Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/645,418

SPEAKER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 25, 2024
Examiner
JOSHI, SUNITA
Art Unit
2691
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Aac Microtech (Changzhou) Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
888 granted / 1102 resolved
+18.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1132
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
64.0%
+24.0% vs TC avg
§102
20.7%
-19.3% vs TC avg
§112
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1102 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. 1. Claims 1 and 2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Applicant’s Admitted Prior Art (AAPA, US202501484668, [0003]) in view of Ma et al. (US20170134862), hereinafter “Ma”. As to Claim 1, AAPA on [0003] teaches a speaker ([0003]), comprising: a frame, a vibration system and a magnetic circuit system fixed with the frame, wherein the magnetic circuit system comprises a lower clamping plate, a main magnet fixed with an upper surface of the lower clamping plate, an annular secondary magnet surrounding the main magnet for forming a magnetic gap, ( the speaker includes a vibration system and a magnetic circuit system, the vibration system includes a voice coil, and the magnetic circuit system includes a lower clamping plate, a main magnet fixed to the lower clamping plate, and a ring-shaped sub-magnet is provided around the main magnet to form a magnetic gap). AAPA does not explicitly teach a frame, the vibration system and a magnetic circuit system fixed with the frame and the lower clamping plate comprises a lower surface opposite to the upper surface and a leakage channel recessed from the upper surface to the lower surface but not penetrating the lower surface, the leakage channel connects to the magnetic gap and an outside of the annular secondary magnet. However, Ma in related field (speaker) teaches a basket 120 for retaining vibration system 11 and magnetic circuit system 10, [0013], Figure 1. Further, regarding the lower clamping plate comprises a lower surface opposite to the upper surface and a leakage channel recessed from the upper surface to the lower surface but not penetrating the lower surface, the leakage channel connects to the magnetic gap and an outside of the annular secondary magnet, Ma teaches on Figures 1-3, [0016] the magnetic circuit system 10 comprises a yoke 100, permanent magnets 101 assembled on the yoke 100, a magnetic gap 102 near the permanent magnets 101, and pole plates 103 attached on the surface of the permanent magnets 101. The yoke 100 comprises an upper surface 1000 for assembling the permanent magnets 101, a lower surface 1001 opposite to the upper surface 1000, side surfaces 1002 connecting the upper surface 1000 and the lower surface 1001, and communication conduits 1003 extending through the upper surface 1000 and the lower surface 1001, and communicating the magnetic gap 102 and the space outside the speaker. The communication conduits 1003 not only can be used to leak air in order to balance the sound pressure inside the speaker 1, but also can dissipate the heat generated by the voice coil 111 when vibrating. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention to modify AAPA such that the lower clamping plate or yoke is further provided with a leakage channel 1003 recessed from the upper surface to the lower surface of the yoke as taught by Ma, Figure 2 to communicate the magnetic gap 102 and the space outside the speaker such that communication conduits 1003 not only can be used to leak air in order to balance the sound pressure inside the speaker 1, but also can dissipate the heat generated by the voice coil 111 when vibrating. See at least Ma on [0016]. As to Claim 2, AAPA in view of Ma teaches the limitations of Claim 1, and Ma further teaches wherein the lower clamping plate( yoke 100, Figures 3, 4) comprises two first long sides opposite to each other,( long axis edge portions 1006, [0018]) two-second-long sides ( two short axis edge portions 1007, Figure 4) perpendicular to the two first long sides ( 1006), and two curved corner portions( side surfaces 1002, [0018], Figure 4) connecting each of the two first long sides( 1006) to each of the second long sides(1007), the leakage channel ( cut out grooves 1004) is located in at least one of the two curved corner portions ( 1002), the two first long sides (1006), the two-second-long sides( 1007]). See at least Ma on [0018], Figures 3, 4) Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SUNITA JOSHI whose telephone number is (571)270-7227. The examiner can normally be reached 8-3. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Duc Nguyen can be reached at 5712727503. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SUNITA JOSHI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2691
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 25, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598429
LOUDSPEAKERS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593188
DIAPHRAGM FOR SOUND GENERATING DEVICES AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF, AND SOUND GENERATING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587794
LOUDSPEAKER STRUCTURE AND LOUDSPEAKER DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581242
SPEAKER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581241
LOUDSPEAKER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+7.1%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1102 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month