Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 29, 2026
Application No. 18/647,730

SYSTEM FOR REMOVING PER- AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES (PFAS) FROM A SOLUTION HAVING PFAS THEREIN USING FOAM FRACTIONATION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 26, 2024
Priority
Apr 27, 2023 — provisional 63/462,398
Examiner
KURTZ, BENJAMIN M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Emerging Compounds Treatment Technologies Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
74%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allowance Rate
643 granted / 1130 resolved
-3.1% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
1175
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
47.2%
+7.2% vs TC avg
§102
20.5%
-19.5% vs TC avg
§112
26.7%
-13.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1130 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of group IV, claims 23-25 in the reply filed on 7/21/26 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 23-25 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Rudolph et al. US 2026/0015258. Claim 23, Rudolph teaches a method for removing long-chain and short chain PFAS from a solution having PFAS therein using foam fractionation, the method comprising: receiving the solution having PFAS therein and generating microbubbles (par 35), turbulence (par 60) and foam (abstract) to remove a majority of long-chain PFAS, generating a treated flow of a solution having a majority of the long-chain PFAS removed, introducing a foam boosting agent (par 56-57) into the treated flow (par 50, 58), receiving the treated solution having a majority of the long-chain PFAS removed and the foam boosting agent and generating microbubbles, turbulence and foam, the foam boosting agent configured to augment the formation of foam to facilitate the removal of short-chain PFAS and generating a treated flow of a solution having a majority of the long-chain and short-chain PFAS removed (par 10-12, 31, 53, 88). Claims 24-25, Rudolph further teaches the foam boosting agent includes a supplemental surfactant including anionic, cationic, zwitterionic and nonionic surfactants (par 57). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BENJAMIN M KURTZ whose telephone number is (571)272-8211. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bobby Ramdhanie can be reached at 571-270-3240. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BENJAMIN M KURTZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1779
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 26, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12728373
WATER FILTER CARTRIDGE AND HEAD HAVING KEYED ENGAGEMENT
5y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12715785
FILTER ASSEMBLY
4y 0m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12716481
FILTER ASSEMBLY
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12709562
Dewatering Method And System
5y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12678718
FILTER ELEMENT WITH BIPLANAR O-RING
4y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
74%
With Interview (+17.3%)
3y 1m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1130 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month