Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/644,219

System and Method for Traversing Vertical Obstacles

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Apr 24, 2024
Examiner
TO, TOAN C
Art Unit
3614
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Starship Technologies Oü
OA Round
2 (Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allow Rate
903 granted / 986 resolved
+39.6% vs TC avg
Minimal -4% lift
Without
With
+-3.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
998
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
§102
52.2%
+12.2% vs TC avg
§112
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 986 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 2-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by King (4,993,912). Regarding claims 2-11, 13, and 21 King discloses a mobile robot comprising: a plurality of wheel mechanisms, and at least one lever (62, 64), each for connecting two of the wheel mechanisms (20, 22) on a side of the mobile robot and configured to rotate freely with respect to a pivot point (82, 84) between said two-wheel mechanisms (20, 22) such that the relative order positional of said two-wheel mechanisms (20, 22) is maintained; wherein the at least one lever is configured to rotate freely in an unactuated state (when clutch 88 disengages the wheel over wheel motor 86), wherein the at least one lever (62, 64) is configured to be rotated by a motor (86) in an actuated state (when the clutch 88 engages the motor 86), wherein the robot comprises a clutch (88) for changing a state of the at least one tiling lever (62, 64) between the unactuated state and the actuated state; wherein, at least one lever (62, 64) in the actuated state is configured to exert a downward and/or upward force with respect to the ground, selectively on at least one of the middle wheels (20); at least one lever (62, 64) in the actuated state is configured to exert a downward and/or upward force with respect to the ground, selectively on at least one of the rear wheels (20); at least two motors (66, 68, 86), each of which being adapted to drive at least one respective wheel and/or the at least one lever in the actuated state, wherein the at least one lever (62, 64) is configured to rotate freely until a certain angle of rotation is reached, wherein the at least one lever is configured to rotate freely by at most 60°, clockwise and counterclockwise; wherein the at least one lever is configured to rotate freely by at most 45°, clockwise and counterclockwise (see fig. 2); wherein the relative positional order of said two wheel mechanisms is maintained with respect to a longitudinal direction of the mobile robot. Regarding claim 12, King discloses a mobile robot comprising: wherein the at least one lever (62) is configured to rotate freely until a particular inclination angle is reached, at which point a motor (66, 68) is configured to engage the at least one lever to rotate the at least one lever. Regarding claims 12, and 14-16, King discloses wherein the plurality of wheel mechanisms (20, 22) comprises on a left side of the mobile robot: a left front wheel mechanism including a left front wheel (14), a left rear wheel mechanism including a left rear wheel (26), and a left middle wheel mechanism including a left middle wheel (24) positioned between the left front wheel and the left rear wheel, and on a right side of the mobile robot: a right front wheel mechanism including a right front wheel (12), a right rear wheel mechanism including a right rear wheel (22), and a right middle wheel mechanism including a right middle wheel (20), positioned between the right front wheel and the right rear wheel; and wherein the mobile robot is configured such that a relative order of the rear wheels and the middle wheels is maintained while the robot traverses at least vertical obstacles (see fig. 2); an enclosed space (40) for holding at least one item for delivery; wherein the robot is configured to traverse curbstones. Regarding claims 17-20, King discloses a method comprising:(a) providing at least one lever (62) rotating around the pivot point while the robot is travelling, wherein in (b) the method comprises the at least one lever (62) rotating freely; the at least one lever (62) rotating freely until a certain angle of rotation is reached, wherein in (b) the method comprises engaging at least one lever turn motor (66, 68) once the lever (62) reaches a certain tilting angle. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed November 19, 2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The examiner respectfully disagrees with applicant’s arguments that King (U.S. 4,993,912) does not maintain “a relative positional order of said two wheel mechanisms” because the following reasons: King discloses a middle wheel 24 is positioned in front of a rear wheel 26, and fig. 1 shows upon traveling in a forward direction the middle wheel 20 is positioned in front of the rear wheel 22, fig 2 shows upon climbing stair the middle wheel 20 is also positioned in front of the rear wheel 22, in other words, the positional of middle wheel 20 is always in front of the rear wheel 22 or a relative positional order of the middle wheel 24 and the rear wheel 26 is maintained. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TOAN C TO whose telephone number is (571)272-6677. The examiner can normally be reached 8-5, Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JASON D SHANSKE can be reached on (571)270-5985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TOAN C TO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3614 March 7, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 24, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 02, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Nov 19, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 07, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600189
CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR VEHICLE SUSPENSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589624
PITCH AND ROLL CONTROL SYSTEM FOR A VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589625
VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583279
CONTROL VALVE DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING DAMPING CHARACTERISTICS, AND HYDRAULIC FLOW-THROUGH SOLENOID VALVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583277
DAMPER CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (-3.8%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 986 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month