Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/642,252

RECHARGEABLE BATTERY

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Apr 22, 2024
Priority
Jun 22, 2020 — RE 10-2020-0075881 +1 more
Examiner
WYROUGH, PAUL CHRISTIAN ST
Art Unit
1723
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
50 granted / 86 resolved
-6.9% vs TC avg
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+34.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
133
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
71.7%
+31.7% vs TC avg
§102
16.4%
-23.6% vs TC avg
§112
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 86 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED CORRESPONDENCE Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Response to Amendments Applicant’s amendment, filed 03/10/2026, has been entered. Claims 1 and 4 have been amended. Claims 1-14 are now pending in this application. Claim Interpretation Claim 1 recites “along the height direction, the first insulating member is adjacent each of the second electrode tab and the terminal plate such that the second electrode tab is between the second insulating member and the first insulating member, and the first insulating member is between the second electrode tab and the terminal plate”. The limitation “along the height direction” is interpreted to apply to only “the second electrode tab is between the second insulating member and the first insulating member”. The limitation “,and the first insulating member is between the second electrode tab and the terminal plate” is an independent clause, having a comma before “and”, a subject, and verb, such that it stands on its own. Additionally, no definition of the term “between” is provided in the instant specification. Accordingly, the broadest reasonable interpretation of limitations effectively regarding "c is between a and b" for spatial position means that point or object c lies anywhere within the bounded geometric region defined by a and b. This includes not just a strict straight line, but a broader corridor, segment span, or 2D/3D bounding space. Claim Objections Claim 4 objected to because of the following informalities:” and r neceivin” should state “and receiving”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 13. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 14. Claims 1-3 and 7-10, and 13-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wakimoto (US-20180375070-A1). 15. Regarding claim 1, Wakimoto teaches a rechargeable [0056] battery (Fig. 1, 20; [0056]) comprising: an electrode assembly (Fig. 1, 3; [0056]) comprising a first electrode tab (Fig. 5, 50; [0057]) and a second electrode tab (Fig. 5, 40; [0057]); a case (Fig. 2, 1; [0056]) comprising an opening and (Fig. 2, opening in 1; [0079]) receiving the electrode assembly 3 to be connected to the first electrode tab (50, wherein all elements of 1 are directly or indirectly connected); a cap assembly (Fig. 2, 1; [0079]) comprising a cap plate (Fig. 2, 2; [0079]) coupled to the case [0079] and covering the opening (see Fig. 2, 2 covering 1; [0079]), and a terminal plate (Fig. 9, 7, wherein at least a bottom portion of 7 is plate shaped; [0080]) coupled (wherein all elements of 1 are directly or indirectly coupled) to the cap plate 2 and connected to the second electrode tab (wherein all elements of 1 are directly or indirectly connected); a first insulating member (Fig. 9, 12; [0087]) between the second electrode tab 40 and the cap plate 2 along a height direction (see Fig. 9, wherein 12 is between 40 and 2 along a vertical direction), and a second insulating member (Fig. 9, 45; [0087]) attached to a surface of the second electrode tab (Fig. 9, wherein 45 is attached to a top surface of 40; see [0087]), wherein the terminal plate 7 comprises: a flange part (Fig. 9, 7a; [0091]) between (see Fig. 9, 7a between 2 and 3) the cap plate 2 and the electrode assembly 3 and attached to an inner surface of the cap plate 2; and a protruded terminal (Fig. 9, 7b; [0059]) protruded from a center of the flange part (Fig. 9, center of 7a) to an outside (Fig. 9, wherein 7b is exposed to the outside) through a terminal hole (Fig. 2, 2a; [0059]) of the cap plate 2 and electrically connected to the second electrode tab [0075-0076] at an inner surface of the terminal plate (Fig. 9, wherein 40 and 7b are electrically connected, via 6, at an inner surface of 7), and wherein, along the height direction (the vertical direction), the first insulating member 12 is adjacent to each of the second electrode tab 40 and the terminal plate 7 (see Fig. 9) such that the second electrode tab 40 is between the second insulating member 45 and the first insulating member 12 , and the first insulating member 12 is between (see claim interpretation above, wherein at least a portion of 12 is between 7 and 40 along a diagonal direction) the second electrode tab 40 and the terminal plate 7. 