Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/647,617

BINDING MACHINE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 26, 2024
Examiner
GHORISHI, SEYED BEHROOZ
Art Unit
1748
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Max Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
240 granted / 348 resolved
+4.0% vs TC avg
Strong +44% interview lift
Without
With
+44.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
392
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
49.0%
+9.0% vs TC avg
§102
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
§112
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 348 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Detailed Office Action The communication dated 11/10/2025 has been entered and fully considered. Claim 6 is withdrawn from examination. Claims 1-14 remain pending. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species A (claim 3) in the reply filed on 11/10/2025 is acknowledged. Claim 6 is withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Species B. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2 and 7-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by HAYASHI (US-2017/0359972), hereinafter HAYASHI. Note that the italicized text below are the instant claims. Regarding claim 1, HAYASHI discloses A binding machine configured to wind and bind an object to be bound with a band-shaped tape {[abstract], [FIG. 20] S is the object that bound by tape 60}, the binding machine comprising: a tape holder configured to hold a first end that is one end of a first part that is a part of the tape {[0059] note tape holding, [FIG. 13] 16 is the tape holder that is holding the first end 60a of tape 60}; and a tape remover configured to abut against the first end and configured to remove the tape from the tape holder {[0072]-[0074], [FIG. 19] 35 is the tape remover that abuts the first end of tape 60 and removes it from holder 16 that was discussed in the above limitation}. Regarding claim 2, HAYASHI discloses further comprising: a tape holding releaser configured to release a first end holding state in which the first end is held by the tape holder, wherein the tape remover is configured to remove the tape after the tape holding releaser releases the first end holding state {[0080] the lock member 39 is the releaser and its described disengagement relates to its release functionality}. Regarding claim 7, HAYASHI discloses wherein the tape holder includes a tape support configured to support the first end and a tape presser configured to press the first end against the tape support, and the tape holder is configured to hold the tape by clamping the tape with the tape support and the tape presser {[0061] 16c is interpreted as the tape presser (note the flat surface that presses on the tape), 16e is interpreted as the support and the end of the tape is held by 16 as described under claim 1}. Regarding claim 8, HAYASHI discloses wherein the tape support has an opening that opens along a direction in which the first end is supported by the tape support, and the tape remover is insertable into the opening {[0061] note slit 16b is the opening and that allows part of the remover (gripping member 37) to advance into}. Regarding claim 9, HAYASHI discloses wherein the tape remover and the tape holding releaser are integrally formed {[FIG. 18] note 39 and 35 are integral in the case 41}. Regarding claim 10, HAYASHI discloses wherein the tape presser includes a top end that is provided at one end of the tape presser and that is configured to come into contact with the first end, a base end that is provided at another end of the tape presser, and a fulcrum that is provided between the top end and the base end, and the top end is rotatable about the fulcrum {[FIG. 8A] note the top of 16 and the bottom or the base of 16, 16a is where the fulcrum is inserted and thus rotation, [0059] note rocking shaft 19 that is inserted into 16a is the fulcrum}. Regarding claim 11, HAYASHI discloses further comprising: a tape holding releaser configured to release a first end holding state in which the first end is held by the tape holder, wherein the tape presser rotates when the tape holding releaser abuts against the base end, and the first end holding state is released {see claims 2 and 10 above}. Regarding claim 12, HAYASHI discloses wherein the tape remover is configured to remove the tape from the tape holder by moving after abutting against the first end {[FIGs. 18 & 19] note the movement of 35 and removing the tape 60 from 16 in an upward movement}. Regarding claim 13, HAYASHI discloses wherein the tape remover is a protrusion {[FIG. 10] 37c is the protrusion}. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-5 and 14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claim 3, HAYASHI fails to disclose that the tape remover is configured to remove the tape in a direction intersecting a longitudinal direction of the tape (emphasis added by the Examiner). Clearly, the tape remover of HAYASHI (35) removes the tape from the holder (16) in an upward and longitudinal direction of tape 60 {[FIG. 19]}. It is not functional to have modified the machine of HAYASHI to implement the removal in an intersecting or traverse manner. Claims 4-5 are dependent on claim 3 and contain the allowable subject matter as well. Regarding claim 14, HAYASHI fails to disclose that the tape remover is provided at a position higher than a lower end of the tape holding releaser (emphasis added by the Examiner). In order to function properly, the tape remover 35 of HAYASHI has to be located at a position lower with respect to its releaser 39 {[FIG. 19]}. It is not functional to have modified the machine of HAYASHI to change the position of these two devices. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to S. BEHROOZ GHORISHI whose telephone number is (571)272-1373. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-(alt Fri) 7:30-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abbas Rashid can be reached at 571-270-7457. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /S. BEHROOZ GHORISHI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1748
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 26, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12583161
INJECTION MOLDING METHOD AND INJECTION MOLDING MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12568763
METHOD FOR TRANSFERRING A LAYER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12558828
INJECTION MOLDING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12552112
AUTOMATED FIBER PLACEMENT ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12544970
LINK MECHANISM, LINK DEVICE, AND STRETCHING MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+44.3%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 348 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month