Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/648,729

Device and methodology for early detection of fluid loss and notification and system shutdown for a closed loop fluid heat transfer system

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 29, 2024
Examiner
BARGERO, JOHN E
Art Unit
3762
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Hydronics LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 10m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allow Rate
322 granted / 579 resolved
-14.4% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+30.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
615
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
59.2%
+19.2% vs TC avg
§102
21.9%
-18.1% vs TC avg
§112
16.1%
-23.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 579 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Allowable Subject Matter Claims 12-16 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The closest prior art of record, Kwak (US 2007/0205293), Trescott et al. (US 2014/0306828), Fuller (US 2008/0035647), Schindler et al. (US 2018/0245801), and Acker (US 10,208,967), alone or in combination, does not disclose the method of evaluating fluid pressure in a closed loop heat transfer system with the claimed steps that include using a controller with a fluid mass model connected to a data network and the conduit loops, wherein the controller samples the fluid temperatures, the system pressures through local sensors while receiving one or more outside air temperatures through a data network and then calculating a calculated fluid pressure value which is compared to sensor measured values to determine if a deviation exists and if so providing a notification of the deviation. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4 and 6-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kwak (US 2007/0205293), Trescott et al. (US 2014/0306828), Fuller (US 2008/0035647), and Schindler et al. (US 2018/0245801). Regarding claim 1, Kwak (K) discloses a method of detecting a leak in a closed loop heat transfer system, the method comprising: a. providing the closed loop heat transfer system (20-19, Figure 2), the heat transfer system including, an appliance for heating or cooling ([0039]), a circulator pump (16), an expansion tank (13), an air separator (10) with an air vent ([0049]), one or more heat transfer radiators ([0028]), a controller (26), a first conduit (19-20) fluidly connecting the appliance (@25), the circulator pump (16), the air separator (10) and the heat transfer radiators (@20) to form a circulation loop, a second conduit (Between 13 and 10, Figure 2) separate from the circulation loop for fluidly connecting the expansion tank to the air separator, one or more fluid temperature sensors located on the first conduit for measuring one or more fluid temperatures, the one or more fluid temperature sensors being in operative communication with the controller (7, [0044] above 19, 20). Kwak does not disclose one or more ambient temperature sensors located outside the conditioned space and configured to measure one or more ambient temperatures of the outside air, the one or more environmental temperature sensors being in operative communication with the controller, at least one fluid pressure transducer located on the second conduit for measuring one or more system pressures, the at least one fluid pressure transducer being in operative communication with the controller, and a fluid contained within the first and second conduits for circulating therein or that the controller has a processor and memory accessible by the processor, the memory including a fluid mass model stored thereon, b. the controller sampling one or more of the fluid temperatures, one or more of the ambient temperatures, and one or more of the system pressures through the one or more fluid temperature sensors, the one or more ambient temperature sensors, and the at least one fluid pressure transducer respectively; c. the controller calculating a calculated fluid pressure value using the fluid mass model based on the one or more fluid temperatures and the one or more ambient temperatures; d. the controller comparing the calculated fluid pressure with the one or more system fluid pressures to determine a deviation exists between the one or more fluid pressures and the calculated fluid pressure; and e. the controller providing a notification of the deviation. However, Trescott (T) discloses a leak detector (Abstract) HHwherein the closed loop heat transfer system further includes one or more ambient temperature sensors (704) located outside the conditioned space and configured to measure one or more ambient temperatures of the outside air, the one or more environmental temperature sensors being in operative communication with the controller ([0064]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of this application to utilize external temperature in determining the leak status of the system because extreme external temperatures would affect the pressure and temperature reading when water is added to the system due to the large temperature gradient. Further, Fuller (F) discloses an expansion tank system (Abstract) with a first loop (47-49-47, Figure 3) and a second conduit (51-54-40) with a pressure gauge (36, the equivalent to a pressure transducer). