Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/645,574

SOCKET CONNECTOR HAVING LOSSY INSERTS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 25, 2024
Examiner
GUSHI, ROSS N
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
TE Connectivity Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
1248 granted / 1488 resolved
+23.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1506
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
36.1%
-3.9% vs TC avg
§102
37.5%
-2.5% vs TC avg
§112
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1488 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the anticipatory rejections under 35 U.S.C. 102 made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1-6, 8, 12-15, and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Mason et al. US 10276958 (“Mason”). Regarding claim 1, Mason discloses a socket connector comprising: a substrate 128 having an upper surface and a lower surface, the substrate including contact channels 502a between the upper and lower surfaces, the substrate including pockets 502b between the upper and lower surfaces, the pockets located between corresponding contact channels; socket contacts 210 received in corresponding contact channels, each socket contact including a contact body 402, an upper mating element 212, and a lower mating element 302, the upper mating element extending to the upper surface to interface with a first electrical component, the lower mating element extending to the lower surface to interface with a second electrical component; and lossy inserts (208, col. 8, lines 20-40) received in the pockets, the lossy inserts being manufactured from lossy material capable of absorbing electrical resonance propagating through the substrate, the lossy inserts being discrete from the substrate and being located in the pockets of the substrate in proximity to the socket contacts. Per claim 2, the substrate separates the pockets from the contact channels. Per claim 3, the lossy inserts are coplanar with the upper and lower surfaces or recessed interior of the upper and lower surfaces, in particular at the faces of the insert abutting the substrate, labeled F1 and F2 in annotated figure 6 below. PNG media_image1.png 1208 906 media_image1.png Greyscale Per claim 4 the lossy inserts are manufactured from lossy material. Per claim 5, the lossy inserts include lossy material inherently providing electric and/or magnetic loss through a portion of the substrate. Per claim 6 the lossy inserts include a dielectric binder material and conductive fillers dispersed within the dielectric binder material (col. 8, lines 50-67). Per claim 8, the socket contacts include signal socket contacts and ground socket contacts (in particular, the lossy inserts 208 function as ground contacts), the signal socket contacts being arranged in pairs (at 704 in figure 7), the ground socket contacts surrounding the pairs of signal socket contacts. Per claim 12, the socket contacts are arranged in rows, the lossy inserts being arranged between corresponding rows of the socket contacts (see figure 2). Per claim 13 the socket contacts are arranged in columns, the lossy inserts being arranged between corresponding columns of the socket contacts (see figure 2). Per claim 14, the upper mating elements are deflectable and define a separable mating interface with the first electrical component. “In an embodiment in which the signal conductor 210 is compressible, the signal conductor 210 may be a lossy material or a conductive polymer. In another embodiment in which the signal conductor 210 is a deflectable beam or a pin, the signal conductor 210 may be a metal or metal alloy.” Col. 8, lines 14-28. Per claim 15, the lower mating elements are deflectable and define a separable mating interface with the second electrical component. “In an embodiment in which the signal conductor 210 is compressible, the signal conductor 210 may be a lossy material or a conductive polymer. In another embodiment in which the signal conductor 210 is a deflectable beam or a pin, the signal conductor 210 may be a metal or metal alloy.” Col. 8, lines 14-28. Per claim 19, Mason discloses a socket connector comprising: a substrate 128 having an upper surface and a lower surface, the substrate having a molded body molded from a low loss dielectric material, the substrate including contact channels 502a between the upper and lower surfaces, the substrate including pockets 502b between the upper and lower surfaces, the pockets located between corresponding contact channels; socket contacts 210 received in corresponding contact channels, each socket contact including a contact body, an upper mating element, and a lower mating element, the upper mating element extending to the upper surface to interface with a first electrical component, the lower mating element extending to the lower surface to interface with a second electrical component; and lossy inserts 208 molded in place (Col. 8, lines 20-40) in the corresponding pockets of the substrate, the lossy inserts being manufactured from lossy material capable of absorbing electrical resonance propagating through the substrate, the lossy inserts located in proximity to the socket contacts. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mason in view of Hou et al. US 12537344 (“Hou”). Regarding claim 7, Mason does not disclose that the lossy material includes the filler material at an amount up to 50% by volume. Hou discloses such a lossy material (“Preferably, the fillers will be present in a sufficient volume percentage to allow conducting paths to be created from particle to particle. For example, when metal fiber is used, the fiber may be present in about 3% to 40% by volume. The amount of filler may impact the conducting properties of the material. Col. 14, lines 25-35). It would have been obvious to form the Mason lossy material with properties such as taught in Hou, including filler material at an amount up to 50% by volume as taught in Hou, as a matter of routine experimentation. The reason would have been to provide a desirable conducting property as taught in Hou. See In re Aller, 105 USPQ 233 (CCPA 1955)(Where general conditions of the claim are disclosed in the prior art, it is not inventive to discover optimal or workable ranges by routine experimentation). Claims 9, 10, and 16-18 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mason. Regarding claim 9, Mason discloses that the socket contacts include signal socket contacts (figure 7, 704) and ground socket contacts (figure 7, 208), the socket contacts being arranged in pair groups, each