Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/642,908

CLEAR SHOT EXTERIOR SIDE VIEW MIRROR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 23, 2024
Examiner
CHOUDHURY, MUSTAK
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Morris Classic Concepts
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
670 granted / 795 resolved
+16.3% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+22.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
820
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
54.5%
+14.5% vs TC avg
§102
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
§112
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 795 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 07/23/2024 has been considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claims 1 and 11 are objected to because of the following informalities: “the at least one first and the second angled surface extend from the at least one mirror base” should read “at least one first angled surface and the at least one second angled surface extend from the at least one mirror base body” for clarity in view of the disclosures and drawings. Please consider revising and clarifying. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-7, 9-17 and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Scifres (US 4022520) in view of Branham (US PUB 2009/0261226). Scifres and Branham disclose exterior vehicle mirror assembly. Therefore, they are analogous art. PNG media_image1.png 776 796 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 1, Scifres teaches an exterior side view mirror system (a rear view mirror assembly, as shown in FIGS. 1-2) comprising: at least one mirror base (mounting arm 5 and rotating and fixed disk 3 and 4); at least one mirror base affixed to at least one spacer plate (gasket 8) (see column 2, lines 37-42 and as shown in FIG. 2 above); wherein the at least one mirror base further comprises; at least one first angled surface; at least one second angled surface; wherein the at least one first angled surface and the at least one second angled surface extend from the at least one mirror base (as shown in FIG. 2 above); wherein the at least one first angled surface and the at least one second angled surface are opposite to one another (as shown in FIG. 2 above); at least one mirror support neck (mounting arm portion as shown in FIG. 2 above); wherein the at least one mirror support neck is configured to be enclosed by the at least one first angled surface and the at least one second angled surface (as shown in FIG. 2 above); at least one mirror affixment structure (fixed disk 4); wherein the at least one mirror affixment structure is configured to connect to the at least one mirror base by at least one mirror affixment structure connection (i.e., tighten the retaining bolt or similar type fastener so that rotating disc 3 will hold fast against fixed disc 4, column 2, lines 32-34 and as shown in FIG. 2 above); at least one mirror head (mirrors 1 and 2); wherein the at least one mirror head is configured to attach to the at least one mirror base by at least one threaded ball stud (i.e., Mirrors 1 and 2 are independent of each other and can be adjusted to any angle as required. The adjustments, or positioning, are accomplished through the use of ball joint assemblies 12 and 22 (e.g., threaded ball stud), column 2, lines 23-26); at least one mirror head mounting bracket (rotating disk 3); and wherein the at least one mirror head mounting bracket is configured to keep the at least one mirror head stable by at least two mirror head mounting screws (i.e., secure position of disc 3 against disc 4 a tongue and groove or similar type locking system (e.g., mounting screws) can be employed, column 2, lines 34-36, also see column 2, lines 23-42). Scifres fails to teach at least one mirror base mounting bracket affixed between the at least one spacer plate and the at least one mirror base. However, in a related field of endeavor Branham teaches mounting bracket 20 may include a base plate 26 adapted for mounting directly to vehicle exterior 14. A base arm 28 which extends generally laterally outward from base plate 26 for carrying support arm 16, para. [0030], FIG. 1. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Scifres such that a mounting bracket affixed between a base plate and a base arm carrying a support arm as taught by Branham for the purpose of improving a detent joint for exterior mirror assemblies that maintains a proper detent connection. Regarding claim 2, Scifres according to claim 1 further teaches the at least one mirror base defines at least one mirror base screw opening (as shown in FIG. 2 above). Regarding claim 3, Scifres fails to teach the at least one mirror base screw opening is configured as a threaded hole. However, in a related field of endeavor Branham teaches spring member 58 is disposed in and biased against base arm 28 and securing member 56 to pull support arm 16 towards base arm 28. Distal end 55 of securing member 56 may be threaded for receiving a washer 57 and nut 59 to secure distal end 55 against support arm 16, para. [0035], FIGS. 2, 4 and 6. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Scifres such that a securing member may be threaded for receiving a nut 59 (with a threaded hole, shown in FIG. 2) as taught by Branham, for the purpose of improving a detent joint for exterior mirror assemblies that maintains a proper detent connection. Regarding claim 4, Scifres fails to teach the at least one mirror affixment structure defines at least one threaded ball stud opening. However, in a related field of endeavor Branham teaches spring member 58 is disposed in and biased against base arm 28 and securing member 56 to pull support arm 16 towards base arm 28. Distal end 55 of securing member 56 may be threaded for receiving a washer 57 and nut 59 to secure distal end 55 against support arm 16, para. [0035], FIGS. 2, 4 and 6. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Scifres such that a securing member may be threaded for receiving a nut 59 (ball stud) (with a threaded opening, shown in FIG. 2) as taught by Branham, for the purpose of improving a detent joint for exterior mirror assemblies that maintains a proper detent connection. Regarding claim 5, Scifres fails to teach the at least one threaded ball stud opening is configured as a threaded hole. However, in a related field of endeavor Branham teaches spring member 58 is disposed in and biased against base arm 28 and securing member 56 to pull support arm 16 towards base arm 28. Distal end 55 of securing member 56 may be threaded for receiving a washer 57 and nut 59 to secure distal end 55 against support arm 16, para. [0035], FIGS. 2, 4 and 6. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Scifres such that a securing member may be threaded for receiving a nut (ball stud) (with a threaded hole, shown in FIG. 2) as taught by Branham, for the purpose of improving a detent joint for exterior mirror assemblies that maintains a proper detent connection. Regarding claim 6, Scifres according to claim 1 further teaches the at least one mirror affixment structure (fixed disk 4) is shaped as a column, polygon, or hollow rectangle shape (as shown in FIG. 2 above). Regarding claim 7, Scifres according to claim 1 further teaches the at least one mirror affixment structure, the at least one mirror support neck, and the at least one mirror base body are configured to form a center line and are configured with an angle ranging from 0 degrees to 60 degrees (as shown in FIG. 2 above). Regarding claim 9, Scifres according to claim 1 further teaches the at least one mirror head mounting bracket (30 is configured to connect the at least one mirror head (1) to the at least one mirror base (5) (as shown in FIG. 2 above). Regarding claim 10, Scifres fails to teach the at least one mirror base mounting bracket is configured to connect the at least one mirror base to the at least one spacer plate. However, in a related field of endeavor Branham teaches mounting bracket 20 may include a base plate 26 adapted for mounting directly to vehicle exterior 14. A base arm 28 which extends generally laterally outward from base plate 26 for carrying support arm 16, para. [0030], FIG. 1. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Scifres such that mounting bracket affixed between a base plate and a base arm carrying a support arm as taught by Branham, for the purpose of improving a detent joint for exterior mirror assemblies that maintains a proper detent connection. Regarding claim 11, Scifres teaches a method for making an exterior side view mirror system (method of making of a rear view mirror assembly, as shown in FIGS. 1-2) comprising: forming at least one spacer plate (gasket 8) (see column 2, lines 37-42 and as shown in FIG. 2 above); forming at least one mirror base (mounting arm 5 and rotating and fixed disk 3 and 4) affixed to at least one spacer plate (as shown in FIG. 2 above); wherein the at least one mirror base is configured to comprise; at least one first angled surface; at least one second angled surface; wherein the at least one first angled surface and the at least one second angled surface are configured to extend from the at least one mirror base (as shown in FIG. 2 above); wherein the at least one first angled surface and the at least one second angled surface are configured opposite one another (as shown in FIG. 2 above); at least one mirror support neck (mounting arm portion as shown in FIG. 2 above); wherein the at least one mirror support neck is configured to be enclosed by the at least one first angled surface and the at least one second angled surface (as shown in FIG. 2 above); at least one mirror affixment structure (fixed disk 4); wherein the at least one mirror affixment structure is configured to connect to the at least one mirror base by at least one mirror affixment structure connection (i.e., tighten the retaining bolt or similar type fastener so that rotating disc 3 will hold fast against fixed disc 4, column 2, lines 32-34 and as shown in FIG. 2 above); forming at least one mirror head (mirrors 1 and 2); forming at least one threaded ball stud (ball joint 12); wherein the at least one threaded ball stud is configured to attach to the at least one mirror head to the at least one mirror base (i.e., Mirrors 1 and 2 are independent of each other and can be adjusted to any angle as required. The adjustments, or positioning, are accomplished through the use of ball joint assemblies 12 and 22 (e.g., threaded ball stud), column 2, lines 23-26); forming at least one mirror head mounting bracket (rotating disk 3); and wherein the at least one mirror head mounting bracket is configured to keep the at least one mirror head stable by at least two mirror head mounting screws (i.e., secure position of disc 3 against disc 4 a tongue and groove or similar type locking system (e.g., mounting screws) can be employed, column 2, lines 34-36, also see column 2, lines 23-42). Scifres fails to teach forming a mirror base mounting bracket affixed between the at least one spacer plate and the at least one mirror base. However, in a related field of endeavor Branham teaches mounting bracket 20 may include a base plate 26 adapted for mounting directly to vehicle exterior 14. A base arm 28 which extends generally laterally outward from base plate 26 for carrying support arm 16, para. [0030], FIG. 1. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Scifres such that a mounting bracket affixed between a base plate and a base arm carrying a support arm as taught by Branham for the purpose of improving a detent joint for exterior mirror assemblies that maintains a proper detent connection. Furthermore, the method of forming the device/system is not germane to the issue of patentability of the device itself. Therefore, this limitation has not been given patentable weight. Regarding claim 12, Scifres according to claim 1 further teaches forming the at least one mirror base defines at least one mirror base screw opening (as shown in FIG. 2 above). Regarding claim 13, Scifres fails to teach forming the at least one mirror base screw opening is configured as a threaded hole. However, in a related field of endeavor Branham teaches spring member 58 is disposed in and biased against base arm 28 and securing member 56 to pull support arm 16 towards base arm 28. Distal end 55 of securing member 56 may be threaded for receiving a washer 57 and nut 59 to secure distal end 55 against support arm 16, para. [0035], FIGS. 2, 4 and 6. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Scifres such that a securing member may be threaded for receiving a nut 59 (with a threaded hole, shown in FIG. 2) as taught by Branham, for the purpose of improving a detent joint for exterior mirror assemblies that maintains a proper detent connection. Regarding claim 14, Scifres fails to teach forming the at least one mirror affixment structure defines at least one threaded ball stud opening. However, in a related field of endeavor Branham teaches spring member 58 is disposed in and biased against base arm 28 and securing member 56 to pull support arm 16 towards base arm 28. Distal end 55 of securing member 56 may be threaded for receiving a washer 57 and nut 59 to secure distal end 55 against support arm 16, para. [0035], FIGS. 2, 4 and 6. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Scifres such that a securing member may be threaded for receiving a nut 59 (ball stud) (with a threaded opening, shown in FIG. 2) as taught by Branham, for the purpose of improving a detent joint for exterior mirror assemblies that maintains a proper detent connection. Regarding claim 15, Scifres fails to teach forming the at least one threaded ball stud opening is configured as a threaded hole. However, in a related field of endeavor Branham teaches spring member 58 is disposed in and biased against base arm 28 and securing member 56 to pull support arm 16 towards base arm 28. Distal end 55 of securing member 56 may be threaded for receiving a washer 57 and nut 59 to secure distal end 55 against support arm 16, para. [0035], FIGS. 2, 4 and 6. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Scifres such that a securing member may be threaded for receiving a nut (ball stud) (with a threaded hole, shown in FIG. 2) as taught by Branham, for the purpose of improving a detent joint for exterior mirror assemblies that maintains a proper detent connection. Regarding claim 16, Scifres according to claim 1 further teaches forming the at least one mirror affixment structure (fixed disk 4) is shaped as a column, polygon, or hollow rectangle shape (as shown in FIG. 2 above). Regarding claim 17, Scifres according to claim 1 further teaches forming the at least one mirror affixment structure, the at least one mirror support neck, and the at least one mirror base body are configured to form a center line and are configured with an angle ranging from 0 degrees to 60 degrees (as shown in FIG. 2 above). Regarding claim 19, Scifres according to claim 1 further teaches forming the at least one mirror head mounting bracket (30 is configured to connect the at least one mirror head (1) to the at least one mirror base (5) (as shown in FIG. 2 above). Regarding claim 20, Scifres fails to teach forming the at least one mirror base mounting bracket is configured to connect the at least one mirror base to the at least one spacer plate. However, in a related field of endeavor Branham teaches mounting bracket 20 may include a base plate 26 adapted for mounting directly to vehicle exterior 14. A base arm 28 which extends generally laterally outward from base plate 26 for carrying support arm 16, para. [0030], FIG. 1. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Scifres such that mounting bracket affixed between a base plate and a base arm carrying a support arm as taught by Branham, for the purpose of improving a detent joint for exterior mirror assemblies that maintains a proper detent connection. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8 and 18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 8, the prior art does not teach, or renders obvious, regarding the at least one spacer plate is configured to be tapered and is configured to be thicker on the proximal end of the at least one mirror base and thinner on the distal end of the at least one mirror base. Regarding claim 18, the prior art does not teach, or renders obvious, regarding forming the at least one spacer plate is configured to be tapered and is configured to be thicker on the proximal end of the at least one mirror base and thinner on the distal end of the at least one mirror base. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Pavao (US 7073914) teaches “a fixed mounting portion 16, which fixedly mounts mirror assembly 11 to a side panel of a vehicle.”, column 5, lines 51-55, FIG. 1. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MUSTAK CHOUDHURY whose telephone number is (571)272-5247. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 8AM-5PM EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricky Mack can be reached on (571)272-2333. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MUSTAK CHOUDHURY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872 March 12, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 23, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601903
OPTICAL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596244
SURGICAL MICROSCOPE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585102
SLIDE HOLDER AND SLIDE-HOLDER SUPPORT STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12572011
OPTICAL SYSTEM WITH CROSS TRACK ERROR REDUCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12566339
Treating Ocular Refractive Error
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.8%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 795 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month