DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
(a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/102(a)(2) as being anticipated by US 9550658 B2 (Uhl et al.).
Regarding claim 1, Uhl et al. disclose:
A vehicle engagement assembly (arm 130, figure 3) attached to a vehicle lift (figure 2), wherein the vehicle lift is configured to actuate the engagement assembly (130) between a lowered position (figure 1) and a raised position (figure 2), the vehicle engagement assembly comprises:
(a) a first arm (first segment 132, figure 3) comprising a first notch (slot 142, figure 3) and having a distalmost edge (distal end 131, figure 3),
(b) a second arm (second segment 134, figure 3) configured to transition between a first extended configuration (figure 3) and a first fully retracted configuration (“second segment (134) may be retracted relative to first segment (132).” Col. 3, line 67 through col. 4, line 1, fully retracted is the position where edge 135 is nearest edge 131) relative to the first arm (134), wherein a distal end (135) of the second arm is located either flush with or proximal to the distalmost edge of the first arm in the first retracted configuration (slots 140, 142 are configured to overlap such that a shaft of an adapter accessory can be within both slots, see col. 6 lines 12-17, in such an overlapped position (i.e. the first retracted configuration) 135 is proximal to 131),
(c) an adapter coupling arm (adapter pilot 400, figure 17A) comprising a coupling portion (bore 428, figure 17A), wherein the adapter coupling arm (400) is configured to translate within the second arm (134) between a second extended configuration (when adapter pilot is at leftmost end of slot 140, figure 3) and a second fully retracted configuration (when adapter pilot is at rightmost end of slot 140, figure 3), and
(d) an adapter (adapter 500, figure 17A) configured to engage a vehicle (col. 5, lines 40-41, “accessory (500, 600) may be used to directly contact a vehicle”), wherein the adapter is configured to couple with the coupling portion (428), wherein the adapter (500) is configured to fit within the first notch (142) such that the adapter is proximal to the distalmost edge (131) when both the second arm (134) is in the first fully retracted configuration and the adapter coupling arm (400) is in the second fully retracted configuration (“the presence and configuration of slot (142) provides additional clearance for shaft (520, 620) of accessory (500, 600) in settings where second segment (134) is substantially retracted relative to first segment (132)(e.g., where a common vertical axis passes through both slots (140, 142)” col. 6, lines 12-17).
Regarding claim 2, Uhl et al. further disclose:
wherein the adapter (500) is configured to fit within a second notch (slot 140, figure 3) of the second arm (134) when the adapter coupling arm is in the second fully retracted configuration (at rightmost end of slot 140, figure 3).
Regarding claim 3, Uhl et al. further disclose:
wherein the adapter includes a vehicle contact surface (512), wherein the vehicle contact surface is configured to be positioned above the first notch (142) when the adapter is coupled with the coupling portion and when the vehicle engagement assembly is in the first and second fully retracted configuration.
Regarding claim 4, Uhl et al. further disclose:
wherein the adapter (500) is configured to nest within each of the first notch (142) and a second notch (slot 140, figure 3) of the second arm (134).
Regarding claim 5, Uhl et al. further disclose:
wherein the coupling portion is configured to limit rotation of the adapter (pin 426 through 428 limits rotation of the adapter).
Regarding claim 6, Uhl et al. further disclose:
wherein the adapter (500) includes a first cross-section (horizontal cross-section from upper part of shaft 520) sized to fit within the first notch (142) and a second cross-section (horizontal cross-section from lower part of shaft 520) sized to fit with a second notch (slot 140, figure 3) of the second arm (134).
Regarding claim 7, Uhl et al. further disclose:
wherein the adapter (500) is configured to be positioned at a first height when the adapter coupling arm (400) is in the second fully retracted configuration and at a second height when the adapter coupling arm (400) is in the second extended configuration, wherein the first height is higher than the second height (col. 4, lines 43-49, the height of the adapter assembly as shown in figure 17B is configured to be selectively increased/decreased regardless of extended or retracted position within arm 134, e.g. at a higher height in the retracted position and a lower height in the extended position).
