Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/648,471

CONNECTOR DEVICE AND RECEPTACLE CONNECTOR THEREOF

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 28, 2024
Priority
Nov 07, 2023 — CN 202311476223.0
Examiner
LE, THANH TAM T
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Delta Electronics Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
1233 granted / 1427 resolved
+26.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1458
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
52.9%
+12.9% vs TC avg
§102
34.1%
-5.9% vs TC avg
§112
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1427 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-5 and 8-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Deng et al. (11,728,602) in view of Aldehayyat et al. (9,728,915). Regarding claims 1 and 8, Deng et al. disclose a connector device, comprising: a receptacle connector (2, Fig. 1), comprising a receptacle insulative seat (FIGURE A below), a shell (FIGURE A below) and a plurality of receptacle terminals (23, Fig. 1), the receptacle insulative seat comprising a tongue (22, Fig. 7), the tongue comprising two side surfaces disposed opposite to each other and an end surface connected between the side surfaces, the receptacle insulative seat sheathed by the shell, the shell disposed to surround the tongue and spaced from the tongue, the shell comprising an opening (21) and the end surface of the tongue located in the opening (Fig. 1), the shell comprising a magnetic attracting portion (24, Fig. 7) disposed in the opening, the receptacle terminals disposed on the tongue, exposed from the side surfaces; and a plug connector (1, Fig. 1), comprising a plug insulative seat (14, Fig. 2), a magnetic attracting component (18) and a plurality of plug terminals (12), the plug insulative seat comprising a coupling surface (Fig. 7), the magnetic attracting component disposed on the plug insulative seat, at least a part of the plug terminals disposed on the coupling surface corresponding to a part of the receptacle terminals, wherein the opening is defined with a coupling direction (Fig. 7), when the plug connector is coupled with the receptacle connector, the plug insulative seat is loosely coupled to the opening along the coupling direction, the magnetic attracting component and the magnetic attracting portion are attracted with each other, the coupling surface is spaced from the end surface, and the plug terminals abut against the end surface and abut against the receptacle terminals correspondingly. Deng et al. disclose the claimed invention as described above except for the receptacle terminals extended to the end surface. Aldehayyat et al., Fig. 3 shows receptacle terminals (350) extended to the end surface (310). It would have been obvious to modify Deng et al. to have the receptacle terminals extended to the end surface, as taught by Aldehayyat et al. for better connection. PNG media_image1.png 216 295 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Deng et al., Fig. 7 shows the magnetic attracting portion and the magnetic attracting component are opposite in magnetic pole. Regarding claims 3 and 10, it is noted that Aldehayyat et al., Fig. 3 shows each of the receptacle terminals comprises a first coupling segment (322 and 326) and a second coupling segment (350), the first coupling segment is exposed from one of the side surfaces of the tongue, and the second coupling segment is exposed from the end surface of the tongue. Regarding claims 4 and 11, it is noted that Aldehayyat et al., Fig. 3 shows the end surface is non-parallel to each of the side surfaces. Regarding claim 5, it is noted that Aldehayyat et al., Fig. 3 shows the end surface (310) is a convex curved surface. Regarding claim 9, Deng et al., Fig. 7 shows the magnetic attracting portion is magnetic. Regarding claim 12, it is noted that Aldehayyat et al., Fig. 3 shows the second coupling segment is non-parallel to the first coupling segment. Claims 6 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Deng et al. and Aldehayyat et al. as applied to claims 1 and 8 above, and further in view of Jung et al. (11,211,746). Regarding claims 6 and 13, Deng et al., Fig. 1 show the opening is defined with a coupling direction, the tongue comprises a pair of lateral peripheries, each of the lateral peripheries is connected between the side surfaces, the pair of lateral peripheries are disposed at two sides of the end surface opposite to each other. Deng et al. and Aldehayyat et al. disclose the claimed invention as described above except for a hook is arranged on each of the lateral peripheries, and each hook is defined with a stopping direction opposite to the coupling direction. Jung et al., Fig. 1B shows a hook (120031) is arranged on each of the lateral peripheries, and each hook is defined with a stopping direction opposite to the coupling direction. It would have been obvious to modify Deng et al. to have a hook is arranged on each of the lateral peripheries, and each hook is defined with a stopping direction opposite to the coupling direction, as taught by Jung et al. for better connection. Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Deng et al. and Aldehayyat et al. as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Blake et al. (10,658,793). Regarding claim 7, Deng et al. and Aldehayyat et al. disclose the claimed invention as described except for a plurality of notches is defined on the coupling surface of the plug insulative seat, an elastic conductor is arranged in each of the notches, the plug terminals are inserted in the notches correspondingly and arranged to abut against a plurality of elastic conductors correspondingly. Blake et al., Fig. 4 shows terminals (118 or 128) are pogo pins (column 4, lines 27-28 and column 5, lines 18-19) are located in a plurality of notches is defined on the coupling surface of the plug insulative seat, an elastic conductor is arranged in each of the notches, the plug terminals are inserted in the notches correspondingly and arranged to abut against a plurality of elastic conductors correspondingly. It would have been obvious to modify Deng et al. to have the pogo pins that located in the plurality of notches, as taught by Blake et al. for better connection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THANH TAM T LE whose telephone number is (571)272-2094. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abdul Riyami can be reached at 571-270-3119. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THANH TAM T LE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831 06/30/26 thanh-tam.le@uspto.gov
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 28, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12665367
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING ELECTRONIC COMPONENT AND ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665350
Electromagnetic Electrical Connector System
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658641
Lever and Header Gear Tooth Engagement to Prevent Premature Connector Mating
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12658643
FIRST CONNECTOR AND CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY WITH UNLOCKING SLIDER
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651864
Magnetically Coupled Circuits
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.8%)
1y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1427 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month