Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/644,487

EXTENDED REALITY (XR) DEVICE NOTIFICATIONS FOR WIRELESS CONNECTIVITY ADJUSTMENT

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Apr 24, 2024
Examiner
HENEGHAN, MATTHEW E
Art Unit
3992
Tech Center
3900
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
2 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
77 granted / 92 resolved
+23.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
111
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
§103
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
§102
16.0%
-24.0% vs TC avg
§112
29.4%
-10.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 92 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In response to the previous office action, Applicant has amended claims 1, 2, 5, 7, and 14-20. Claims 1-20 have been examined. Claim Interpretation In light of Applicant’s arguments, no claim limitations are being construed under 35 U.S.C. 112(f). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. Claims 4-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) because the specification, while being enabling for a system comprising “a second XR device; a user equipment (UE); a base station (BS); a wireless access point (AP); a wireless station (STA); a Bluetooth-enabled device; a wireless local area network (WLAN) controller; one or more intermediary radio access network (RAN) elements; or one or more cloud network elements,” does not reasonably provide enablement for all these elements being in a single apparatus, as recited in claim 4. The specification does not enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make the invention commensurate in scope with these claims. Claims 5-7 are dependent upon base claim 4 and wholly incorporate its limitations, rendering them as likewise lacking enablement. For purposes of the prior art search, claims 4-7 are being treated as standing or falling with base claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-3 and 8-20 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: No art was found that discloses a process that would: “obtain operation information for a wireless communications environment; “generate, based on the operation information, a first notification for a first extended reality (XR) device operating within the wireless communications environment, wherein the first notification indicates one or more user actions to adjust wireless connectivity of the first XR device within the wireless communications environment; and “communicate transmit the first notification,” as recited in claims 1, 19, and 20. Claims 2, 3, and 8-18 are allowable based upon their dependence on base claim 1. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 19 June 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive with respect to the rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112(a). Applicant relies on paragraph 184 of the Specification, which refers to figures 1, 3, and 12. The passage describes a set of apparatuses in a system, remote from one another, that are in communication. One skilled the art would ascertain from the text that the “apparatus,” as described therein, is “an apparatus, for example, such as UE 104 of FIGS. 1 and 3.” Further described are several elements, i.e. “a disaggregated base station discussed with respect to FIG. 2, an XR Device, a wireless AP, a wireless STA, a Bluetooth-enabled device, a WLAN controller, one or more intermediary RAN elements, or one or more cloud network elements." An implementation in which all of these components were in a single apparatus would require undue experimentation, as there is no such implementation in the prior art or working examples. Although the art is highly predictable, a person of ordinary skill (a person holding a B.S. in electrical engineering with two years of experience) would not be able to implement the claimed invention in a single apparatus in light of Applicant’s disclosure. The rejection is therefore proper. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW E HENEGHAN whose telephone number is (571)272-3834. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Fuelling can be reached at (571)270-1367. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW E HENEGHAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3992
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 24, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 19, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent RE51041
DEVICE PAIRING
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent RE51042
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD, NETWORK DEVICE AND TERMINAL DEVICE
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent RE51023
WIRELESS TERMINAL
6y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12720363
COMMUNICATION CONTROL METHOD
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent RE51008
USER EQUIPMENT, NETWORK NODE AND RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+5.2%)
3y 3m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 92 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month