Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/648,245

METHOD FOR ESTABLISHING ELECTRICAL CONNECTION, CAMERA MODULE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE HAVING THE CAMERA MODULE

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Apr 26, 2024
Priority
Dec 07, 2023 — CN 202311690956.4
Examiner
BERARDESCA, PAUL M
Art Unit
2637
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Triple Win Technology (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
644 granted / 816 resolved
+16.9% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
835
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
74.6%
+34.6% vs TC avg
§102
13.3%
-26.7% vs TC avg
§112
7.8%
-32.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 816 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 8, and 14 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the first connection pad having the first and second section and being located on the lens assembly (claim 2) must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Objections Claims 12 and 13 are objected to because of the following informalities: The limitation “… the boding matrix…” should be changed to “…the bonding matrix…”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 2, 5-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Regarding claim 2, it states that the first connection pad is arranged on the first body which is part of the lens assembly and the second connection pad is arranged on the second body which is part of the circuit board. There is no disclosure for this in the specification as originally filed. Specifically, claim 1, from which claim 2 depends, states that the first connection pad comprises the first and second section. Therefore, according to the specification, the claimed first connection pad must correspond to the first connection pad 11 in the specification. As described in the specification and clearly shown in the drawings, the first connection pad 11 is located on flexible board 22 and not on the lens assembly 30. Rather, the specification describes that the second connection pad 12 is provided on the lens assembly 30. As there is no disclosure for the claimed invention in the specification as originally filed it is unclear how this is arrangement is possible or how it would work. If Applicant were to swap “the first connection pad” and “the second connection pad” in claim 2, it would overcome this rejection. However, the claim would be rejected just as claim 8 is below (see prior art rejections.) Regarding claims 5-7, they depend from claim 2 and are therefore rejected for the same reasons as stated above (see claim 2). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee et al. (US 2016/0374200 A1) hereinafter referenced as Lee in view of Kani et al. (US 2023/0056922 A1) hereinafter referenced as Kani. Regarding claim 1, Lee discloses A method for establishing electrical connection, comprising: providing a pre-bonding assembly, wherein the pre-bonding assembly comprises a first connection pad (12; fig. 3), a second connection pad (230; fig. 3), and an insulating layer (100; fig. 3), the first connection pad comprises a first section (Section of 12 not covered by insulating layer 100; fig. 3) and a second section (Section of 12 covered by insulating layer 100; fig. 3) connected to the first section, the first section is spaced apart from the second connection pad (By the thickness of ACF 300; fig. 3; [0037]), the second section is staggered relative to the second connection pad, and the insulating layer covers the second section (fig. 3); placing an activatable conductive film (300; fig. 3) between the first section and the second connection pad, the activatable conductive film comprising a plurality of conductive particles electrically isolated from each other (This is inherent to anisotropic conductive film; [0037]); pressing the first section, the second connection pad, and the activatable conductive film together, causing the activatable conductive film to become an activated conductive film, a portion of the activated conductive film extending into the insulating layer, wherein the plurality of conductive particles in the activated conductive film is connected to each other to form a conductive pathway, the conductive pathway electrically connects the first section to the second connection pad (This is inherent to anisotropic conductive film and also the only method to allow conduction between the first and second pad using the anisotropic conductive film as this is how ACFs work.), and the insulating layer electrically isolates the second section from the second connection pad (As the insulating layer 100 covers the second section, it has inherently isolated the second section from the second connection pad; fig. 3); wherein the activatable conductive film (300; fig. 3) further comprises an adhesive (Solder cream; [0052]), the plurality of conductive particles is dispersed within the adhesive, the method further comprises. However, Lee, fails to explicitly disclose heating and curing the adhesive to form a bonding matrix. However, the examiner maintains that it was well known in the art to provide this, as taught by Kani. In a similar field of endeavor, Kani discloses heating and curing the adhesive to form a bonding matrix (182; fig. 4A), wherein the bonding matrix defines a thickness direction, the conductive pathway is electrically connected to the first section (130, 150; fig. 4A) and the second connection pad (142; fig. 4A) along the thickness direction ([0040]; fig. 4A). Lee teaches using solder cream to conductively adhere two pads. Kani teaches using an anisotropic film including an adhesive matrix to conductively adhere two pads. