Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/648,355

Multi Compartment Family Travel Bag

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Apr 27, 2024
Examiner
MAI, TRI M
Art Unit
3733
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
2 (Final)
36%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
57%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 36% of cases
36%
Career Allow Rate
521 granted / 1440 resolved
-33.8% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
1489
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
65.1%
+25.1% vs TC avg
§102
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
§112
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1440 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1, 7, 9-12, and 17-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kuta (WO2009004602) in view of Yu (20190142123) or Myerscough (11033081), and further in view of Michel (FR2622088). PNG media_image1.png 1026 766 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 553 604 media_image2.png Greyscale The main zip fastener 4 comprises a first half portion 67 which is secured to the first bag element 2 around the periphery of the base 10 thereof, and a second half portion 68 which is secured to the side and end walls 48 and 49 of the second bag element 3 around the periphery of the second open mouth 51. The first bag element 2 comprises a base 10 of a flexible waterproof textile type material which is retained substantially rigidly in the form of a rectangle by a rectangular frame (not shown). In this embodiment of the invention the second bag element 3 is retained substantially rigid by a framework 52 which may be of any suitable material, but typically would be of a relatively lightweight material, such as, for example, a lightweight plastics or aluminium material. Kuta teaches a carrying bag assembly comprising: a top bag portion and a bottom bag portion removably attached to the top bag portion (fig. 26), the bottom bag portion and top portion operable as individual carrying bags when separated, a zipper assembly around a part of a perimeter of the top bag portion (at 67) and the bottom bag portion (at 68), allowing for opening the top bag portion relative to the bottom bag portion via a hinge on one side of the soft-sided carrying bag assembly wherein the hinge comprises a second zipper assembly (which is part of the zipper), the second zipper assembly allowing the top bag portion and bottom bag portion to be removably attached, a portion of the perimeter inherently forming a hinge zipper portion, wherein the zipper assembly allows connection about an entire perimeter of the top bag portion and bottom bag portion in a closed position, a fully open position with the slider of the zipper assembly moved to the hinge zipper portion, and a disconnected position with the zipper assembly first zipper side and second zipper sides separated as cited above. Kuta also teaches the bottom bag portion has an interior portion accessible by a closure; the bottom bag portion further comprising wheels and a telescoping handle (86) on an opposite side of the bottom bag portion from the wheels, and the bottom bag having no shoulder straps. Kuta also teaches the bottom bag has an interior portion, wheels (fig. 23) and a telescoping handle (114) on an opposite side of the bottom bag portion from the wheels. Kuta also teaches top bag portion comprises three compartments dividing an internal volume, two compartments formed by dividers extending perpendicularly to a major axis of the top bag portion and accessible by one compartment zipper at 33/94 which extends perpendicularly to the major axis of the top bag portion. Kuta also teaches straps at 41 (which can be used as shoulder straps) on the top bag portion and on a same side of the top bag portion as each compartment zipper (note the zippers at 33/91 extending on the three sides of the top portion and the strap at 41 are on the two sides as the zippers 33/94). Kuta does not teach a) the zipper assembly has a double row on one lengthwise side of the top such that the zipper assembly has a double row portion on one lengthwise side of the top bag portion and one lengthwise side of the bottom bag portion to create a hinge, b)the bottom bag has a closure, and c) top bag portion comprises three compartments dividing into three compartments formed an approximately equal volume formed by the dividers being spaced equidistantly apart. PNG media_image3.png 520 550 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 424 599 media_image4.png Greyscale [0019] In one embodiment of the present invention, the fastener 103 may be a zipper. For example, the zipper includes a third row of zipper teeth formed on the first compartment, a fourth row of zipper teeth formed on the second compartment, a first slider coupled to the third row of zipper, and a second slider coupled to the fourth row of zipper. In one aspect of the present invention, a first end portion of the third row of zipper and a second end portion of the third row of zipper overlap such that double rows are formed on the first compartment for a section that is less than 20 cm and greater than 10 cm. PNG media_image5.png 398 587 media_image5.png Greyscale PNG media_image6.png 480 804 media_image6.png Greyscale Yu teaches two peripheral zippers that formed a double row between 10 and 20cm at the hinged area in fig. 1B. Myerscough also teaches that it is known in the art to provide attachment of two zipper forming a double row in figs. 2 and 3. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to provide overlapped zipper end portions forming double row as taught by either Yu or Myerscough to provide added strength and/or against leakage. PNG media_image7.png 501 732 media_image7.png Greyscale Yu teaches that it is known in the art to provide two separable bags each has a closure (note top of 152 has a closure). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to provide the bottom bag with a closure to enanble one to use the bottom bag as a separate bag when needed. PNG media_image8.png 503 548 media_image8.png Greyscale PNG media_image9.png 866 676 media_image9.png Greyscale Michel teaches that it is known in the art to provide an internal bag with compartment each of the plurality of compartments has an approximately equal volume formed by the dividers being spaced equidistantly apart and each having its own zipper. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to provide the three compartments with zipperz extending perpendicular to the axis as taught by Michel to enable one to store the desired contents and/or the desired size for each compartment. Regarding claim 8, note the foot element at 37 comprises the foot element for supporting the device in the standing position as claimed. PNG media_image10.png 550 753 media_image10.png Greyscale Regarding claim 9, note the closure is a zipper in fig. 2B in Yu. Regarding claim 10, note portion of the top bag portion is soft-sided as claimed. Regarding claim 11, note portion of the bottom bag portion hard-sided cited above. Regarding claim 12, note the top bag portion comprises pocket on an outer face facing the bottom bag portion at 43/20/44/96. Note that “facing bottom” is broad and the flap on the pocket at 43 can be bent to face the bottom portion. Regarding claim 17, note the bag in Kuti comprises a crescent shape as claimed. In the alternative, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to provide the bag with compartment of crescent shape to provide the desired shape for the carrying the bag easily. Regarding claim 18, note at least a portion of the shoulder strap extending above the crescent shaped zippers. Claims 5, 6, and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kuti rejections, as set forth in paragraph 2, in view of Williams (20210145137) or Perez (D645662). PNG media_image11.png 674 385 media_image11.png Greyscale Kuti meets all claimed limitations except for the shoulder straps are removable and stowable. Williams teaches that it is known in the art to provide shoulder straps are removable (via removable clip). Perez also teaches that it is known in the art to provide removable shoulder strap on the top of bag in fig. 3 and removable in fig. 4 (claim 18). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the shoulder straps on a same side as the of the top bag portion as each compartment zipper and being removable and stowable as taught by Williams or Perez to enable to put the shoulder strap away when not needed. Regarding claim 18, note that in Williams the shoulder straps can be flexible and be extended above the zippers. Claim 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kuti rejection, as set forth in paragraph 2, in view of Herrera (2675042) or Sheikh (CA2635328). Herrea or Sheikh teaches that it is known in the art to provide pocket on a divider. PNG media_image12.png 753 477 media_image12.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide pocket on a divider to store additional contents. Applicant’s arguments with respect to the claims have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejections. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TRI M MAI whose telephone number is (571)272-4541. The examiner can normally be reached 8am-5pm (Mon-Friday). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Jenness can be reached at (571) 270-5055. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. TRI M. MAI Examiner Art Unit 3733 /TRI M MAI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3733
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 27, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 03, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Dec 03, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 05, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 05, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 17, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 06, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12582579
PREMATURE INFANT PACIFIER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12569042
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MOBILE OFFICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564250
SPLIT HANDLE, NARROW ROLLING BAG
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12550986
Fashion Carry Bag Assembly with Detachable Purse
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12544315
INFANT FEEDER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
36%
Grant Probability
57%
With Interview (+20.9%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1440 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month