Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/645,922

METAL PRODUCTS HAVING IMPROVED SURFACE PROPERTIES AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 25, 2024
Priority
Mar 14, 2018 — provisional 62/642,636 +1 more
Examiner
SIDDIQUI, ADIL ABDUL WAJID
Art Unit
1735
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Novelis Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
69%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allowance Rate
147 granted / 273 resolved
-11.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+15.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
296
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
89.0%
+49.0% vs TC avg
§102
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§112
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 273 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group II (claims 8-10) in the reply filed on 03/03/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 1-7 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 03/03/2026. Status of Claims Pending: claims 1-10 Withdrawn: claims 1-7 Under examination: claims 8-10 Rejected: claims 8-10 Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 8-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sulzer et al. (US 20080083524 A1). PNG media_image1.png 781 642 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 8, with regard to the claimed “A continuous casting system, comprising: a pair of moving opposed casting surfaces;” Sulzer teaches that the invention relates to the continuous casting of molten metals, and a method of introducing the molten metal into the casting cavity of a continuous caster and the design of a metal feeder used for this purpose [0001]. The invention may be used with both horizontal and vertical continuous casting machines, e.g. twin-belt casters [0002], [0026]. The belts are casting surfaces [0002], and are “confronting” (i.e. “opposed”) to each other [0002], [0014] (also see Fig. 1 below). With regard to the claimed “a casting cavity between the pair of moving opposed casting surfaces;” Sulzer teaches that there is a pair of endless casting surfaces confronting each other across a casting cavity [0014]. With regard to the claimed “and a molten metal injector having a molten metal injector nozzle, wherein a top or bottom surface of the molten metal injector nozzle has a distal most end that is positioned at a vertical distance above at least one moving casting surface of the pair of moving opposed casting surfaces” Sulzer teaches that the feeder comprises a nozzle having a projecting tip including at least one wall provided with a molten-metal-contacting inner surface, an outer surface, and an end surface at an outer extremity of the tip extending between the inner and outer surfaces. The inner surface and the end surface interconnect at a line and form an included angle of less than 88 degrees. The wall has a thickness adjacent to the line in the range of 0.5 to 3 mm, and the line is positioned during casting at a spacing from an adjacent casting surface within the range of 0.5 to 3 mm.” [0014], Fig. 2-4, [0040], [0041]. Regarding claim 9, with regard to the claimed “The continuous casting system of claim 8, wherein the vertical distance between the distal most end of the molten metal injector nozzle and the at least one moving casting surface is about 1.4 mm or less.”, Sulzer teaches that “The minimum distance is controlled by restrictions placed on the tip by methods of construction and the need for the tip to be spaced slightly from the casting surface. The preferred spacing (take-off line to casting surface) is about 1 mm+0.5 mm. However, the invention is effective with normal nozzle wall thicknesses (usually about 1 mm or 1/32 inch) and a spacing up to about 3 mm” [0023], which is sufficiently specified in [0048] and [0053]-[0054] (e.g. 1 mm spacing) to anticipate the claimed range of 1.4 mm or less (MPEP 2131.03 I-II.). Regarding claim 10, with regard to the claimed “The continuous casting system of claim 8, wherein the pair of moving opposed casting surfaces is a pair of moving opposed belts”, Sulzer teaches that twin belt caster 10 has upper and lower endless rotating metal belts 12 and 14 arranged so that closely spaced moving confronting casting surfaces 16, 18 of the belts are disposed essentially parallel to each other through a region where they define a casting cavity (casting mold) 20 from a cavity entrance 21 to a cavity exit 22 [0040], Fig. 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Adil Siddiqui whose telephone number is (571)272-8047. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10AM-6PM CST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Keith Walker can be reached at 571-272-3458. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ADIL A. SIDDIQUI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1735
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 25, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637750
HOT-PRESSED MEMBER, STEEL SHEET FOR HOT PRESSING, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING HOT-PRESSED MEMBER
3y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12636656
CRYOGENIC MILLING TECHNIQUES FOR FABRICATION OF NANOSTRUCTURED ELECTRODES
3y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12637734
PROCESS
2y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630928
COMPOSITION, ITS USE FOR ACID PICKLING OF MAGNESIUM ALLOYS AND METHOD FOR ACID PICKLING OF MAGNESIUM ALLOYS
4y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12633437
SOFT MAGNETIC IRON-BASED POWDER AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, AND SOFT MAGNETIC COMPONENT
3y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
69%
With Interview (+15.0%)
3y 5m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 273 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month