Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 30, 2026
Application No. 18/649,477

METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING BIPOLAR ELECTRODE LAMINATE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING BIPOLAR BATTERY

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 29, 2024
Priority
Jun 07, 2023 — JP 2023-094115
Examiner
WALLS-MURRAY, JESSIE LOGAN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
113 granted / 152 resolved
+14.3% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+25.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
180
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
54.3%
+14.3% vs TC avg
§102
22.2%
-17.8% vs TC avg
§112
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 152 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 04/29/2024 and 08/28/2025 were in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 1-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tanaka et al. (US 2021/0028436 A1) in view of Honda (US 2017/0309966 A1). Regarding claim 1, Tanaka teaches a method for manufacturing (production method, [0030]) a bipolar electrode laminate (bipolar electrode, [0024]) having a first electrode active material layer, a current collector layer, and a second electrode active material layer in this order (bipolar electrodes 23 in which a positive electrode active material layer 13 electrically bonded to one surface of a current collector 11 is formed and a negative electrode active material layer 15 bonded to the other surface of the current collector 11 is formed; [0024]), the method comprising the following steps: providing a first electrode mixture comprising a first electrode active material, (electrode active material slurry including an electrode active material, a lithium salt, and a non-aqueous solvent … for forming a negative electrode active material layer intended for forming a negative electrode active material layer; [0041]), and a first binder (content of the binder is preferably 1% by mass or less, [0049]), and a second electrode mixture comprising a second electrode active material, (electrode active material slurry including an electrode active material, a lithium salt, and a non-aqueous solvent … for forming a positive electrode active material layer; [0041]), a second binder (content of the binder is preferably 1% by mass or less, [0049]) and an electrolyte component (electrode active material slurry including a lithium salt, [0041]), forming the first electrode mixture on a first surface of a current collector layer (a metal or a resin having electrical conductivity can be employed as the current collector, [0079]) to form a first electrode active material layer precursor (step of applying an electrode active material slurry on the surface of a current collector and thereby forming a coating film, [0030]), and forming the second electrode mixture on a second surface of the current collector layer to form a second electrode active material layer precursor (current collector has one face that is in contact with the positive electrode active material layer to the other face that is in contact with the negative electrode active material layer, [0079]; see also active material layers 13 and 15 on two faces of 11), pressing … the first electrode active material layer precursor (pressing performed in positive electrode production, [0173]), … and the second electrode active material layer precursor (pressing performed in negative electrode production, [0176]), and dissolving the electrolyte component in the second electrode active material layer with a solvent (a lithium salt and a non-aqueous solvent are mixed with an electrode active material, [0041, 0068]; LiPF6 as preferred lithium salt, [0071]; LiPF6 dissolved by mixed solvent, [0162]) to produce an electrolytic solution (thereby an electrolyte solution was obtained, [0162]). Tanaka fails to explicitly teach: pressing “a laminate comprising the first electrode active material layer precursor, the current collector layer, and the second electrode active material layer precursor”; the production of the above-cited electrolytic solution “after pressing”. Tanaka at [0030] does generally teach pressing the assembly which includes the applied electrode active material slurries. Tanaka also teaches at [0038] toward an embodiment of drying the electrode active material before mixing with lithium salt and solvent. Honda is analogous in the art of bipolar batteries ([0002]) and teaches manufacturing includes a pressing unit pressing a laminate of power generating elements ([0218]), and that such pressure compression makes each layer dense and gives a well bonded state ([0251]). Honda also teaches it is a known technique to perform said pressing on a dry electrode active mixture in order to increase the density of the electrode active material layer ([0229, 0233]). Therefore, a person having ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to press the laminate comprising the first electrode active material layer precursor, the current collector layer, and the second electrode active material layer precursor of Tanaka while in a dry state (i.e., before addition of liquid solvent to dissolve the lithium salt electrolyte component) in order to beneficially increase the density of the electrode active material layers in the laminate as well as ensure a well-bonded state of the electrode active material layers against the current collector therebetween, as