Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/643,064

MOTOR COOLING SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Apr 23, 2024
Priority
Aug 04, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0102040
Examiner
MULLINS, BURTON S
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Hyundai Motor Group
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
70%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
917 granted / 1332 resolved
+0.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+1.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1367
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
45.1%
+5.1% vs TC avg
§102
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
§112
31.0%
-9.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1332 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 6 is directed to subject matter of a third embodiment described in the specification ¶[0048]-¶[0053] shown in Figs.8-9. In particular, the claim is directed to a cooling fluid spraying part including “an extending support portion [430] fitted between the stator core [100] and the housing [200] while covering an outer surface of the stator core, the extending support portion having one end coupled to the first coupling portion [310] and the second coupling portion [320] of the terminal bus bar.” But, this conflicts with the structure in claim 1, directed to a first embodiment comprising a cooling fluid spraying part including a “nozzle ring [410]” described in ¶[0041]-¶[0042] & shown in Fig.5. The extending support portion 430 does not comprise a nozzle ring 410 and the nozzle ring does not (nor can it) include an extending support portion fitted between the stator core and the housing while covering an outer surface of the stator core. By virtue of the manner in which Applicant amended the claims, claim 6 now improperly combines features exclusive to another embodiment and is therefore new matter. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 6-10 & 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. As noted above, claim 6 is directed to structure distinct from claim 1 and is therefore indefinite. In claim 7, “”the first and second coupling portions” lacks antecedent basis. In claim 12, “wherein an end portion of the fluid storage portion protrudes toward the coil after being bent to form a question mark shape” is indefinite in scope. With reference to Fig.6, the specification ¶[0042] describes “…the fluid storage portion 412 may be formed to have a curved surface, and a partial portion of the fluid storage portion 412 may protrude toward the end coil C after being bent to form a question mark shape.” PNG media_image1.png 699 610 media_image1.png Greyscale But, this is indefinite in scope and appears to presume an unspecified typescript. Question marks of other typescripts differ from that shown in Fig.6, e.g., ? [Century Gothic], ? [Caveat] and ? [Harrington]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1, 3-5 & 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Liu et al. (US Pat.Pub.2023/0318370). Regarding claim 1, Liu teaches a motor cooling system comprising: a cylindrical stator core 20 with a coil 30 wound to be fitted on an inner side thereof; a housing 10 fitted on an outer side of the stator core to support a position of the stator core, and having an injection port 11 formed therethrough to inject a cooling fluid (oil); and a cooling fluid spraying part (nozzle) 41 including a structure guiding the cooling fluid injected through the injection port 11 and flowing between the stator core 20 and the housing 10 to flow toward the coil 30 (Fig.31), wherein the stator core 20 includes at least one first cooling passage that is a groove 22 formed in an outer surface of the stator core in an axial direction (¶[0161]; Fig.9), the housing 10 includes at least one second cooling passage that is a groove 13 formed in an inner surface of the housing in a circumferential direction (Fig.3B), the cooling fluid spraying part includes a nozzle ring (end cap) 41 coupled to one end of the housing, and the nozzle ring 41 includes a first fluid spraying hole (nozzles) 411 guiding the cooling fluid flowing from the at least one first cooling passage to pass through the first fluid spraying hole 411 toward the coil in a direction away from the at least one second cooling passage (groove) 13 (Fig.33). PNG media_image2.png 517 514 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 3, the stator core 20 includes two or more cooling lines 22, each including two or more first cooling passages 22a-22c formed adjacent to one another, and the cooling lines are disposed to be spaced apart from one another at predetermined intervals in the circumferential direction (Fig.9). Regarding claim 4, the cooling fluid spraying part 41 includes a nozzle ring 411 coupled to one end of the housing 10, and the nozzle ring includes: a fixing portion (not numbered) coupled to one end of the inner surface of the housing 10; a fluid storage portion (oil channel) 103 having one end integrally formed with the fixing portion and another end in contact with one end surface of the stator core; and a fluid spraying hole 411 formed through the fluid storage portion (¶[0176]-¶[0177]; Figs.21-25). Regarding claim 5, the cooling fluid spraying part includes a core support end formed at one end of the housing 10, and the core support end includes: a first support end extending from the inner surface of the housing 10 in a radial direction; a second support end extending from a distal end of the first support end in the axial direction; and a second fluid spraying hole 421 formed through at least one of the first support end or the second support end (Figs.36-38). Regarding claim 13, the first fluid spraying hole is formed at a position of the fluid storage portion protruding highest in the axial direction toward the coil with respect to the fixing portion (Fig.38). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1, 3-5, 11 & 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cathey (US 3,531,668) in view of Lui. Regarding claim 1, Cathey teaches a motor cooling system comprising: a cylindrical stator core 19 with a coil 29 wound to be fitted on an inner side thereof; a housing 11 fitted on an outer side of the stator core to support a position of the stator core, and having an injection port 27 formed therethrough to inject a cooling fluid (abstract); and a cooling fluid spraying part including a structure (cavity) 26 guiding the cooling fluid injected through the injection port and flowing between the stator core and the housing to flow toward the coil, wherein the stator core 19 includes at least one first cooling passage that is a groove formed in an outer surface of the stator core in an axial direction (defined by labyrinth elements or ribs 34 and 36 which may be formed on stator assembly 19; c.3:14-15)…, the cooling fluid spraying part includes a nozzle ring (retaining member) 21 coupled to one end of the housing, and the nozzle ring includes a first fluid spraying hole (orifice) 28 guiding the cooling fluid flowing from the at least one first cooling passage to pass through the first fluid spraying hole toward the coil in an angled direction (c.2:50-53; Fig.1). PNG media_image3.png 516 768 media_image3.png Greyscale Cathey’s housing 11 does not include “at least one second cooling passage that is a groove formed in an inner surface of the housing in a circumferential direction”. But, Liu teaches a motor including a housing 10 with an oil filling port 11 and at least one second cooling passage that is a (connecting) groove 13 formed in an inner surface 12 of the housing 10 in a circumferential direction (Fig.2), so that the coolant injected from the oil filling port 11 can circumferentially flow in the housing 10 and can be diffused to each circumferential location of the outer surface of the stator core 20 therethrough ([0140]). Thus, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date to provide Cathey’s housing with at least one second cooling passage that is a groove formed in an inner surface of the housing in a circumferential direction since Liu teaches this would have enabled coolant injected from the oil filling port 11 to circumferentially flow in the housing 10 and diffuse to each circumferential location of the outer surface of the stator core 20 Further, in the combination, Cathey’s angled fluid spraying holes are directed away from the at least one second cooling passage/groove 13 of Liu. Regarding claim 3, Cathey teaches the stator core includes two or more cooling lines, each including two or more first cooling passages formed adjacent to one another, and the cooling lines are disposed to be spaced apart from one another at predetermined intervals in the circumferential direction (c.3:14-15; Fig.2) Regarding claim 4, Cathey teaches the cooling fluid spraying part includes a nozzle ring 21 coupled to one end of the housing 10 (at 61), and the nozzle ring includes: a fixing portion coupled to one end of the inner surface of the housing 10; a fluid storage portion (reservoirs) 38 having one end integrally formed with the fixing portion and another end in contact with one end surface of the stator core; the first fluid spraying hole 28 formed through the fluid storage portion (Fig.2). Regarding claim 5, Cathey teaches the cooling fluid spraying part includes a core support end formed at one end of the housing, and the core support end includes: a first support end 21 extending from the inner surface of the housing 11 in a radial direction; a second support end 22 extending from a distal end of the first support end in the axial direction; and a second fluid spraying hole 28 formed through at least one of the first support end or the second support end (Fig.1). Regarding claim 11, Cathey teaches the fixing portion (at 61) of the nozzle ring 21 is coupled to the one end of the inner surface of the housing by being inserted into a groove formed on the inner surface of the housing (i.e., threads, c.3:67-69; Fig.1). Regarding claim 13, Cathey teaches the first fluid spraying hole 28 is formed at a position of the fluid storage portion 38 protruding highest in the axial direction toward the coil with respect to the fixing portion (Fig.1). Claim 6, as best understood, is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lui in view of Endo et al. (US 11,920,673). Regarding claim 6, Yang’s cooling fluid spraying part further includes an extending support portion (spray ring) 4 fitted between the stator core 21 and the housing 1 while covering an outer surface of the stator core (Fig.1), but does not further teach a terminal bus bar including a first coupling portion coupled to the housing and a second coupling portion coupled to the coil…, the extending support portion having one end coupled to the first coupling portion and the second coupling portion of the terminal bus bar. But, Endo teaches an electric drive including a cooling system, a housing 14, a stator core 31 with a coil 