pair group having a pair of the signal socket contacts surrounded by ground socket contacts forming a shield box around the pair of signal socket contacts (figure 7). Mason discloses that contact sets are set out in a grid array as shown in figure 2, where each set of contacts (see contact groups labeled CG1 and CG2 below) are aligned in rows and/or columns. See annotated figure 2 below. As shown in figure 2, the lossy inserts (labeled Lossy Insert in annotated figure 2 below) are arranged between corresponding contact groups. It would have been obvious to provide the contact group as shown in figure 7, including pairs of signal contacts, in an array of contact groups arranged in rows and/or columns, as shown in figure 2. The result would be that contact groups such as those labeled CG1 and CG2 below would have a lossy insert (labeled Lossy Insert below) located between the contact groups. The reason for providing contact groups as shown in figure 7 in such an array would be to provide multiple signal channels between a first component and second component just as is provided in the configuration of figure 2. PNG media_image2.png 694 962 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 834 1018 media_image3.png Greyscale Per claim 10, lossy inserts are aligned with the pairs of signal socket contacts. Regarding claim 16, Mason discloses a socket connector comprising: a substrate 128 having an upper surface and a lower surface, the substrate including contact channels 502a between the upper and lower surfaces, the substrate including pockets 502b between the upper and lower surfaces, the pockets located between corresponding contact channels; socket contacts (704, 208, in figure 7) received in corresponding contact channels, each socket contact including a contact body, an upper mating element, and a lower mating element, the upper mating element extending to the upper surface to interface with a first electrical component, the lower mating element extending to the lower surface to interface with a second electrical component, wherein the socket contacts include signal socket contacts 704 and ground socket contacts 208, the socket contacts being arranged in pair groups (figure 7), each pair group having a pair of the signal socket contacts surrounded by ground socket contacts forming a shield box around the pair of signal socket contacts. Mason further discloses lossy inserts (elements 208 labeled “lossy insert” annotated figure 2 above) received in the pockets, the lossy inserts being manufactured from lossy material capable of absorbing electrical resonance propagating through the substrate, the lossy inserts being separate and discrete from the substrate and being attached to the substrate in the pockets in proximity to the socket contacts, wherein the lossy inserts are in proximity to each pair group. It would have been obvious to provide the contact group as shown in figure 7, including pairs of signal contacts, in an array of contact groups arranged in rows and/or columns, as shown in figure 2. The result would be that contact groups such as those labeled CG1 and CG2 below would have a lossy insert (labeled Lossy Insert above) located between the contact groups. The reason for providing contact groups as shown in figure 7 in such an array would be to provide multiple signal channels between a first component and second component just as is provided in the configuration of figure 2. Per claim 17 the lossy inserts are arranged between rows of the pair groups. Per claim 18 the lossy inserts are arranged between columns of the pair groups. Regarding claim 20, Mason discloses socket contacts (704, 208, in figure 7) received in corresponding contact channels, each socket contact including a contact body, an upper mating element, and a lower mating element, the upper mating element extending to the upper surface to interface with a first electrical component, the lower mating element extending to the lower surface to interface with a second electrical component, wherein the socket contacts include signal socket contacts 704 and ground socket contacts 208, the socket contacts being arranged in pair groups (figure 7), each pair group having a pair of the signal socket contacts surrounded by ground socket contacts forming a shield box around the pair of signal socket contacts. Mason further discloses lossy inserts (elements 208 labeled “lossy insert” annotated figure 2 above) received in the pockets, the lossy inserts being manufactured from lossy material capable of absorbing electrical resonance propagating through the substrate, the lossy inserts being separate and discrete from the substrate and being attached to the substrate in the pockets in proximity to the socket contacts, wherein the lossy inserts are in proximity to each pair group. It would have been obvious to provide the contact group as shown in figure 7, including pairs of signal contacts, in an array of contact groups arranged in rows and/or columns, as shown in figure 2. The result would be that contact groups such as those labeled CG1 and CG2 below would have a lossy insert (labeled Lossy Insert above) located between the contact groups. The reason for providing contact groups as shown in figure 7 in such an array would be to provide multiple signal channels between a first component and second component just as is provided in the configuration of figure 2. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 11 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROSS GUSHI whose telephone number is (571)272-2005. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday, 8:30 - 5:00. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher Koehler can be reached on 571-272-3560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROSS N GUSHI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 25, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12744341
TERMINAL SOCKET, TERMINAL PIN, TERMINAL SYSTEM, AND TERMINAL ASSEMBLY
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12725968
CONNECTOR
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12725956
Electrical connector comprising two pluralities of flexible strips, one surrounding the other in an inserted configuration of the connector
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12712290
WELDED JOINT ARRANGEMENT FOR COOLED POWER TRANSMISSION
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12700723
RETRACTABLE CABLE DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+2.2%)
1y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1488 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month