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to substitute the solder cream with the anisotropic film of Kani to achieve the predictable result of conductively connecting two pads. Claim(s) 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee in view of Kani further in view of Xu (WO 2022/218225) (corresponding US 2024/0040219 used for citations). Regarding claim 2, Lee and Kani, the combination, discloses everything claimed as applied above (see claim 1), in addition, Lee discloses, wherein the pre-bonding assembly further comprises a [first body] and a circuit board assembly, the [first body] comprises a first body (200; fig. 3), the first connection pad (12; fig. 3) is arranged on the first body (After connection it can be said that it is on the body 200; fig. 3), the circuit board assembly comprises a second body (110, 100; fig. 3), and the second connection pad is arranged on the second body (After connection it can be said that it is on the body 100, 110; fig. 3). However, Lee fails to explicitly disclose a lens assembly. However, the examiner maintains that it was well known in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to provide this, as taught by Xu. In a similar field of endeavor, Xu discloses wherein the pre-bonding assembly further comprises a lens assembly…the lens assembly comprises a first body (fig. 3). Lee teaches an assembly including connection pads which is connected to a circuit board assembly using the connection pads. Xu teaches a lens assembly including connection pads which is connected to an external element using the connection pads. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to substitute the undisclosed assembly of Lee with the lens assembly of Xu to achieve the predictable result of being able to transmit signals to or from the lens assembly to an external processor. Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee in view of Kani further in view of Official Notice. Regarding claim 4, Lee and Kani, the combination, discloses everything claimed as applied above (see claim 1), in addition, Kani discloses, wherein the plurality of conductive particles is made from [metal], and the adhesive is made from epoxy resins, polyimides, or phenolic resins ([0040]). However, the combination fails to explicitly disclose what type of metal the conductive particles are. However, the examiner takes official notice of the fact that it was well known in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to provide this. The combination teaches the plurality of conductive particles of the anisotropic film are metal. Gold, nickel, silver, and copper are all well-known conductive metals. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to substitute the undisclosed type of metal with one of gold, nickel, silver, or copper to achieve the predictable result of creating an electric connection. Claim(s) 5-7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee in view of Kani further in view of Xu further in view of Siddique (US 2017/0048977 A1). Regarding claim 5, Lee, Kani, and Xu, the combination, discloses everything claimed as applied above (see claim 2), however, the combination, fails to explicitly disclose the heat press machine. However, the examiner maintains that it was well known in the art to provide this, as taught by Siddique. In a similar field of endeavor, Siddique discloses wherein of the pressing comprises: providing a heat press machine (fig.2), wherein the heat press machine comprises a base (26; fig. 2) and a heating head (30; fig. 2); placing the pre-bonding assembly (12, 16; fig .2) and the activatable conductive film (18; fig. 2) between the base and the heating head, wherein the base supports the first body (10; fig. 2), the second body (14; fig. 2) faces the heating head, the activatable conductive film is placed between the first section (16; fig. 2) and the second connection pad (12; fig. 2); moving the heating head towards the base, causing the heating head to apply pressure onto the second body and the base to apply pressure onto the first body, thereby causing the activatable conductive film to become the activated conductive film ([0037]-[0038]). The combination teaches activating the anisotropic film by applying heat and pressure, but is silent on the device used to apply this. Siddique teaches a heat press for applying heat and pressure used to bond two circuit boards to each other with anisotropic film. