Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/645,992

METHOD FOR DATA TRANSMISSION AND DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 25, 2024
Examiner
THIEU, BENJAMIN M
Art Unit
2441
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
513 granted / 611 resolved
+26.0% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
623
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
§103
41.6%
+1.6% vs TC avg
§102
20.9%
-19.1% vs TC avg
§112
9.5%
-30.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 611 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is in response to the original filing of April 25, 2024. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are pending and have been considered as follows. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on April 25, 2024. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2, 5, and 9-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dou et al. (US 2023/0032764 A1, hereinafter Duo), in view of Rossbach et al. (US 12,137,368 B2, hereinafter Rossbach). As to Claim 1, Duo discloses a method for data transmission, comprising: receiving, by a terminal device, first information from a network device, wherein the first information comprises related configurations and/or indications of an application data unit (ADU) ((Duo; [0228, 0229]), where Duo discloses receiving a first information comprising indicators in the streams.); and performing, by the terminal device, transmission of the ADU according to the first information or stopping, by the terminal device, the transmission of the ADU according to the first information ((Duo; [0228, 0229]), where Duo discloses based on the identified indication of the packet, the device can stop/ignore the received streams.). However, Duo does not explicitly disclose an application data unit (ADU). In an analogous art, Rossbach disclose an application data unit (ADU) ((Rossbach; Fig. 7; [0007, 0126]), where Rossbach discloses the stream segments includes a set of ADUs.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Duo to include an application data unit (ADU)as taught by Rossbach to enable how QoS is applied in the application and to data transfers between the UE and the network (Rossbach; [0128]). As to Claim 2, Duo-Rossbach discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the first information comprises at least one of: a data radio bearer (DRB) and/or logical channel (LCH) corresponding to the ADU (Rossbach; [0133-0134]); an LCH parameter corresponding to the ADU (Rossbach; [0133-0134]); a transmission control parameter of the ADU (Rossbach; [0136]); or an indication that the ADU does not meet a configuration requirement (Duo; [0186]), (Rossbach; [0133-0135]). The Examiner provides the same motivation to combine as previously presented in the independent claim. As to Claim 5, Duo-Rossbach discloses the method of claim 1, wherein in case where the terminal device stops the transmission of the ADU, the method further comprises: deleting, by the terminal device, a data packet of the ADU ((Duo; [0260]), where Duo discloses deleting the data/packet in the stream.). As to Claim 9, Duo discloses an access network (AN) device, comprising: a transceiver (Duo; [0052]); a memory configured to store computer-executed instructions (Duo; [0093]); and a processor configured to execute the computer-executed instructions stored in the memory to cause the transceiver to (Duo; [0093]): receive second information from a core network (CN) device, wherein the second information indicates related information of an application data unit (ADU) (Duo; Figs. 1 & 3; [0079, 0083]), where Duo discloses sending/receiving second information.). However, Duo does not explicitly disclose an application data unit (ADU). In an analogous art, Rossbach disclose an application data unit (ADU) ((Rossbach; Fig. 7; [0007, 0126]), where Rossbach discloses the stream segments includes a set of ADUs.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Duo to include an application data unit (ADU)as taught by Rossbach to enable how QoS is applied in the application and to data transfers between the UE and the network (Rossbach; [0128]). As to Claim 10, Duo-Rossbach discloses the AN device of claim 9, wherein the second information comprises at least one of: quality of service (QoS) flow information of the ADU; a transmission requirement of the ADU; an associated indication of the ADU; an associated indication of a QoS flow; an overall transmission requirement of associated ADUs; or a transmission requirement of each ADU in the associated ADUs (Duo; [0119, 0132, 0173]), (Rossbach; Fig. 8; [col. 16, lines 4-18]). The Examiner provides the same motivation to combine as previously presented in the independent claim. As to Claim 11, Duo discloses the AN device of claim 9, wherein the processor is further configured to cause the transceiver to perform at least one of: generating first information according to the second information; or sending the first information to a terminal device ((Duo; Fig. 1; [0131-0135), where Duo discloses transmitting the information the terminal device.). As to Claim 12, Duo discloses the AN device of claim 11, wherein the first information comprises at least one of: a data radio bearer (DRB) and/or logical channel (LCH) corresponding to the ADU (Rossbach; [0133-0134]); an LCH parameter corresponding to the ADU (Rossbach; [0133-0134]); a transmission control parameter of the ADU (Rossbach; [0136]); or an indication that the ADU does not meet a configuration requirement (Duo; [0186]), (Rossbach; [0133-0135]). The Examiner provides the same motivation to combine as previously presented in the independent claim. As to Claim 13, Duo discloses the AN device of claim 9, wherein the CN device is a session management function (SMF) network element (NE) (Duo; [0097, 0173]). As to Claim 14, Duo discloses a core network (CN) device, comprising: a transceiver (Duo; [0052]); a memory configured to store computer-executed instructions (Duo; [0093]); and a processor configured to execute the computer-executed instructions stored in the memory to cause the transceiver to (Duo; [0093]): send second information to an access network (AN) device, wherein the second information indicates related information of an application data unit (ADU) (Duo; Figs. 1 & 3; [0079, 0083]), where Duo discloses sending/receiving second information.). However, Duo does not explicitly disclose an application data unit (ADU). In an analogous art, Rossbach disclose an application data unit (ADU) ((Rossbach; Fig. 7; [0007, 0126]), where Rossbach discloses the stream segments includes a set of ADUs.