15. Regarding claim 2, Wakimoto teaches the rechargeable battery of claim 1 (see rejection of claim 1 above), wherein the electrode assembly 3 comprises a first electrode ([0084], “negative electrode”), a second electrode ([0084], “positive electrode”), and a separator therebetween ([0084], “separator”), the first electrode tab (Fig. 5, 50) is extended to the first electrode (Fig. 5, 3a/3b; [0084]), and the second electrode tab (Fig. 5, 40) is extended to the second electrode (Fig. 5, 3a/3b; [0084]). Regarding claim 3, Wakimoto teaches the rechargeable battery of claim 2 (see rejection of claim 2 above), comprising an electrically insulating [0073] material (Fig. 9, 13; [0073]) between (Fig. 9, wherein 13 is between 2 and 7) the cap plate 2 and the terminal plate 7 to electrically insulate [0073] the cap plate 2 and the terminal plate 7 from each other [0073]. Regarding claim 7, Wakimoto teaches the rechargeable battery of claim 2 (see rejection of claim 2 above), wherein the protruded terminal 7b is protruded more with a height difference (see Fig. 9, wherein 7b protrudes higher than 2) than an outer surface of the cap plate (Fig. 9, upper surface of 2). Regarding claim 8, Wakimoto teaches the rechargeable battery of claim 2 (see rejection of claim 2 above), wherein the first insulating member 12 comprises an insulating [0016] washer (see https://www.hlc-metalparts.com/news/types-of-washers-84844438.html#:~:text=Washers%20101:%20Types%2C%20Materials%20&,Here%20is%20a%20detailed%20classification; wherein washers may be rectangular, flat surfaces to distribute loads) attached to an inner surface of the cap plate (Fig. 9, inner surface of 2) and having a through hole (Fig. 9, hole in 12). Regarding claim 9, Wakimoto teaches the rechargeable battery of claim 8 (see rejection of claim 8 above), wherein the insulating washer 12 extends to an inner surface of the flange part (Fig. 9, wherein 12 extends along the upper surface of 7a). Regarding claim 10, Wakimoto teaches the rechargeable battery of claim 8 (see rejection of claim 8 above), wherein the second insulating member 45 comprises an insulating tape [0085] attached to the surface of the second electrode tab (Fig. 9, upper region of 40; see [0087]), a part of the terminal plate (wherein all elements of 1 are directly or indirectly attached), and a part of the first insulating member (wherein all elements of 1 are directly or indirectly attached). Regarding claim 13, Wakimoto teaches the rechargeable battery of claim 2 (see rejection of claim 2 above), wherein the flange part 7a is located at an inner side (Fig. 9, lower surface of 12) of a step of (Fig. 9, stepped portion of 12) the first insulating member 12 to be electrically insulated [0073] from the inner surface of the cap plate 2. Regarding claim 14, Wakimoto teaches the rechargeable battery of claim 13 (see rejection of claim 13 above), wherein the first insulating member 12 comprises the step (Fig. 9, stepped portion of 12), and the flange part 7a is arranged at the step (Fig. 9, wherein 7a is arranged at the stepped portion of 12). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 4-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wakimoto (US 20180375070 A1) in view of Choi (KR-20190007988-A) (refer to enclosed translation for citations). Regarding claim 4, Wakimoto teaches a rechargeable [0056] battery (Fig. 1, 20; [0056]) comprising: an electrode assembly (Fig. 1, 3; [0056]) comprising a first electrode tab (Fig. 5, 50; [0057]) and a second electrode tab (Fig. 5, 40; [0057]); a case (Fig. 2, 1; [0056]) comprising an opening and (Fig. 2, opening in 1; [0079]) r neceiving the electrode assembly 3 to be connected to the first electrode tab (50, wherein all elements of 1 are directly or indirectly connected); a cap assembly (Fig. 2, 1; [0079]) comprising a cap plate (Fig. 2, 2; [0079]) coupled to the case [0079] and covering the opening (see Fig. 2, 2 covering 1; [0079]), and a terminal plate (Fig. 9, 7, wherein at least a bottom portion of 7 is plate shaped; [0080]) coupled (wherein all elements of 1 are