taught toward by Honda. Furthermore, Tanaka welcomes [0042] that the order of adding members is also not particularly limited. Thereby, claim 1 is rendered obvious. Regarding claim 2, modified Tanaka teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein the electrolyte component is a lithium salt (Tanaka [0011, 0030, 0041, 0068, 0071]). Regarding claim 3, modified Tanaka teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein the first electrode active material layer is a positive electrode active material layer (one face that is in contact with the positive electrode active material layer, Tanaka [0079]), and the second electrode active material layer is a negative electrode active material layer (the other face that is in contact with the negative electrode active material layer, Tanaka [0079]) (a positive electrode active material layer 13 electrically bonded to one surface of a current collector 11 is formed and a negative electrode active material layer 15 bonded to the other surface of the current collector 11 is formed, Tanaka [0024 and Fig. 1). Regarding claim 4, modified Tanaka teaches a method for manufacturing a bipolar battery (a method for producing a non-aqueous electrolyte secondary battery, Tanaka [0030]), comprising manufacturing the bipolar electrode laminate by the method according to claim 1 (bipolar laminates 23 shown in overall battery 10 in Tanaka Fig. 1; see also citations in rejection of claim 1 above). Relevant Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Han et al. (“Using Mixed Salt Electrolytes to Stabilize Silicon Anodes for Lithium Ion Batteries via in Situ Formation of Li−M−Si Ternaries (M = Mg, Zn, Al, Ca)”, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 29780−29790, DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b07270) teaches toward the above-cited limitations of the electrode mixtures containing binders, as well as specifically the second (negative) electrode mixture containing the electrolyte component (salt): One of the main ways identified by researchers to stabilize Si anodes has been to use more compatible and flexible anode binders (Han pg. 29780, bottom of col. 2). Replacing traditional graphite anode by Si anode can greatly improve the energy density of lithium-ion batteries (Han abstract); a novel approach to modify the silicon electrode surface composition is reported based on adding M(TFSI)x (M = Mg, Zn, Al, and Ca) as a second salt (to LiPF6 per Han abstract) into the electrolyte formulation in low concentrations to promote an in situ formation of amorphous Li−M−Si ternary phases during the charging process (Han pg. 29781, col. 1, para. 2). Adding M salts leads to the co-insertion of M cations along with Li into Si during the lithiation process, stabilizing silicon anions by forming more stable Li−M−Si ternaries, which fundamentally changes the traditional Li−Si binary chemistry while minimally affecting silicon electrochemical profiles and theoretical capacities (Han abstract). Lu (US-20240154126-A1) teaches the anode electrode includes a second solid electrolyte ([0009]), a method for making a bipolar battery cell includes manufacturing a bipolar electrode by … forming an anode electrode by pressing a dry anode mixture including a second solid electrolyte, anode active material, a second conductive additive, and second PTFE particles … and press binding together the anode mixture; and laminating the cathode electrode and the anode electrode onto opposite sides of a bipolar current collector ([0011]), but teaches such mixture without the use of solvent ([0011, 0036-0037]). Lu further teaches high press density benefits energy density of electrode layers ([0045]). Dougherty (US-20110059340-A1) teaches the process used to meld the anode material and the cathode material together can just the use of pressure to form the bipolar plate ([0031]), and teaches liquid electrolytes including a lithium salt acting as a lithium ion carrier between the cathode and the anode ([0036]). Shimamura (US-20090233164-A1) teaches a slurry for a negative electrode is a solution containing the negative electrode active material and a raw material of a polymer gel electrolyte, a lithium salt or the like ([0177]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jessie Walls-Murray whose telephone number is (571)272-1664. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, typically 10-4. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Martin can be reached at (571) 270-7871. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JESSIE WALLS-MURRAY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1728
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 29, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12719112
SECONDARY CELL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
4y 9m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12695162
NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SECONDARY BATTERY
5y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689098
ENERGY STORAGE APPARATUS
5y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12683216
END CAP ASSEMBLY, BATTERY CELL, BATTERY, AND ELECTRICAL DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676391
Electrode Assembly, Secondary Battery and Method for Manufacturing the Same
4y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+25.6%)
3y 2m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 152 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month