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Duo to include an application data unit (ADU)as taught by Rossbach to enable how QoS is applied in the application and to data transfers between the UE and the network (Rossbach; [0128]). As to Claim 15, Duo discloses the CN device of claim 14, wherein the processor is further configured to cause the transceiver to perform at least one of: obtaining the related information of the ADU (ADU) ((Duo; [0228, 0229]), where Duo discloses receiving a first information comprising indicators in the streams.); or generating the second information according to the related information of the ADU (Duo; Figs. 1 & 3; [0079, 0083]), where Duo discloses sending/receiving second information.); wherein the second information comprises at least one of: quality of service (QoS) flow information of the ADU; a transmission requirement of the ADU; an associated indication of the ADU; an associated indication of a QoS flow; an overall transmission requirement of associated ADUs; or a transmission requirement of each ADU in the associated ADUs (Duo; [0119, 0132, 0173]), (Rossbach; Fig. 8; [col. 16, lines 4-18]). The Examiner provides the same motivation to combine as previously presented in the independent claim. As to Claim 16, Duo discloses the CN device of claim 14, wherein the related information of the ADU contains at least one of: data stream information of the ADU; QoS flow information of the ADU; a transmission requirement of the ADU; an associated indication of the ADU; an associated indication of a QoS flow (Duo; [0119, 0132, 0173]), (Rossbach; Fig. 8; [col. 16, lines 4-18]); or an associated indication of a data radio bearer (DRB) or radio link control (RLC) (Rossbach; [0133-0134]). As to Claim 17, Duo discloses the CN device of claim 14, wherein the CN device is a session management function (SMF) network element (NE) (Duo; [0097, 0173]). As to Claim 18, Duo discloses the CN device of claim 15, wherein in terms of obtaining the related information of the ADU, the processor is configured to cause the transceiver to: obtain the related information of the ADU from a policy control function (PCF) NE and/or an application function (AF) NE (Duo; [0097]), (Rossbach; Fig. 6; [col. 14, lines 17-49]). The Examiner provides the same motivation to combine as previously presented in the independent claim. As to Claim 19, Duo discloses a terminal device, comprising: a transceiver (Duo; [0052]), a processor (Duo; [0093]), and a memory storing computer-executed instructions (Duo; [0093]); and wherein the computer-executed instructions stored in the memory are configured to perform the method of claim 1 when executed by the processor (Duo; [0093]). As to Claim 20, Duo discloses the terminal device of claim 19, wherein the first information comprises at least one of: a data radio bearer (DRB) and/or logical channel (LCH) corresponding to the ADU; an LCH parameter corresponding to the ADU; a transmission control parameter of the ADU; or an indication that the ADU does not meet a configuration requirement (Duo; [0004, 0033, 0073]). Allowable Subject Matter Claim(s) 3-4, 6-8 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892. The examiner also requests, in response to this Office action, support be shown for language added to any original claims on amendment and any new claims. That is, indicate support for newly added claim language by specifically pointing to page(s) and line no(s) in the specification and/or drawing figure(s). This will assist the examiner in prosecuting the application. When responding to this office action, Applicant is advised to clearly point out the patentable novelty which he or she thinks the claims present, in view of the state of the art disclosed by the references cited or the objections made. He or she must also show how the amendments avoid such references or objections See 37 CFR 1.111(c). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BENJAMIN M THIEU whose telephone number is (571) 270-7475 and fax number is (571) 270-8475. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday: 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Wing Chan can be reached at 571-272-7493. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BENJAMIN M THIEU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2441 12.19.2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 25, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 24, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592995
SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING AND SCREENING INCOMING CALLS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587478
Software Assisted Implementation of Congestion Signaling
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581447
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580784
SHARED AUGMENTED REALITY EXPERIENCE IN VIDEO CHAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12556609
COMMUNICATION METHOD, REFRIGERATION AND AIR CONDITIONING-RELATED SYSTEM, AND COMMUNICATION NODE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.9%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 611 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month