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of this application to monitor the pressure and temperature at the system at different locations to provide better diagnostics by having a plurality of inputs. Additionally, Schindler (S) discloses a controller (71, i.e. computer) has a processor and memory accessible by the processor, the memory including a fluid mass model stored thereon ([0044]), the controller sampling one or more of the fluid temperatures, one or more of the ambient temperatures, and one or more of the system pressures through the one or more fluid temperature sensors, the one or more ambient temperature sensors, and the at least one fluid pressure transducer respectively ([0034,0036,0046]), the controller calculating a calculated fluid pressure value using the fluid mass model based on the one or more fluid temperatures and the one or more ambient temperatures; d. the controller comparing the calculated fluid pressure with the one or more system fluid pressures to determine a deviation exists between the one or more fluid pressures and the calculated fluid pressure; and e. the controller providing a notification of the deviation ([0038]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of this application to sample temperatures and pressures among the system over time to determine leakage based on fluid mass modeling because by Boyle’s law pressure and temperature are related in a closed system, producing a more accurate monitoring model. Regarding claim 2, Kwak (K), as modified, discloses the method of claim 1 further comprising the controller modeling the closed loop heat transfer system based on the one or more fluid temperatures, the one or more ambient temperatures ([0053-0054]) and the one or more system pressures ([0048]) and storing data generated therefrom in the fluid mass model ([0040-0044]). Regarding claim 3, Kwak (K), as modified, discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the notification comprises at least one of a visual alarm, an audible alarm, an automated telephone call, and a text message ([0043]). Regarding claim 4, Kwak (K), as modified, discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the notification comprises transmitting an electronic message over a data network to predetermined recipients (61,Figure 2, [0038]). Regarding claim 6, Kwak (K), as modified, discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the heat transfer system further comprises one or more material surface temperature sensors located on or within the conditioned space (T-520, [0051], i.e., on the pipe surface), and wherein the controller samples one or more material surface temperatures from the one or more material surface temperature sensors, and uses the one or more material surface temperatures in said calculating a calculated fluid pressure value. Regarding claim 7, Kwak (K), as modified, discloses the method of claim 1 further comprising the controller receiving one or more external temperatures (T- [0016]) through a data network connection from an external source, and wherein the controller uses the one or more external temperature values in said calculating a calculated fluid pressure value (T-[0045]). Regarding claim 8, Kwak (K), as modified, discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the controller (T-102,Figure 1) is remotely located relative to a remainder of the closed loop heat transfer system. Regarding claim 9, Kwak (K), as modified, discloses the method of claim 8, wherein the controller is a part of a server computer ([0022], i.e., IOT). Regarding claim 10, Kwak (K), as modified, discloses the method of claim 8, wherein a fluid mass model comprises coefficients generated by prior collective heat transfer system history ([0031]). Regarding claim 11, Kwak (K), as modified, discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the heat transfer system further comprises one or more inside air temperature sensors (K-[0057]) located within the conditioned space and remote from a remainder of the heat transfer system, and wherein the controller samples one or more inside air temperatures from the one or more inside temperature sensors, and uses the one or more inside air temperatures in said calculating a calculated fluid pressure value. As a clarification, sensing the air temperature would be indicative of the performance of the system and the additional data points would improve accuracy. Claim 5, is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kwak (US 2007/0205293), Trescott et al. (US 2014/0306828), Fuller (US 2008/0035647), Schindler et al. (US 2018/0245801), and Acker (US 10,208,967). Regarding claim 5, Kwak (K), as modified, discloses the method of claim 1, but not that the circulation loop further includes a plurality of zone loops, and a fluid temperature sensor of the one or more fluid temperature sensors is located on each zone loop of the plurality of zone loops. However, Acker (A) discloses plumbing monitoring system (Abstract) wherein the circulation loop further includes a plurality of zone loops, and a fluid temperature sensor of the one or more fluid temperature sensors is located on each zone loop of the plurality of zone loops (C15, L1-25, Figure 3A). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of this application to monitor a plurality of zones, so that portions could be isolated in the event of a leak, leaving the remainder of the heating system functioning. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHN E BARGERO whose telephone number is (571) 270-1770. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steve McAllister can be reached at (571) 272-6785. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN E BARGERO/Examiner, Art Unit 3762 /STEVEN B MCALLISTER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3762
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 29, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595915
GAS VALVE AND OVEN
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594817
FLUID-HEATING DEVICE, IN PARTICULAR FOR A VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590710
LINKED HOT WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584691
FURNACE SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584656
WATER HEATER ASSEMBLY FOR A RECREATION VEHICLE AND METHOD FOR OPERATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+30.8%)
3y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 579 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month