Regarding claim 8, Uhl et al. further disclose:
wherein the adapter coupling arm (400) includes a groove (groove where 410 meets 420, figure 17B) having a groove end (the groove ends on either side of openings 422), wherein the second arm (134) includes an abutment (lower curved end of slot 140, figure 3) configured to traverse the groove and contact the groove end (col. 5, lines 47-50, “Upwardly extending outer sidewall (420) of adapter pilot (400) and slot (140) of first arm (130) are sized and configured such that accessory (500, 600) may be translated to various positions along the length of slot (140).” The edges of slot 140 keep 400 within the slot) to thereby prevent the adapter coupling arm (224) from extending beyond the second extended configuration (when cross linkage joint 246 contacts rightmost end of 251, 224 is extended and prevented from further extension).
Regarding claim 9, Uhl et al. further disclose:
wherein the adapter coupling arm (400) includes a taper extending toward the coupling portion (400 becomes progressively smaller in diameter from 410 to 420 to 424 where coupling portion 428 is centered).
Regarding claim 10, Uhl et al. further disclose:
wherein the adapter coupling arm (400) includes a lower cutout (between sidewalls 420, 424, figure 17A) such that a portion of the adapter coupling arm (400) is a U channel (between 420 and 424 is a U-channel facing upward).
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claims 11-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 9550658 B2 (Uhl et al.) in view of US 9701526 B2 (Benz).
Regarding claim 11, Uhl et al. teach:
The vehicle engagement assembly of claim 1.
Uhl et al. are silent to a support on a lower portion of the channel of the first arm.
However, Benz teaches:
A vehicle engagement assembly (support arm 21, figure 7) with a first arm (first support arm piece 58, figure 7) and second arm (second support arm piece 59, figure 7),
wherein the first arm (58) includes a support (roller guide 83, figure 7) and a channel (interior of arm piece 58) having a lower portion (lower plate of 58 shown in figure 7), wherein the second arm (59) is positioned within the channel, wherein the support is positioned on the lower portion and is configured to contact the second arm to thereby lift the second arm away from the lower portion (roller guide 83 is positioned on the lower portion of 59 and contacts 58 to lift 58 relative to 59).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to place a support, as taught by Benz, within the first arm of Uhl et al. with a reasonable expectation of success to make transitions between the extended and retracted configurations of the second arm easier by reducing friction between the arms. As noted by Benz, “These roller guides 83 acts in a supporting manner during retraction and extension of the support arm pieces 58, 59,” col. 8 lines 3-5.
Regarding claim 12, Benz further teaches:
wherein the first arm includes a stop (stop 84, “The extraction movement of the second support arm piece 49 is limited by the stop 84 depicted, for example, as a screw in the side wall 75 of the first support arm piece 58.” Col. 8, lines 27-30) wherein the stop is configured to contact the second arm when the second arm is in the first extended configuration (the stop operates by contact between the second arm 59 and stop 84).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate stops between the arm pieces configured for relative movement as taught by Benz with the arm pieces of Uhl et al. with a reasonable expectation of success to prevent movement beyond the fully retracted and fully extended positions. Claim 12 of Benz, “wherein a stop to limit extension paths or retraction paths of the support arm pieces is provided on each of a front and rear end or region of the support arm piece.” Lines 1-4.
Regarding claim 13, Benz further teaches:
the vehicle engagement assembly further comprising a stop contact (part of second arm 59 that comes into contact with stop 84 when fully extended) coupled with the second arm, wherein the stop contact is configured to contact the stop when in the first extended configuration to thereby prevent the second arm from extending beyond the first extended configuration.
While the stop contact portion of second arm 59 is not explicitly shown, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention that a part (i.e., stop contact) of second arm 59 must come into contact with the stop 84 that limits the extension movement of the second arm as a necessary part of the operation of the stop.
Regarding claim 14, Benz further teaches:
the first arm including an opening (at the distal end of arm piece 58) configured to allow the stop contact (of second arm 59) to pass through the opening and to attach to the second arm while the second arm is in a channel of the first arm (the second arm 59 attaches to first arm 58 when the second arm passes through the opening at the distal end of first arm 58 to nest within the channel formed inside first arm 58).
