
STACKING SCREEN DOOR
1y 9m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+15.1%)
2y 5m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 90 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month