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to substitute the undisclosed device applying heat and pressure in the combination with the heat press device of Siddique to achieve the predictable result of bonding the two circuit boards using anisotropic film. Regarding claim 6, Lee, Kani, Xu, and Siddique, the combination, discloses everything claimed as applied above (see claim 5), in addition, Siddique discloses, further comprising: placing a first cushioning pad (28; fig. 2) between the heating head (30; fig. 2) and the second body (14; fig. 2); and placing a second cushioning pad (32; fig. 2) between the base (26; fig. 2) and the first body (10; fig. 2). The combination teaches activating the anisotropic film by applying heat and pressure, but is silent on the device used to apply this. Siddique teaches a heat press for applying heat and pressure used to bond two circuit boards to each other with anisotropic film wherein the heat press includes a first and second cushioning pad. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to substitute the undisclosed device applying heat and pressure in the combination with the heat press device of Siddique to achieve the predictable result of bonding the two circuit boards using anisotropic film while achieving uniform thermal energy distribution as taught by Siddique ([0038]). Regarding claim 7, Lee, Kani, Xu, and Siddique, the combination, discloses everything claimed as applied above (see claim 6), in addition, Siddique discloses, wherein the first cushioning pad is made of silicone, and the second cushioning pad is made of rubber or polyurethane ([0043]; Cushions 28, 32 may be formed of a silicone-based material such as silicone rubber.). The combination teaches activating the anisotropic film by applying heat and pressure, but is silent on the device used to apply this. Siddique teaches a heat press for applying heat and pressure used to bond two circuit boards to each other with anisotropic film wherein the heat press includes a first and second cushioning pad. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to substitute the undisclosed device applying heat and pressure in the combination with the heat press device of Siddique to achieve the predictable result of bonding the two circuit boards using anisotropic film while achieving uniform thermal energy distribution as taught by Siddique ([0038]). Claim(s) 8-11, 14-17, 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee in view of Xu. Regarding claim 8, Lee discloses A a circuit board assembly (100, 12, 110; fig. 3) comprising a first connection pad (12; fig. 3) and an insulating layer (100; fig. 3), the first connection pad comprising a first section (Section of 12 not covered by insulating layer 100; fig. 3) and a second section (Section of 12 covered by insulating layer 100; fig. 3), the insulating layer covering the second section (fig. 3); a[n] (200; fig. 3) comprising a second connection pad (230; fig. 3), wherein the second connection pad corresponds to the first section (fig. 3), the second section is staggered from the second connection pad (fig. 3); an activated conductive film (300; fig. 3) positioned between the first connection pad and the second connection pad, the activated conductive film comprising a conductive pathway (solder cream; [0052]), wherein the conductive pathway electrically connects the first section and the second connection pad (solder cream; [0052]), and the insulating layer electrically isolates the second section from the second connection pad (fig. 3). However, Lee fails to explicitly disclose the assembly is a lens assembly. However, the examiner maintains that it was well known in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to provide this, as taught by Xu. A camera module, comprising (fig. 3)…a lens assembly (fig. 3) comprising a second connection pad (20; fig. 3). Lee teaches an assembly including connection pads which is connected to a circuit board assembly using the connection pads. Xu teaches a lens assembly including connection pads which is connected to an external element using the connection pads. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to substitute the undisclosed assembly of Lee with the lens assembly of Xu to achieve the predictable result of being able to transmit signals to or from the lens assembly to an external processor. Regarding claim 9, Lee and Xu, the combination, discloses everything claimed as applied above (see claim 8), in addition, Lee discloses, wherein the circuit board assembly (12, 100, 110; fig. 3) further comprises a base layer (100; fig. 3) and a conductive structure (20-22; fig. 2) in the base layer, the first connection pad is arranged on the base layer ([0035]; fig. 2), the first connection pad (12; fig. is connected to the conductive structure ([0036]; Signal transmitting lines 20-22 and pads 10-12 are integrally formed of the same