Regarding claim 15, Benz further teaches:
wherein the second arm includes upper, lower, and lateral sidewalls (upper, lower, and one lateral sidewall shown in figure 7, second sidewall not shown because figure 7 is a longitudinally cut cross-section), wherein the upper and lower sidewalls are thicker than the lateral sidewalls (the upper and lower sidewalls are shown to be thicker than the lateral sidewalls in figure 5 and 7).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have thicker upper and lower sidewalls in the second arm of Uhl et al., as taught by Benz, with a reasonable expectation of success to provide the necessary supportive structure while minimizing material cost and weight.
Claims 16-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 9550658 B2 (Uhl et al.) in view of EP 3851406 A1 (Futscher, Applicant’s cited prior art).
Regarding claim 16, Uhl et al. teach:
A vehicle engagement assembly (130) attached to a vehicle lift (figure 2), wherein the vehicle lift is configured to actuate the engagement assembly between a lowered position (figure 1) and a raised position (figure 2), the vehicle engagement assembly comprising:
(a) a first arm (132) defining a channel (interior of 132),
(c) a second arm (134),
(d) an adapter coupling arm (400) comprising a coupling portion (428), and configured to transition between a second extended configuration (leftmost end of slot 140) and a second retracted configuration (rightmost end of slot 140) relative to the second arm (134), and
(e) an adapter (500) configured to couple with the coupling portion (428) and to contact a vehicle (top of adapter 500 is configured to contact a vehicle to be lifted).
Uhl et al. do not teach:
the first arm defining a stop, the stop being positioned within the channel, and the first arm defining an opening located proximally to the stop, and
a stop contact, wherein the second arm is configured to transition between a first extended configuration and a first retracted configuration relative to the first arm, wherein the stop contact is configured to traverse through the opening while the second arm is positioned within the channel to thereby selectively couple with the second arm and, once coupled with the second arm, to contact the stop to thereby define the first extended configuration and to prevent the second arm from extending beyond the first extended configuration.
However, Futscher teaches:
A vehicle engagement assembly with a first arm (1) and second arm (2), and
the first arm defining a channel (interior of 1) and a stop (122), the stop being positioned within the channel, and the channel including an opening (opening as distalmost end of 1), and
a stop contact (212), wherein the second arm (2) is configured to transition between a first extended configuration (figure 6) and a first retracted configuration (when 181 and 182 are positioned one above the other, not shown) relative to the first arm, wherein the stop contact is configured to traverse through the opening (figure 4b) while the second arm is positioned within the channel (end 17 of second arm 2 is within the channel while 212 traverses through the opening) to thereby selectively couple with the second arm and, once coupled with the second arm, to contact the stop to thereby define the first extended configuration and to prevent the second arm from extending beyond the first extended configuration (212 contacts 122, figure 4d, defining the extended configuration of figure 6).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate stops between the arm pieces configured for relative movement as taught by Futscher with the arm pieces of Uhl et al. with a reasonable expectation of success to prevent movement beyond the fully retracted and fully extended positions.
Regarding claim 17, Uhl et al. further teach:
wherein the second arm (134) includes a notch (140), wherein the adapter (shaft 520 of 500) is configured to fit within the notch (140) when the adapter coupling arm (400) is in the second retracted configuration (rightmost end of slot 140).
Claim 18 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 9550658 B2 (Uhl et al.) in view of EP 3851406 A1 (Futscher, Applicant’s cited prior art) and further in view of US 9701526 B2 (Benz).
Regarding claim 18, Uhl et al. and Futscher teach:
The vehicle engagement assembly of claim 16.
Uhl et al. and Futscher do not teach a support to lift the second arm away from a lower surface.
