Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/643,412

MINIMIZING BULK CHARGE IN AN ELECTROADHESIVE ACTUATOR

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Apr 23, 2024
Priority
Dec 30, 2020 — provisional 63/132,265 +2 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, DANNY
Art Unit
2838
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Nike Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
1230 granted / 1364 resolved
+22.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1390
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
39.3%
-0.7% vs TC avg
§102
47.6%
+7.6% vs TC avg
§112
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1364 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments 1. Applicant's arguments filed on 04/30/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Regarding claim 1, Applicant argued that Yoon does not discloses wherein the first and second signals comprise respective opposite-polarity portions of an alternating current (AC) signal. Examiner respectively disagrees with the argument. PNG media_image1.png 451 494 media_image1.png Greyscale Yoon discloses a signal generator 604 configured to generate different AC waveforms (see the attached figure 6 above), wherein each AC waveform includes the first and second signals comprise respective opposite-polarity portions ( the AC signals, shown in the attached figure 6, includes opposite polarity signals such as a positive signal portion P and a negative signal portion N). Applicant further argued that Yoon does not disclose a processor circuit configured to receive a clutch force indication. Examiner respectively disagrees with applicant’s argument. Yoon discloses a processor (a MCU 602) configured to receive a clutch force indication (an amount of clutch force applied to the electrodes depends on a displacement (overlapping) between the first and second electrodes, less overlapping between the electrodes, there are more clutch electrostatic force applied, Thus the processor 602 receives a clutch force indication based on an amount of displacement between the electrodes that is sensed by a displacement sensor 302, indicating see par. 0032). Noting that “clutch force indication is provided, by a displacement sensor, based on the displacement between the electrodes (see claim 2). Therefore, applicant’s arguments do not distinguish over the Yoon reference. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 2. Claims 1, 2, 5-7, 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by Yoon et al (USPN 2020/0081532). Regarding claim 1, Yoon discloses an electro-adhesive device (300 shown in figure 3, also figures 6-8) comprising: a first electrode assembly (first electrodes 302) comprising a first conductive portion (314) that is at least partially covered by a first insulator (the dielectric layer 316 at least partially coated on a surface of the conductive portion 314, see par. 0031); a second electrode assembly (306) comprising a second conductive portion (314) that is at least partially covered by a second insulator (316) (see figure 3, par. 0031); an electrical signal generator (a waveform generator 604 of a controller 318, see par. 0040) configured to provide first and second signals to the first and second conductive portions (314) of the electrode assemblies (302, 306), respectively, wherein the first and second signals comprise respective opposite- polarity portions of an alternating current (AC) signal (such as the waveform generator 604 provides a sinusoidal signals to the conductive portions 314 of the electrodes 302, 306, see par. 0042, 0051); and a processor circuit (such as a processor 602 of the controller 318, see par. 0040) configured to receive a clutch force indication (a clutch force indication is related to a motion of the first and second electrode assemblies which is detected by a displacement sensor 320, see par. 0032) and, in response, control the electrical signal generator (604) to change a characteristic of the AC signal based on the clutch force indication (such as adjusting the AC control signal, see par. 0032, 0069); wherein the first and second electrode assemblies (302, 306) are at least partially overlapping and configured to slide relative to each other at their respective surfaces that comprise the first and second insulators (316) (see figure 3). Regarding claim 2, Yoon discloses a displacement sensor (such as a displacement sensor 320, see figure 3) configured to provide the clutch force indication (such as a displacement between electrodes) based on information about a relative displacement of the first and second electrode assemblies (see par. 0032). Regarding claim 5, Yoon discloses wherein the processor circuit (602) is configured to control the electrical signal generator (604) to change a magnitude characteristic of the AC signal based on the clutch force indication (e.g. see par. 0032, 0069). Regarding claim 6, Yoon discloses wherein the processor circuit (602) is configured to control the electrical signal generator (604) to change a frequency characteristic of the AC signal based on the clutch force indication (see par. 0032, 0069). Regarding claim 7, Yoon discloses wherein the processor circuit (602) is configured to control the electrical signal generator (604) to change a duty cycle characteristic of the AC signal (such as by adjusting an amplitude of the AC control signal of the generator 604) based on the clutch force indication (see par. 0032, 0051). Regarding claim 9, Yoon discloses wherein the electrical signal generator (604) is configured to generate the AC signal as a pulse-width modulated signal with a duty cycle of about 50% (see par. 0042, and waveforms in figure 6). 3. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yoon et al (USPN 2020/0081532) in view of Collins et al (USPN 5315473). Regarding claim 8, Yoon discloses the AC signal has a frequency, but does not explicitly disclose the frequency as claimed. Collins discloses an electrostatic device comprises a signal generator device configured to generate an AC signal has a frequency of at least about 10 Hz and less than about 50 Hz (see col. 6, lines 10-13, lines 42-44). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to have modified the AC signal of Yoon to incorporate an AC signal frequency as disclosed by Collins in order to facilitate electrostatic force without vibration and free clamping force decay. Allowable Subject Matter 4. Claims 12-20 are allowed over prior art of record. The following is an examiner's statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art of record neither anticipates nor renders obvious the claimed subject matter of the instant application as a whole either taken alone or in combination, in particular, prior art of record does not teach: A system comprising: a motion sensor configured to identify motion of a wearer of the wearable garment; and a processor circuit configured to determine a clutch indication based on information from the motion sensor and, in response, control the clutch device of the wearable garment to couple or release the first and second portions of the garment as recited in claim 12. A wearable device comprising: the clutch device including the first conductive portion is coupled to the first portion of the garment, and the second conductive portion is coupled to the second portion of the garment, and the first and second conductive portions of the clutch device are at least partially overlapping at respective surfaces that comprise the first and second insulators; and a processor circuit configured to determine a clutch indication based on oscillatory motion information from the accelerometer and, in response, control the clutch device to couple or release the first and second portions of the garment as recited in claim 19. 5. Claims 3-4, 10, 11 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion 6. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. 7. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANNY NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-2054. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00AM-4:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Monica Lewis can be reached at 571-271-1838. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANNY NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 30, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707552
ELECTRO-STATIC DISCHARGE PROTECTION STRUCTURE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707611
ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE PROTECTION ARRANGEMENT FOR FREQUENCY CONVERTER
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706450
CIRCUIT BREAKER FORENSICS FOR POWER DISTRIBUTION UNITS
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701961
ELECTROSTATIC ATTRACTION DEVICE AND ELECTROSTATIC ADSORPTION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695398
ELECTROSTATIC CHUCK AND SUSCEPTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+6.4%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1364 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month