Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/644,887

ALUMINUM ALLOY DEOXIDIZER WITH CARBON COMPOUNDS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 24, 2024
Priority
Apr 28, 2023 — TW 112115934
Examiner
MORALES, RICARDO D
Art Unit
1738
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Hf Investment Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
380 granted / 467 resolved
+16.4% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
486
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
57.1%
+17.1% vs TC avg
§102
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
§112
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 467 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over of Rae et al. (KR101637032B1A). Regarding Claim 1, Rae teaches a composite deoxidizer based on Al [0003] where an internal binder be added and be organic binder [0026] in a range of 2-10% weight percent [0027]; overlapping with the claimed range of 0.1-8 wt%, in the case where a claimed range overlaps or lies inside a range taught by the prior art, a prima facie case of obviousness exists. (See MPEP 2144.05(I)) Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Pinheiro et al. (BR102013014368A1) in view of Rae et al. (KR101637032B1). Regarding Claim 1, Pinheiro teaches an Al deoxidizer comprising: Aluminum pellets (briquettes) comprising organic binders (See Claim 2) but is silent using a weight percentage of 0.1-8 as claimed; however Rae teaches a composite deoxidizer based on Al [0003] where an internal binder be added and be organic binder [0026] in a range of 2-10% weight percent [0027] overlapping with the claimed range of 0.1-8 wt%, in the case where a claimed range overlaps or lies inside a range taught by the prior art, a prima facie case of obviousness exists. (See MPEP 2144.05(I)) Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding Claim 2, the closest prior art of record is Rae et al. (KR101637032B1A) which teaches a composite deoxidizer based on Al [0003] where an internal binder be added and be organic binder [0026] in a range of 2-10% weight percent [0027]; overlapping with the claimed range of 0.1-8 wt%; however the prior art does not teach or suggest each and every limitation of claim 2. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RICARDO D MORALES whose telephone number is (571)272-6691. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 9 am- 4 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sally Merkling can be reached at 5712726297. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RICARDO D MORALES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1738
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 24, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12768003
STEEL SHEET AND METHOD OF PRODUCTION OF SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12768004
STEEL SHEET AND METHOD OF PRODUCTION OF SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12759050
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING PROCESS
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12753460
STEEL SHEET
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12747488
CARBIDE REFINING METHOD OF HIGH-CARBON HIGH-ALLOY STEEL
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+16.9%)
2y 8m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 467 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month