However, Benz teaches:
wherein the first arm (58) further includes a support (roller guide 83, figure 7) wherein the second arm (59) is positioned within the channel (interior of arm piece 58), wherein the support is positioned on a lower surface and configured to contact the second arm to thereby lift the second arm away from the lower surface (roller guide 83 is positioned on the lower portion of 59 and contacts 58 to lift 58 relative to 59), wherein the support (83) and the stop (84) are separated by a distance (the stop 84 and roller guide 83 are not in the same position and are therefore separated by a distance).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to place a support, as taught by Benz, within the first arm of Uhl et al. and Futscher with a reasonable expectation of success to make transitions between the extended and retracted configurations of the second arm easier by reducing friction between the arms. As noted by Benz, “These roller guides 83 acts in a supporting manner during retraction and extension of the support arm pieces 58, 59,” col. 8 lines 3-5.
Allowable Subject Matter
Claim 19 is allowed.
Response to Arguments
Applicant's arguments filed July 16, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. On page 6 of the Remarks Applicant argues that Uhl et al. do not teach every limitation recited in claim 1. On page 6, paragraph 4, Applicant argues that Uhl et al. do not teach the limitation, “the adapter is configured to fit within the first notch such that the adapter is proximal to the distalmost edge when both the second arm is in the first fully retracted configurations and the adapter coupling arm is in the second fully retracted configuration.” The Examiner respectfully disagrees with this assessment of the first and second fully retracted configurations of Uhl et al.. On page 7, Applicant cites Uhl et al. col. 3 through col. 4 discussing a version of the invention where it is possible for the second segment 134 to be retracted such that a proximal end of 134 protrudes proximally from the proximal end of first segment 132 and concludes that such a configuration would not result in the claimed arrangement. This is not a limiting embodiment of the lift arm. Uhl et al. begins the cited section stating this configuration is possible “In some versions” col. 3, line 67, the second segment is capable of being arranged to retract as described, it is not always arranged in that way.
Applicant further claims on page 7 that even if 134 is retractable within 132 up to a position where the proximal-most portions of slots 140, 142 align the distal end of 134 would be extending distally from the distalmost edge of 132. This argument is not commensurate with the scope of the claim. In such a case the configuration meets the limitations of claim 1. Applicant’s claim 1 recites the limitation in lines 5-8 , “a second arm configured to transition between a first extended configuration and a first fully retracted configuration relative to the first arm, wherein a distal end of the second arm is located either flush with or proximal to the distalmost edge of the first arm in the first fully retracted configuration.” The Examiner contends that in the first fully retracted configuration the distal end of the second arm 134 is proximal to, not flush with, the distalmost edge of 132.
Slots 140 and 142 are designed to be aligned at their proximal ends, not their distal ends. This is evidenced by the common shapes of the distal ends of the slots (figures 3), and col. 5, lines 28-30, “First segment (132) also includes a slot (142), which is substantially aligned with slot (140).” When 134 is fully retracted into 132 slot 142 is intended to align with slot 140. The Examiner is in agreement that in this fully retracted configuration the distal ends of 132 and 134 are not likely flush with each other based on the lengths shown in the figures. This point is moot, however, based on the limitation allowing the distal ends to be proximal to each other rather than flush with each other.
On pages 8-9 Applicant discusses the references cited in the 103 rejections. Page 10, first paragraph, in regard to claim 16 Applicant argues that teaching reference Futscher does not teach “any alleged stop contact traversing through the opening to thereby selectively couple to the second arm.” The language of claim 16 is not clear about the intended coupling. The Examiner interpreted the limitation as a resulting coupling of the first arm with the second arm once the stop contact traverses through the opening. If the limitation is intended to point to the selective coupling of the stop contact with the second arm, and not coupling of the first arm with the second arm because of the stop contact, the Examiner recommends altering the limitation to read, “to thereby selectively couple the stop contact with the second arm” for clarity. Applicant further argues that the Office has not articulated a rationale as to why a person having ordinary skill in the art would have modified the teachings of the combined art of record to include the above-noted features. The motivation for including stops as taught by Futscher was included in the Non-Final rejection of March 16, 2026 and has been repeated in the current rejection.
Conclusion
THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHELLE M MUDWILDER whose telephone number is (571)272-6068. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 11:00 am - 7:30 pm.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ROBERT HODGE can be reached at (571)272-2097. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/M.M.M./Examiner, Art Unit 3654
/ROBERT W HODGE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3654
