Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/648,605

Charging Post Controller with Functional Modules Connected by Means of PCB, and Charging Post Thereof

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 29, 2024
Examiner
DIAO, M BAYE
Art Unit
2859
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sichuan Injet New Energy Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
1247 granted / 1424 resolved
+19.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
1464
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§103
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§102
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
§112
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1424 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Acknowledgement is made of application #18/648,605 filed on 04/29/2024 in which claims 1-14 have been presented for prosecution in a first action on the merits. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. 17/419,194, filed on 06/28/2021. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) filed on 04/29/2024 has been considered and placed of record. An initialed copy is attached herewith. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the limitations of, “current detection unit (52)” as recited in claim 8 must be shown , specifically in Fig. 3 or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. The drawings are further objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(4) because reference character “46” has been used to designate both “an external energy metering module (46)” and “an internal energy metering module (46)”, as recited in claim 4. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 3-4,6 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. While the limitations of, “…comprises A, B and/or C” unequivocally indicates that the subject matter includes at least one of the listed elements, allowing for any individual item or any combination of the items, it can nonetheless be argued that using “and/or” for more than two items can be ambiguous, as is the case in claims 3,6 and 8 and thus render the said claims consequently indefinite. Claim 4 depend directly from claim 3 and thus inherit the same deficiencies as parent claim 3. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-2,5,7,9-14 are objected to but are otherwise allowable. The prior art of record either taken alone or in combination thereof fails to teach or reasonably suggest, a charging post controller with various functional modules connected by means of a PCB, comprising a monitoring unit, a direct-current main loop unit and a mounting and fixing unit which are associated with each other, the monitoring unit comprising functional modules formed by combining a PCB and an electronic circuit, the functional modules being electrically connected by the PCB, and some or all of the functional modules being mounted on the mounting and fixing unit, such that a laminated arrangement structure is formed between the monitoring unit, the direct-current main loop unit and the mounting and fixing unit, wherein the direct-current main loop unit comprises unit modules, each of the unit modules being mounted on a face or two faces of the monitoring unit, and the mounting and fixing unit comprises an element unit, a bracket and/or a protective shell. Claims 3-4,6 and 8 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Citation of Prior art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. CN 206283291 U to Fan et al., (Fan) discloses the general state of the art regarding a new electric automobile direct current charging pile control system. USPAT 9,917,529 B2 to Hattori et al., (Hattori) discloses a power conversion unit, power converter and method of manufacturing power converter. USPAT 6,100,670 to Levesque discloses the general state of the art regarding multi-functional battery management module operable in a charging mode and a battery pack mode. USPAT 7,135,836 B2 to Kutkut et al., (Kutkut) discloses a modular and reconfigurable rapid battery charger. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to M'BAYE DIAO whose telephone number is (571)272-6127. The examiner can normally be reached M-F; 10:00AM-6:30PM and OFF most of the time Friday when working IFP. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, TAELOR KIM can be reached at 571-270-7166. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. M'BAYE DIAO Primary Examiner Art Unit 2859 /M BAYE DIAO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2859 February 20, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 29, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600265
POWER SUPPLY DEVICE, ELECTRIC VEHICLE PROVIDED WITH POWER SUPPLY DEVICE, AND POWER STORAGE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601790
Battery Parameter Estimation Apparatus and Method
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600258
MANAGEMENT OF CHARGING REQUESTS TO AVOID SECURITY ISSUES AND SERVICING DELAYS ACROSS CHARGING STATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594854
BATTERY CONTROL SYSTEM, BATTERY CONTROL METHOD AND ELECTRIC VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589665
PEER-TO-PEER DC FAST CHARGING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+3.4%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1424 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month