directly or indirectly coupled) to the cap plate 2 and connected to the second electrode tab (wherein all elements of 1 are directly or indirectly connected); a first insulating member (Fig. 9, 12; [0087]) between the second electrode tab 40 and the cap plate 2 along a height direction (see Fig. 9, wherein 12 is between 40 and 2 along a vertical direction), and a second insulating member (Fig. 9, 45; [0087]) attached to a surface of the second electrode tab (Fig. 9, wherein 45 is attached to a top surface of 40; see [0087]), wherein the terminal plate 7 comprises: a flange part (Fig. 9, 7a; [0091]) between (see Fig. 9, 7a between 2 and 3) the cap plate 2 and the electrode assembly 3 and attached to an inner surface of the cap plate 2; and a protruded terminal (Fig. 9, 7b; [0059]) protruded from a center of the flange part (Fig. 9, center of 7a) to an outside (Fig. 9, wherein 7b is exposed to the outside) through a terminal hole (Fig. 2, 2a; [0059]) of the cap plate 2 and electrically connected to the second electrode tab [0075-0076] at an inner surface of the terminal plate (Fig. 9, wherein 40 and 7b are electrically connected, via 6, at an inner surface of 7), and wherein, along the height direction (the vertical direction), the first insulating member 12 is adjacent to each of the second electrode tab 40 and the terminal plate 7 (see Fig. 9) such that the second electrode tab 40 is between the second insulating member 45 and the first insulating member 12 , and the first insulating member 12 is between (see claim interpretation above, wherein at least a portion of 12 is between 7 and 40 along a diagonal direction) the second electrode tab 40 and the terminal plate 7 Wakimoto fails to teach a thermal-fusion member comprising an electrically insulating material between the cap plate and the terminal plate to electrically insulate the cap plate and the terminal plate from each other. Choi teaches wherein a thermal fusion member (Fig. 1, A; [0039]) comprises an electrically insulating material ([0039], wherein A comprises melted gasket 134, and [0019] wherein the gasket is made of resin which is insulating), between the cap plate (Fig. 1, uppermost portion of 123) and the terminal plate (Fig. 1, 131) to electrically insulate [0019] the cap plate (uppermost 123) and the terminal plate 131 from each other ([0039],[0019]). It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the present invention to modify a similarly disposed electrically insulating [0073] material (Fig. 9, 13; [0073]) of Wakimoto such that it is a thermal fusion member, such that the cap plate 2 and terminal plate 7 are thermally fused, as Choi suggests that a thermally fused insulating member may increase the bonding force of the seal (Choi, [0077-0078]). Further, Wakimoto teaches modifications may be made to the device (Wakimoto, [0143]). Regarding claim 5, Wakimoto in view of Choi teaches the rechargeable battery of claim 4 (see rejection of claim 4 above), wherein the cap plate 2 and the terminal plate 7 are thermally fused (wherein Wakimoto in view of Choi teaches the cap plate 2 and terminal plate 7 are thermally fused) by the thermal-fusion member (Wakimoto, Fig. 9, 13 modified in view of Choi) disposed therebetween (Fig. 9, wherein 13 is between 2 and 7). Regarding claim 6, Wakimoto in view of Choi teaches the rechargeable battery of claim 4 (see rejection of claim 4 above), wherein the protruded terminal 7b is protruded through the through hole (Fig. 9, hole in 13) of the thermal-fusion member (Wakimoto, Fig. 9, 13 modified in view of Choi) Claims 11-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wakimoto (US 20180375070 A1) in view of Choi (KR-20190007988-A) and Li (WO2017211631A1). Regarding claim 11, Wakimoto in view of Choi teaches the rechargeable battery of claim 8 (see rejection of claim 8 above), but fails to teach further comprising a third insulating member between the second electrode tab and the electrode assembly. Li teaches a third insulating member (Fig. 2, 10; [0033]) between the second electrode tab (Fig. 2, 11; [0021]) and the electrode assembly (Fig. 2, wound body 2, 3, and 4; [0021]). It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the present invention to modify the rechargeable battery of Wakimoto by inserting the insulating member of Li between the second electrode tab 40 and electrode assembly 3 such that it fully covers electrode assembly 3, as Li teaches this is an acceptable embodiment of insulation in the