Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/645,060

GAS BARRIER LAMINATE, PACKAGING BODY AND PACKAGED ARTICLE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 24, 2024
Priority
Oct 26, 2021 — JP 2021-174684
Examiner
MIGGINS, MICHAEL C
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Toppan Holdings Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
823 granted / 1020 resolved
+20.7% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
1059
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
64.3%
+24.3% vs TC avg
§102
8.7%
-31.3% vs TC avg
§112
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1020 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 3-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1) as being anticipated by WO 2019/142923 (English machine translation). WO 2019/142923 indicates that the objective of this invention is to provide a gas barrier laminate capable of achieving both suppression of retort odor and oxygen barrier properties (paragraph [0005]), and discloses, as examples 1-3, gas barrier laminates in which an aluminum oxide vapor deposition layer is provided on a polyethylene terephthalate film and a first coating layer using a coating solution A containing a polyacrylic acid aqueous solution and a second coating layer using a coating solution B containing a zinc oxide fine particle aqueous dispersion are further provided. Here, document 1 also indicates that in example 1, the thickness of the first coating layer was 0.15 µm and the thickness of the second coating layer was 0.25 µm, in example 2, the thickness of the first coating layer was 0.15 µm and the thickness of the second coating layer was 0.15 µm, and in example 3, the thickness of the first coating layer was 0.15 µm and the thickness of the second coating layer was 0.45 µm. Moreover, document 1 (paragraph [0145]) indicates that the effect of suppressing retort odor can be evaluated by ultraviolet absorbance. Furthermore, according to the disclosure of WO 2019/142923 (paragraph [0034]), it can be understood that the first coating layer may also contain a polyvalent metal compound, and the polyvalent metal compound may be the same as or different from that of the second coating layer. WO 2019/142923 does not specifically disclose a total X-ray fluorescence intensity of metal elements contained in the polyvalent metal-containing particles is 3.0 kcps or greater and 8.0 kcps or less, and an absorbance X of the gas barrier laminate obtained by subtracting an absorbance X₂ at a wavelength of 500 nm from an absorbance X₁ at a wavelength of 350 nm measured with an ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer after hot water treatment at 130°C for 30 minutes using a 0.3 mass% L-cysteine aqueous solution satisfies the following formula (1): X = X₁ - X₂ ≥ 0.02 (abs) (1). However, applicant’s fluorescence and absorbance are inherent in WO 2019/142923. Here, comparing examples 1-3 of document 1 with example 5 of the specification of the present application, the "coating solution A" of WO 2019/142923 corresponds to the "coating solution 3-1" of the specification of the present application, and the "coating solution B" of WO 2019/142923 corresponds to the "coating solution 3-2" of the specification of the present application. Further, although the film thicknesses are somewhat different, considering the wording "the film thickness of the coating layer 3 is preferably 250-500 nm" in the specification (paragraph [0079]) of the present application, the total thickness of the first coating layer and the second coating layer of document 1 (examples 1-3) satisfies the preferred film thickness range, and when the fluorescent X-ray intensity of metal elements included in polyvalent-metal-containing particles and the absorbance X of the gas barrier laminate after a hot-water treatment at 130°C for 30 minutes using a 0.3% by mass L-cysteine aqueous solution, obtained by subtracting the absorbance X2 at a wavelength of 500 nm from the absorbance Xl at a wavelength of 350 nm as measured using an ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer, are measured, the fluorescent X-ray intensity and the absorbance X are found to satisfy the conditions set forth in claim 1 of the present application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over WO 2019/142923 (English machine translation). WO 2019/142923 indicates that the objective of this invention is to provide a gas barrier laminate capable of achieving both suppression of retort odor and oxygen barrier properties (paragraph [0005]), and discloses, as examples 1-3, gas barrier laminates in which an aluminum oxide vapor deposition layer is provided on a polyethylene terephthalate film and a first coating layer using a coating solution A containing a polyacrylic acid aqueous solution and a second coating layer using a coating solution B containing a zinc oxide fine particle aqueous dispersion are further provided. Here, document 1 also indicates that in example 1, the thickness of the first coating layer was 0.15 µm and the thickness of the second coating layer was 0.25 µm, in example 2, the thickness of the first coating layer was 0.15 µm and the thickness of the second coating layer was 0.15 µm, and in example 3, the thickness of the first coating layer was 0.15 µm and the thickness of the second coating layer was 0.45 µm. Moreover, document 1 (paragraph [0145]) indicates that the effect of suppressing retort odor can be evaluated by ultraviolet absorbance. Furthermore, according to the disclosure of WO 2019/142923 (paragraph [0034]), it can be understood that the first coating layer may also contain a polyvalent metal compound, and the polyvalent metal compound may be the same as or different from that of the second coating layer. WO 2019/142923 does not specifically disclose a total X-ray fluorescence intensity of metal elements contained in the polyvalent metal-containing particles is 3.0 kcps or greater and 8.0 kcps or less, and an absorbance X of the gas barrier laminate obtained by subtracting an absorbance X₂ at a wavelength of 500 nm from an absorbance X₁ at a wavelength of 350 nm measured with an ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer after hot water treatment at 130°C for 30 minutes using a 0.3 mass% L-cysteine aqueous solution satisfies the following formula (1): X = X₁ - X₂ ≥ 0.02 (abs) (1). However, applicant’s fluorescence and absorbance are necessarily present in WO 2019/142923. Here, comparing examples 1-3 of document 1 with example 5 of the specification of the present application, the "coating solution A" of WO 2019/142923 corresponds to the "coating solution 3-1" of the specification of the present application, and the "coating solution B" of WO 2019/142923 corresponds to the "coating solution 3-2" of the specification of the present application. Further, although the film thicknesses are somewhat different, considering the wording "the film thickness of the coating layer 3 is preferably 250-500 nm" in the specification (paragraph [0079]) of the present application, the total thickness of the first coating layer and the second coating layer of document 1 (examples 1-3) satisfies the preferred film thickness range, and when the fluorescent X-ray intensity of metal elements included in polyvalent-metal-containing particles and the absorbance X of the gas barrier laminate after a hot-water treatment at 130°C for 30 minutes using a 0.3% by mass L-cysteine aqueous solution, obtained by subtracting the absorbance X2 at a wavelength of 500 nm from the absorbance Xl at a wavelength of 350 nm as measured using an ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer, are measured, the fluorescent X-ray intensity and the absorbance X are found to satisfy the conditions set forth in claim 1 of the present application. It would have been obvious to have provided applicant’s recited fluorescence and absorbance in order to provide improved barrier properties. With regards to claim 2, WO 2019/142923 does not specifically disclose wherein the coating layer is a single layer. However, WO 2019/142923 discloses that functional layers and/or surface protective layers can be single layer. It would have been obvious to have provided wherein the coating layer is a single layer in order to provide lower costs via fewer manufacturing steps. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL C MIGGINS whose telephone number is (571)272-1494. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 1-9 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Aaron Austin can be reached at 571-272-8935. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL C MIGGINS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1782 MCM July 2, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 24, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12673477
Systems and Methods for Fabricating Tote Bags
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12675065
ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHIC BELT AND ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12655236
POST CONSUMER RESIN PACKAGING
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12650344
HEAT PROTECTIVE CASING
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12636862
LIGHTWEIGHT POLYPROPYLENE FILM FOR ASEPTIC PACKAGING APPLICATIONS AND THE PRODUCT RESULTING THEREFROM AND THE PROCESS OF MAKING THE SAME
3y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+16.5%)
2y 5m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1020 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month