Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/646,276

Electrode for Electrochemical Device Comprising Dry Electrode Film and Method for Manufacturing the Same

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 25, 2024
Priority
Aug 06, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0104169 +2 more
Examiner
MARTIN, ANGELA J
Art Unit
1727
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
36%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
599 granted / 890 resolved
+2.3% vs TC avg
Minimal -32% lift
Without
With
+-31.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 12m
Avg Prosecution
56 currently pending
Career history
958
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
66.8%
+26.8% vs TC avg
§102
23.9%
-16.1% vs TC avg
§112
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 890 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 5-12 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Group II, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 6/23/2026. Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I (claims 1-4 and 13-16) in the reply filed on 6/23/2026 is acknowledged. The pending claims are claims 1-4 and 13-16. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4 and 13-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Carlson et al., US 20200395583. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim(s) 1-4 and 13-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Carlson et al., US 20200395583. Regarding claim 1, Carlson et al., teaches an electrode (0079; 0105-0111) for an electrochemical device (0004), comprising: a free-standing type electrode film (0013; 0029; 0079; 0242), wherein the free-standing type electrode film comprises an active material (0079; 0102; 0242), a conductive material (0177; 0181; 0222), and a binder resin (0081-0082), wherein the binder resin contained in the free-standing type electrode film has a crystallinity of 10% or less. Carlson does not teach a crystallinity of 10% or less. However, “10% or less” would range from 10% to zero. Therefore, since no crystallinity range is described in Carlson, the zero crystallinity would read on claim 1. Regarding claim 2, Carlson et al., teaches wherein the free-standing type electrode film has a tensile elongation of 2% or more and 30% or less (2% elongation; 0005) (15% elongation; 0012) (0206). Regarding claim 3, Carlson et al., teaches wherein the free-standing type electrode film has a tensile strength of 0.5 Mpa (72.5 psi) or more and 10.0 Mpa (1450.4 psi) or less in the machine direction (MD); Carlson teaches 750 psi (5.17 Mpa) (0012; 0212; 0219; 0229; 0235 of Carlson). Regarding claim 4, Carlson et al., teaches wherein the free-standing type electrode film has a porosity of 47.3% to 50.7% (Table 7). Regarding claim 13, Carlson et al., teaches wherein the binder resin comprises polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) (0022; 0081-0082), polyolefin (0078; 0184; 0186), or a mixture of two or more of them. Regarding claim 14, Carlson et al., teaches further comprises a current collector (0185), wherein the free-standing type electrode film is disposed on at least one surface or both surfaces of the current collector (0185). Regarding claim 15, Carlson et al., teaches a method for manufacturing the electrode for an electrochemical device according to claim 5, which further comprises preparing a current collector (0185), disposing the free-standing type electrode film on at least one surface of the current collector (0185) and carrying out lamination (0031; 0246; 0252). Regarding claim 16, Carlson et al., teaches secondary battery (0003-0004) comprising the free-standing type electrode (0006; 0029; 0079) as defined in claim 1, wherein the dry electrode is a positive electrode (00228; 0271-0272), and an electrode assembly (0097) comprising the positive electrode (0105-0111), a negative electrode (0105-0111) and a separator is received in a battery casing (0100; 0102) together with a lithium-containing non-aqueous electrolyte (0010; 0014; 0033). Thus, the claims are anticipated. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANGELA J MARTIN whose telephone number is (571)272-1288. The examiner can normally be reached 7am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Barbara Gilliam can be reached at 571-272-1330. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. ANGELA J. MARTIN Examiner Art Unit 1727 /ANGELA J MARTIN/Examiner, Art Unit 1727
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 25, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12731790
Carbon Nanotube Dispersion, and Negative Electrode Slurry, Negative Electrode, and Lithium Secondary Battery Including the Same
4y 11m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12712241
High-Strength Separator
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12671078
Rechargeable Alkaline Manganese Dioxide-Zinc Bipolar Batteries
7y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671076
Method for Preparing Positive Electrode Active Material for Secondary Battery
5y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12631565
Secondary Battery Having Lead Film Including Luminous Material and Method of Inspecting Defects of Secondary Battery
6y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
36%
With Interview (-31.5%)
3y 12m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 890 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month