art. Further, Wakimoto teaches modifications may be made to the device (Wakimoto, [0143]). Regarding claim 12, Wakimoto in view of Choi and Li teaches the rechargeable battery of claim 11 (see rejection of claim 11 above), wherein the third insulating member comprises an insulating disk (Li, Fig. 2, disk 10; [0033]) attached to a center of an end of the electrode assembly (wherein all elements of Li are directly or indirectly attached) and being larger than an inner surface of the flange part (see rejection of claim 11 above, wherein the insulating member 10 of Wakimoto fully covers electrode assembly 3 such that it is larger than an inner surface of the flange part 7a in Fig. 9) to be overlapped around a step of the first insulating member (see rejection of claim 11 above, wherein the insulating member 10 of Li fully covers electrode assembly 3 such that it is overlapped around the stepped portion of 12). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 03/10/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant’s arguments have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Applicant argues that Wakimoto does not appear to disclose, along a height direction, the inner insulator 12 being adjacent each of the positive-electrode tab group 40 and the positive electrode terminal 7 such that the inner insulator 12 is between the positive-electrode tab group 40 and the positive electrode terminal 7. However, this is not persuasive, as stated in the claim interpretation section above, the remaining claims should be allowable by virtue of dependence on an allowable claim 1. However, this is not persuasive, as applicant’s arguments are not commensurate in scope with the claims. Applicant appears to be applying “along the height direction” to “, and “the first insulating member is between the second electrode tab and the terminal plate”. However, the limitation “along the height direction” is interpreted to apply to only “the second electrode tab is between the second insulating member and the first insulating member”. The limitation “,and the first insulating member is between the second electrode tab and the terminal plate” is an independent clause, having a comma before “and”, a subject, and verb, such that it stands on its own. The examiner suggests either removing the comma before “and” or repeating the “along the height direction” modifier in order to capture the intended limitation. Applicant arguments regarding Hwangbo are moot in light of the updated rejection in view of Choi (see rejection of claim 4 above). Applicant argues that all other claims should be allowed based off allowable independent claims. However, this is not persuasive, as the rejections on all claim have been sustained. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Kim (US-20110091765-A1), relevant to teaching a different embodiment of a first and third insulating member (see Fig. 1). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PAUL WYROUGH whose telephone number is (571)272-4806. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 10am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, TIFFANY LEGETTE can be reached on (571) 270-7078. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PAUL CHRISTIAN ST WYROUGH/Examiner, Art Unit 1723 /TIFFANY LEGETTE/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1723
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Mar 18, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 01, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Aug 26, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 01, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 03, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Mar 10, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12573693
SEALING BODY AND BATTERY
5y 7m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12482866
BATTERY AND CURRENT COLLECTOR APPLIED THERETO, AND BATTERY PACK AND VEHICLE INCLUDING THE BATTERY
2y 7m to grant Granted Nov 25, 2025
Patent 12469927
DUAL ELECTROLYTE ELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
1y 9m to grant Granted Nov 11, 2025
Patent 12424688
CYLINDRICAL BATTERY
4y 3m to grant Granted Sep 23, 2025
Patent 12407047
BATTERY AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SAME
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 02, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+34.8%)
3y 4m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 86 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month