conductive material.), the insulating layer is connected to the base layer ([0046]), the insulating layer covers the first connection pad (fig. 3), the insulating layer defines an opening (Opening is where the second section is located; fig. 3), and the first section is exposed from the opening (fig. 3). Regarding claim 10, Lee and Xu, the combination, discloses everything claimed as applied above (see claim 8), in addition, Xu discloses, wherein the lens assembly further comprises a lens component (100; fig. 2), a voice coil motor (11,50, 60, 61, 70, 71; figs. 1-3), an image stabilization unit (10, 12, 20, 30, 40; figs. 1-4) , and an image sensor (13; figs. 1, 2, 4), the lens component is connected to one side of the voice coil motor (figs. 1-3), the image stabilization unit is connected to another side of the voice coil motor (figs. 1-4), and the image sensor is disposed on the image stabilization unit (figs. 1, 2, 4). Lee teaches an assembly including connection pads which is connected to a circuit board assembly using the connection pads. Xu teaches a lens assembly including connection pads which is connected to an external element using the connection pads. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to substitute the undisclosed assembly of Lee with the lens assembly of Xu to achieve the predictable result of being able to transmit signals to or from the lens assembly to an external processor. Regarding claim 11, Lee and Xu, the combination, discloses everything claimed as applied above (see claim 10), in addition, Xu discloses, wherein the image stabilization unit (10, 12, 20, 30, 40; figs. 1-4) protrudes from an edge of the voice coil motor (11,50, 60, 61, 70, 71; figs. 1-3) to form a connection portion (fig. 3), the connection portion is electrically connected to the voice coil motor, and the second connection pad is arranged on the connection portion ([0028], Coils 11 are electrically connected to circuit board 10 which is electrically connected to flexible circuit board 20 where the connection pads are; fig. 3). Lee teaches an assembly including connection pads which is connected to a circuit board assembly using the connection pads. Xu teaches a lens assembly including connection pads which is connected to an external element using the connection pads. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to substitute the undisclosed assembly of Lee with the lens assembly of Xu to achieve the predictable result of being able to transmit signals to or from the lens assembly to an external processor. Regarding claim 14, Lee discloses An electronic device, comprising: a a circuit board assembly (100, 12, 110; fig. 3) comprises a first connection pad (12; fig. 3) and an insulating layer (100; fig. 3), the first connection pad comprising a first section (Section of 12 not covered by insulating layer 100; fig. 3) and a second section (Section of 12 covered by insulating layer 100; fig. 3), the insulating layer covering the second section (fig. 3); a[n] (200; fig. 3) comprising a second connection pad (230; fig. 3), the second connection pad corresponds to the first section (fig. 3), the second section is staggered from the second connection pad (fig. 3); an activated conductive film (300; fig. 3) positioned between the first connection pad and the second connection pad, the activated conductive film comprises a conductive pathway (solder cream; [0052]), wherein the conductive pathway electrically connects the first section and the second connection pad (solder cream; [0052]), and the insulating layer electrically isolates the second section from the second connection pad (fig. 3). However, Lee fails to explicitly disclose the assembly is a lens assembly. However, the examiner maintains that it was well known in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to provide this, as taught by Xu. An electronic device ([0013]), comprising: a casing (Inherent in an electronic device such as a computer, mobile phone, a tablet, etc. ; [0069]); and a camera module partially exposed from the casing (This is inherent as this is the only way the camera module could capture images without being obstructed by the casing; [0069]). Lee teaches an assembly including connection pads which is connected to a circuit board assembly using the connection pads. Xu teaches a lens assembly including connection pads which is connected to an external element using the connection pads. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to substitute the undisclosed assembly of Lee with the lens assembly of Xu to achieve the predictable result of being able to transmit signals to or from the lens assembly to an external processor. Regarding claim 15, it recites similar limitations to claim 9 and is therefore rejected for the same reasons as stated above (see claim 9). Regarding claim 16, it recites similar limitations to claim 10 and is therefore rejected for the same reasons as stated above (see claim 10). Regarding claim 17, it recites similar limitations to claim 11 and is therefore rejected for the same reasons as stated above (see claim 11). Regarding claim 20, Lee and Xu, the combination, discloses everything claimed as applied above (see claim 14), in addition, Xu discloses, wherein the electronic device is selected from a smartphone, tablet, or smartwatch with camera functionality ([0069]). Claim(s) 12, 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee in view of Xu further in view of Kani. Regarding claim 12, Lee and Xu, the combination, discloses everything claimed as applied above (see claim 10), however, the combination, fails to explicitly disclose the bonding matrix. However, the examiner maintains that it was well known in the art to provide this, as taught by Kani. In a similar field of endeavor, Kani discloses wherein the activated conductive film (Anisotropic film [0040]) further comprises a bonding matrix, the boding matrix defines a thickness direction, and the conductive pathway is disposed in the bonding matrix in the thickness direction (130, 150; fig. 4A; [0040]). Lee teaches using solder cream to conductively adhere two pads. Kani teaches using an anisotropic film including an adhesive matrix to conductively adhere two pads. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to substitute the solder cream with the anisotropic film of Kani to achieve the predictable result of conductively connecting two pads. Regarding claim 18, it recites similar limitations to claim 12 and is therefore rejected for the same reasons as stated above (see claim 12). Claim(s) 13, 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee in view of Xu further in view of Kani further in view of Official Notice. Regarding claim 13, Lee, Xu, and Kani, the combination, discloses everything claimed as applied above (see claim 12), in addition, Kani discloses, wherein the conductive pathway is made from [metal], and the bonding matrix is made from epoxy resins, polyimides, or phenolic resins ([0040]). However, the combination fails to explicitly disclose what type of metal the conductive particles are. However, the examiner takes official notice of the fact that it was well known in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to provide this. The combination teaches the plurality of conductive particles of the anisotropic film are metal. Gold, nickel, silver, and copper are all well-known conductive metals. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to substitute the undisclosed type of metal with one of gold, nickel, silver, or copper to achieve the predictable result of creating an electric connection. Regarding claim 19, it recites similar limitations to claim 13 and is therefore rejected for the same reasons as stated above (see claim 13). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Go et al. (US 2019/0067844 A1) discloses connecting two circuit boards using ACF (fig. 3). Hsu et al. (US 2008/0149947 A1) discloses connecting two circuit boards using ACF (figs. 7-8). Huang et al. (US 2009/0321110 A1) discloses connecting two circuit boards using ACF (fig. 1). Ahn et al. (KR 10-2018-0077835) discloses connecting two circuit boards using ACF (fig. 9). Osterwald et al. (US 2021/0013175 A1) discloses a heat press for bonding electrical components including a cushion (fig. 4). Yanagawa (US 2010/0021667 A1) discloses a heat press for bonding electrical components including a cushion (fig. 7). Saito (US 2014/0302643 A1) discloses a heat press for bonding electrical components including a cushion (fig. 4). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PAUL M BERARDESCA whose telephone number is (571)270-3579. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thurs 10-8, Fri 10-2. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sinh Tran can be reached at (571)272-7564. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. PAUL M. BERARDESCA Examiner Art Unit 2637 /PAUL M BERARDESCA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2637 4/27/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 26, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Jan 14, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12627904
SIMULTANEOUS SUBSAMPLING AND HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE IMAGING IN COLOUR FILTER ARRAYS
2y 3m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12610143
IMAGE STABILIZATION CONTROL APPARATUS AND METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 8m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12610122
OPTICAL SYSTEM
1y 10m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12604116
CLOCK TRANSMISSION CIRCUIT, IMAGING ELEMENT, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CLOCK TRANSMISSION CIRCUIT
1y 11m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12587736
ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPRISING CAMERA MODULE
1y 8m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+17.4%)
2y 5m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 816 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month