Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/646,960

INKJET RECORDING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 26, 2024
Priority
Apr 27, 2023 — JP 2023-072841
Examiner
VALENCIA, ALEJANDRO
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Kyocera Document Solutions Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
43%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
49%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 43% of resolved cases
43%
Career Allowance Rate
584 granted / 1359 resolved
-25.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
104 currently pending
Career history
1502
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
54.9%
+14.9% vs TC avg
§102
24.7%
-15.3% vs TC avg
§112
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1359 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Claim 4 is withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 12/4/2025. Claim Objections Claim 5 is objected to because of the following informalities: “the supply part makes the cleaning liquid on contact with an inner wall” is grammatically incorrect. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3 and 5-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Akuta (2015/0273836) in view of Park et al. (5,933,172). Regarding claim 1, Akuta teaches an ink jet recording apparatus comprising: an inkjet head (fig. 2, item 22) provided with a nozzle surface (fig. 2, item 24) on which ink ejection ports (fig. 5, items 23) of a plurality of nozzles are opened downward; a supply path (fig. 6, path including step portions 32a, 33, 42) through which a cleaning liquid is supplied ([0072]); a blade (fig. 5, item 34) movable in contact with the nozzle surface (see fig. 5); and a cleaning liquid supply member (fig. 3, item 42) which supplies the cleaning liquid supplied through the supply path to at least one of the nozzle surface and the blade (see fig. 6). Akuta does not teach wherein the cleaning liquid supply member has at least one supply hole through which the cleaning liquid is supplied and wherein the supply path has a supply part inserted into the supply hole. Park teaches a reciprocating carriage that is refillable with liquid at one end of its path by inserting a supply part into a supply hole (Park, see figs. 3, 4, Note supply part inserted into top of container with tapered opening, i.e., cleaning liquid supply member with supply hole). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the refilling arrangement disclosed by Park in the device disclosed by Akuta because doing so would amount to the simple substitution of one known liquid refilling configuration for another to obtain predictable results. Upon combination of the teachings, the carriage of Akuta would have a reservoir with a supply path and a supply member and containing cleaning fluid. (Examiner is aware that Park is directed to refilling of ink in an ink container while Akuta is directed to refilling of a cleaning fluid in a cleaning fluid container. Nonetheless, Examiner maintains it would have been obvious to one of skill in the art to apply the configuration of Park to any reciprocating carriage requiring liquid refilling at one end of its path). Regarding claim 2, Akuta in view of Park teaches the inkjet recording apparatus according to claim 1, wherein an inner dimension of the supply hole is increased upward (Park, see fig. 3, Note tapered opening of unlabeled liquid-containing tank). Regarding claim 3, Akuta in view of Park teaches the inkjet recording apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the supply hole has a portion whose inner dimension is smaller than an outer dimension of the supply part except for an upper end of the supply hole (Park, see figs. 3, 4). Regarding claim 5, Akuta in view of Park teaches the inkjet recording apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the supply part makes the cleaning liquid in contact with an inner wall of the supply hole (Park, see figs. 3, 4). Regarding claim 6, Akuta in view of Park teaches the inkjet recording apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the supply part is inserted into the supply hole until its tip end reaches a lower end of the supply hole (Park, see figs. 3, 4). Regarding claim 7, Akuta in view of Park teaches the inkjet recording apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising: a cleaning liquid supply mechanism (Akuta, see fig. 3, note that tube 42 transports liquid via a pump from a tank) which is disposed separated away from the inkjet head and supplies the cleaning liquid to the cleaning liquid supply member (Akuta, see fig. 3), wherein the cleaning liquid supply member is supplied with the cleaning liquid from the cleaning liquid supply mechanism (see fig. 6), is then separated away from the cleaning liquid supply mechanism (Akuta, fig. 3, Park, figs. 3, 4) and moved to a position where it can be in contact with the nozzle surface while holding the supplied cleaning liquid, and the supply part is inserted into the supply hole at the position (Akuta, see figs. 2-6, Note that, upon combination as detailed in claim 1, the limitation would be met). Regarding claim 8, Akuta in view of Park teaches the inkjet recording apparatus according to claim 5, further comprising: a wipe unit (Akuta, fig. 4, item 36) including the blade and the cleaning liquid supply member (Akuta, see fig. 6), wherein as the wipe unit moves, the blade and the cleaning liquid supply member are moved (Note that, as defined in claim 1, the limitation is met). Regarding claim 9, Akuta in view of Park teaches the inkjet recording apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising: a wipe unit including the blade (Akuta, fig. 4, item 36), the cleaning liquid supply member, and a waste liquid tray Akuta, fig. 3, item 46) disposed below the blade and the cleaning liquid supply member to receive the cleaning liquid falling from the cleaning liquid supply member and the ink wiped by the blade (Akuta, see fig. 3), wherein when the cleaning liquid supply member is moved, the waste liquid tray is kept at a position below the cleaning liquid supply member (Akuta, see fig. 3). Regarding claim 10, Akuta in view of Park teaches the inkjet recording apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the supply part can be moved to a separated position where a tip end is separated from the supply hole (Akuta, see fig. 3), an insertion position located in the supply hole, and a penetration position protruding from the supply hole (Akuta, see figs. 3, 6). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEJANDRO VALENCIA whose telephone number is (571)270-5473. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DOUGLAS X. RODRIGUEZ can be reached at 571-431-0716. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEJANDRO VALENCIA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 26, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703191
INKJET PRINTING EQUIPMENT
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12661894
LIQUID DISCHARGING APPARATUS
4y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661914
HEAD LIFTING LOWERING DEVICE, CONTROL METHOD OF HEAD LIFTING LOWERING DEVICE, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM, MANUFACTURING METHOD OF HEAD LIFTING LOWERING DEVICE
4y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661890
DROPLET EJECTION HEAD AND PRINTER
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661897
LIQUID EJECTING APPARATUS
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
43%
Grant Probability
49%
With Interview (+6.0%)
3y 0m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1359 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month