Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/642,393

DISPLAY DEVICE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Apr 22, 2024
Examiner
CUNNINGHAM, XANTHIA C
Art Unit
2841
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
629 granted / 749 resolved
+16.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
758
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
44.2%
+4.2% vs TC avg
§102
33.9%
-6.1% vs TC avg
§112
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 749 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 7 and 8, filed 22 December 2025, with respect to independent claims 1 has been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection of independent claim 1 has been withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Duan et al. (hereinafter Duan) (US20110164358). Regarding claim 17, Duan discloses a display device comprising: a main body (80)(Figure 5) comprising a display (Paragraph 0020) at a front thereof, a back cover (91) covering a rear of the main body and comprising a hinge hole (92) and a latch receiving hole (153); a stand panel (53) rotatably coupled to the back cover via a hinge module (20); wherein the hinge module is mounted on a front surface of the back cover and extends through the hinge hole (92) to adjust an angle of the stand panel with respect to the back cover; a button (30) fastened to the stand panel and configured to operate a latch (Paragraph 0016 – Each foot 313 may be latched in a corresponding opening (153) ) which engages with the back cover to secure the stand panel to the back cover which engages with the latch receiving hole to secure the stand panel to the back cover; and an open elastic portion (27) coupled to the front surface of the back cover and configured to provide a force pushing the stand panel in a rearward direction through a button hole (92) defined at a button seating portion (top portion of 92) of the back cover shaped to accommodate the button. PNG media_image1.png 489 460 media_image1.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-9 and 11-16 respective dependent claims are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Regarding claim 1, the prior at of record, taken alone or in combination, fails to teach or suggest the interconnection and interrelationship wherein the button is located at a center of the stand panel with respect to a horizontal direction, wherein the elastic hinge module is one of a plurality of elastic hinge modules spaced apart from each other with respect to the horizontal direction, as claimed with the remaining limitations of independent claim 1. Regarding claim 12, the prior at of record, taken alone or in combination, fails to teach or suggest the interconnection and interrelationship of a first hinge bracket mounted to the back cover; a second hinge bracket mounted to the stand panel via the hinge hole; a hinge shaft connecting the first hinge bracket and the second hinge bracket to each other, as claimed with the remaining limitations of independent claim 12. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 22 December 2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues on page 8: “Specifically since the button of claim 17 is located on the stand panel, after pressing and releasing the button, the button is forced rearward by the open elastic portion resulting in deployment of the stand panel. The examiner respectfully disagrees. The applicant does not claim this limitation. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Xanthia C Cunningham whose telephone number is (571)270-1963. The examiner can normally be reached Tuesday -Friday 9 am - 5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Imani Hayman can be reached on 571-270-5528. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /XANTHIA C RELFORD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2841 7 February 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 22, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Dec 22, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597575
HOUSING FOR ELECTROMECHANICAL COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585338
KEYBOARD ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575050
MULTI-DEVICE RACK WIDTH ADAPTER SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568599
DATA PROCESSING DEVICE, CHASSIS AND TRAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12568592
CONDUCTIVE MEMBER HAVING ELASTICITY AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+8.8%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 749 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month