Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/647,290

FRINGE LINE DETECTION AND PHASE UNWRAPPING METHOD AND SYSTEM BASED ON FL-NET CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 26, 2024
Priority
Jul 12, 2023 — CN 2023108520554
Examiner
KELLEY, CHRISTOPHER S
Art Unit
2482
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
UNIVERSITY OF ELECTRONIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
24%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
42%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 24% of cases
24%
Career Allowance Rate
11 granted / 45 resolved
-33.6% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
6 currently pending
Career history
53
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
80.2%
+40.2% vs TC avg
§102
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
§112
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 45 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sartor et al. (2008/0234981) in view of Boudreaux et al. (2022/0092812). Regarding claim 1, Sartor et al teach a fringe line detection and phase unwrapping method comprising: detecting fringe lines (boundaries and edges of fringe) of an input image to obtain an image with detected fringe lines (paragraphs 74-86 where edges and boundaries are fringe lines in the interferogram and steps 124-130 if figure 14); performing circulation integral on the detected fringe lines to repair the detected fringe lines to thereby obtain an image with repaired fringe lines (paragraphs 94-97 note integral over arc length); performing path integral on the repaired fringe lines to unwrap the repaired fringe lines to thereby obtain an image with unwrapped fringe lines (integrated over limits of the maximum fringe length) ; and identifying error points of the unwrapped fringe lines (paragraphs 105-107 note 20 iterations will correct data points); and processing the error points to obtain an output result (figure 29). While Sartor fails to specifically teach the use of a convolutional neural network, Boudreaux et al do. See figure 20 and paragraphs 98+. Since both systems are in the same field of endeavor and phase unwrap Sar images into height, it would have been obvious at the time of filing to implement the fringe line detection / phase unwrapping of Sartor on a CNN as taught by Boudreaux et al. to modernize the calculations of Sartor and allow for faster processing of the SAR images. Claim 8 is rejected for similar reasons in that, the processing units claims are equivalent to those taught in Boudreaux. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claims 2-7 contain specific limitations not found in the prior art. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Saied et al. and Zhou et al. are cited as teaching fringe line detection and phase unwrapping of SAR images. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER S KELLEY whose telephone number is (571)272-7331. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 6:30 to 4 pm alternate Fridays off. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amy Johnson can be reached at 571-272-2238. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER S KELLEY/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2482
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 26, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 11, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12608842
INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT, AND WELDING SYSTEM
2y 9m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12518579
INTELLIGENT LOCK AND USE METHOD THEREOF
2y 6m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12518561
CONFIDENCE SCORE DETERMINATION FOR FACIAL IMAGE BASED FAMILY RECOGNITION
2y 8m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12457363
IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE AND METHOD
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 28, 2025
Patent 12412411
TRAINING OF MACHINE LEARNING MODELS USING CONTENT MASKING TECHNIQUES
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 09, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
24%
Grant Probability
42%
With Interview (+17.5%)
3y 2m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 45 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month