32, a terminal bus bar 52 including a first coupling portion 53 coupled to the housing 14 and a second coupling portion (not numbered) coupled to the coil (c.9:59-c.10:5; Fig.1). The terminal bus bar inputs and outputs electric power to and from the windings of the stator coil (c.10:1-5). PNG media_image4.png 444 566 media_image4.png Greyscale Thus, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date to provide Yang with a terminal bus bar including a first coupling portion coupled to the housing and a second coupling portion coupled to the coil since Endo teaches the terminal bus bar would have been desirable to input and output electric power to and from the windings of the stator coil. Further, in the combination, Yang’s the extending support portion 4 would having one end coupled to the first coupling portion and the second coupling portion of the terminal bus bar of Endo. Claim 7, as best understood, is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ziskovsky et al. (US 12,049,925) in view of Endo et al. (US 11,920,673). Regarding claim 7, Ziskovsky teaches a motor cooling system comprising: a cylindrical stator core 302 with a coil 344 wound to be fitted on an inner side thereof; a housing 318 fitted on an outer side of the stator core to support a position of the stator core, and having an injection port 320 formed therethrough to inject a cooling fluid; and a cooling fluid spraying part (spray ring) 326 including a structure guiding the cooling fluid injected through the injection port 320 and flowing between the stator core 302 and the housing 318 to flow toward the coil (i.e., in clearance 301 surrounding stator), wherein the cooling fluid spraying part 326 further includes an extending support portion fitted between the stator core 302 and the housing 318 while covering an outer surface of the stator core (Fig.3), wherein the extending support portion includes: a cylindrical first extension (radial surface) 418 extending to cover the outer surface of the stator core 302; and a second extension (axial surface) 414 disposed…to cover and protect an area where the coil 344 is provided, and the second extension 414 is formed to be concave inwardly from the first extension (i.e., second extension has smaller diameter than first extension; Fig.6). PNG media_image5.png 523 588 media_image5.png Greyscale Ziskovsky does not appear to teach “first and second coupling portions” [sic] (i.e., of a terminal bus bar, for instance). But, Endo teaches an electric drive including a cooling system, a housing 14, a stator core 31 with a coil 32, a terminal bus bar 52 including a first coupling portion 53 coupled to the housing 14 and a second coupling portion (not numbered) coupled to the coil (c.9:59-c.10:5; Fig.1). The terminal bus bar couplings input and output electric power to and from the windings of the stator coil (c.10:1-5). PNG media_image4.png 444 566 media_image4.png Greyscale Thus, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date to further provide Ziskovsky with “first and second coupling portions” (i.e., a terminal bus bar) since Endo teaches the terminal bus bar would have been desirable to input and output electric power to and from the windings of the stator coil. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8-10 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prior art of record does not teach the claimed motor cooling system including, inter alia, “an inner surface of the first extension contacting the stator core includes a curved surface to match the outer surface of the stator core, and an outer surface of the first extension [431] contacting the housing [200] is formed to be gradually inclined to the stator core toward a distal end of the first extension” (claim 8, Figs.8-9), or “wherein the stator core further includes a support groove [120] formed to be concave from the outer surface of the stator core and extending in a circumferential direction, and the first extension [431] includes a protrusion [433] protruding from an inner surface thereof to correspond to the support groove” (claim 10, Fig.9). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments have been considered but are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BURTON S MULLINS whose telephone number is (571)272-2029. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tulsidas C Patel can be reached at 571-272-2098. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BURTON S MULLINS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 23, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112
May 11, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 23, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112
Sep 23, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749945
BRUSHLESS DC MOTOR POWER TOOL WITH COMBINED PCB DESIGN
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12738809
AXIAL FLUX MOTOR, ELECTRIC DEVICE, AND VEHICLE
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732080
METHOD FOR PROCESSING A PLANAR OBJECT WITH THE AID OF A PLANAR DRIVE SYSTEM
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12706551
Microelectromechanical System for Moving a Mechanical Part in Two Opposite Directions
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12689257
SEMI-METALLIC GASKET, MOTOR, AND METHOD FOR SEALING MOTOR
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
70%
With Interview (+1.5%)
2y 9m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1332 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month