Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/648,035

WORKPIECE CARRIER, TRANSPORT SYSTEM WITH SEVERAL SUCH WORKPIECE CARRIERS, AND USE FOR THE SEPARATION OF WORKPIECES, IN PARTICULAR IN BATTERY PRODUCTION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 26, 2024
Examiner
GONZALEZ, LUIS A
Art Unit
3653
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Grob-Werke GmbH & Co. Kg
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
885 granted / 1044 resolved
+32.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1078
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
40.1%
+0.1% vs TC avg
§102
38.6%
-1.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1044 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Okamoto et al. JP 2018-152447A (hereinafter “Okamoto”). Regarding claim 1, Okamoto discloses a workpiece carrier (1) for taking over, transporting and transferring a workpiece formed as a segment of a material web, the workpiece carrier comprising: a support surface (41a, refer to FIG. 6) formed on a carrier body (30 or 41) for placing the workpiece on, and a suction device (6) for sucking the workpiece onto the support surface, the suction device having at least one movable suction nozzle which protrudes from the support surface in a rest position (FIG. 6a) and, when subjected to vacuum, is configured to be moved against a force holding the at least one movable suction nozzle in the rest position into a retracted position (FIG. 6b) in which the at least one movable suction nozzle does not protrude beyond the support surface. Regarding claim 2, wherein the suction device has at least one first air circuit (suction connection with a vacuum pump) with at least one first suction nozzle for sucking the workpiece onto the support surface and a second air circuit (refer to Fig. 1 showing multiple section of 30, wherein another of 30 includes another suction connection with a vacuum pump, or alternatively another suction device 6 in the same member 30) another with at least one second suction nozzle (6) for sucking the workpiece onto the support surface, wherein the first and second air circuit are configured to be controlled differently (independently). Regarding claim 3, wherein that the at least one first suction nozzle is designed as a first movable suction nozzle, or wherein the at least one second suction nozzle is designed as a second movable suction nozzle, or both. Regarding claim 4, wherein the at least one first suction nozzle is arranged upstream (6 of most upstream 30 in FIG. 1) of the at least one second suction nozzle (6 of a downstream 30 in FIG. 1) in a transport direction. Regarding claim 5, wherein the first air circuit has a first air chamber (interpreted as opening formed to accommodate 6) in the carrier body, and at least one first movable suction nozzle connected to the first air chamber, and wherein the second air circuit has a second air chamber in the carrier body and at least one second movable suction nozzle connected to the second air chamber. Regarding claim 6, wherein the first air chamber has a first air connection at a side (implicit, on the lower side of 6, as suction is generated in 6 to contract) or on a side of the carrier body opposite the support surface and the second air chamber has a second air connection at a side (implicit, on the lower side of 6, as suction is generated in 6 to contract) or or on a side of the carrier body opposite the support surface. Regarding claim 7, wherein air connections of the first and second air circuits are offset relative to each other in a transport direction (assuming one member 6 is in upstream member 30, and another of 6 is in downstream member 30). Regarding claim 8, wherein the workpiece carrier is configured as a transport unit of a transport system with individually movable transport units. Regarding claim 9, a transport system comprising: a guide track (31a) and a plurality of workpiece carriers (30) according to claim 1, the workpiece carriers individually movable along the guide track (31a) as transport units. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 11-13 are allowed. Claim 10 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LUIS A GONZALEZ whose telephone number is (571)270-3094. The examiner can normally be reached 9am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael McCullough can be reached at 571-272-7805. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LUIS A GONZALEZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3653
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 26, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600592
MEDIUM EJECTION APPARATUS INCLUDING EJECTION TRAY FORMED WITH RECESSED PART AND BEAM PART
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600587
MEDIUM FEED APPARATUS TO ADVANCE SUCCEEDING SHEET OF MEDIUM WHEN PRECEDING SHEET OF MEDIUM PASSES PICK ROLLER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12583143
SHEET PROCESSING MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577002
GRASPING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INSERTING SEPARATION SHEETS IN A RECEPTACLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577077
SHEET REMOVER, CONVEYING DEVICE, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+4.6%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1044 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month