Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 22, 2026
Application No. 18/649,615

Tremor Correction for Gesture Recognition

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Apr 29, 2024
Priority
Feb 08, 2016 — continuation of 10/429,935 +2 more
Examiner
SITTA, GRANT
Art Unit
2622
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Comcast Cable Communications LLC
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
695 granted / 958 resolved
+10.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1001
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§103
63.0%
+23.0% vs TC avg
§102
22.3%
-17.7% vs TC avg
§112
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 958 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1, 9 and 16 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-2, 8, and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 10429935. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the species covers the genus. 18649615 10429935 1(Currently Amended) A method comprising: receiving, by a computing device, motion input obtained by one or more sensors; detecting, based on comparing the received motion input with the a frequency threshold, a rhythmic motion in the received motion input; and based on the determining that the rhythmic motion satisfies the frequency threshold for at least a time duration threshold, filtering the motion input to suppress the rhythmic motion from further input from the one or more sensors 1. A method comprising: detecting, by a first computing device, a tremor in motion input obtained by one or more sensors; determining, by the first computing device, whether to filter the obtained motion input, wherein the determining is based on: one or more frequencies corresponding to predefined rhythmic gestures of valid user commands used by an application, and a frequency of the detected tremor; determining, by the first computing device, that a processing threshold has been satisfied, wherein the processing threshold is established based on a frequency of a rhythmic gesture command being higher than the frequency of the detected tremor; sending, to a second computing device, a request for rhythmic filtering to suppress the detected tremor and generate a filtered motion input; receiving, from the second computing device, the filtered motion input; and transmitting, by the first computing device and based on a comparison of the filtered motion input with the one or more frequencies, one or more user commands to the application. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein detecting the tremor comprises: determining that a pattern in the obtained motion input satisfies one or more predefined threshold values comprising at least a time value, a frequency value, or a combination thereof. 9. One or more non-transitory computer readable media storing instructions that, when executed cause: receiving motion input obtained by one or more sensors; detecting, based on comparing the received motion input with the a frequency threshold, a rhythmic motion in the received motion input; and based on the determining that the rhythmic motion satisfies the frequency threshold for at least a time duration threshold, filtering the motion input to suppress the rhythmic motion from further input from the one or more sensors 8. A method comprising: determining, by a first computing device, a first frequency corresponding to a predefined rhythmic gesture of a valid user command used by an application; detecting, by the first computing device, a tremor in motion input obtained by one or more sensors; determining, by the first computing device, that a processing threshold has been satisfied, wherein the processing threshold is established based on the predefined rhythmic gesture occurring at a higher frequency than the detected tremor; sending, to a second computing device, a request for rhythmic filtering to suppress the detected tremor and generate a first filtered motion input; and transmitting, by the first computing device and based on a comparison of the first filtered motion input with the first frequency, at least a first command to the application. 10. The method of claim 8, wherein detecting the tremor further comprises: determining, by the first computing device, a presence of the tremor based on a frequency of a periodic pattern in the obtained motion input satisfying a predefined temporal threshold and a predefined frequency threshold. 16. A system comprising: one or more sensor devices; a computing device, wherein the computing device comprises: one or more processors; and memory storing computer readable instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause first computing device to: receive, from the one or more sensors devices, motion input; detect, based on comparing the received motion input with the a frequency threshold, a rhythmic motion in the received motion input; and based on the determining that the rhythmic motion satisfies the frequency threshold for at least a time duration threshold, filtering the motion input to suppress the rhythmic motion from further input from the one or more sensors 1. A method comprising: detecting, by a first computing device, a tremor in motion input obtained by one or more sensors; determining, by the first computing device, whether to filter the obtained motion input, wherein the determining is based on: one or more frequencies corresponding to predefined rhythmic gestures of valid user commands used by an application, and a frequency of the detected tremor; determining, by the first computing device, that a processing threshold has been satisfied, wherein the processing threshold is established based on a frequency of a rhythmic gesture command being higher than the frequency of the detected tremor; sending, to a second computing device, a request for rhythmic filtering to suppress the detected tremor and generate a filtered motion input; receiving, from the second computing device, the filtered motion input; and transmitting, by the first computing device and based on a comparison of the filtered motion input with the one or more frequencies, one or more user commands to the application. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein detecting the tremor comprises: determining that a pattern in the obtained motion input satisfies one or more predefined threshold values comprising at least a time value, a frequency value, or a combination thereof. Claims 1, 9 and 16 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-2, 9,11,16, and 18 of U.S. Patent No. 11106283. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the species covers the genus. 18649615 11106283 1(Currently Amended) A method comprising: receiving, by a computing device, motion input obtained by one or more sensors; detecting, based on comparing the received motion input with the a frequency threshold, a rhythmic motion in the received motion input; and based on the determining that the rhythmic motion satisfies the frequency threshold for at least a time duration threshold, filtering the motion input to suppress the rhythmic motion from further input from the one or more sensors One or more non-transitory computer readable media storing instructions that, when executed cause: detecting a tremor in motion input obtained by one or more sensors; determining whether to filter the obtained motion input, wherein the determining is based on: one or more frequencies corresponding to predefined rhythmic gestures of valid user commands used by an application, and a frequency of the detected tremor; determining that a processing threshold has been satisfied, wherein the processing threshold is established based on a frequency of a rhythmic gesture command being higher than the frequency of the detected tremor; sending, to a computing device, a request for rhythmic filtering to suppress the detected tremor and generate a filtered motion input; receiving, from the computing device, the filtered motion input; and transmitting, based on a comparison of the filtered motion input with the one or more frequencies, one or more user commands to the application. 2. The one or more non-transitory computer readable media of claim 1, wherein the instructions, when executed, further cause detecting the tremor by: determining that a pattern in the obtained motion input satisfies one or more predefined threshold values comprising at least a time value, a frequency value, or a combination thereof. 9. One or more non-transitory computer readable media storing instructions that, when executed cause: receiving motion input obtained by one or more sensors; detecting, based on comparing the received motion input with the a frequency threshold, a rhythmic motion in the received motion input; and based on the determining that the rhythmic motion satisfies the frequency threshold for at least a time duration threshold, filtering the motion input to suppress the rhythmic motion from further input from the one or more sensors 9. One or more non-transitory computer readable media storing instructions that, when executed cause: determining a first frequency corresponding to a predefined rhythmic gesture of a valid user command used by an application; detecting a tremor in motion input obtained by one or more sensors; determining that a processing threshold has been satisfied, wherein the processing threshold is established based on the predefined rhythmic gesture occurring at a higher frequency than the detected tremor; sending, to a computing device, a request for rhythmic filtering to suppress the detected tremor and generate a first filtered motion input; and transmitting, based on a comparison of the first filtered motion input with the first frequency, at least a first command to the application. 11. The one or more non-transitory computer readable media of claim 9, wherein the instructions, when executed, further cause detecting the tremor by: determining a presence of the tremor based on a frequency of a periodic pattern in the obtained motion input satisfying a predefined temporal threshold and a predefined frequency threshold. 16. A system comprising: one or more sensor devices; a computing device, wherein the computing device comprises: one or more processors; and memory storing computer readable instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause first computing device to: receive, from the one or more sensors devices, motion input; detect, based on comparing the received motion input with the a frequency threshold, a rhythmic motion in the received motion input; and based on the determining that the rhythmic motion satisfies the frequency threshold for at least a time duration threshold, filtering the motion input to suppress the rhythmic motion from further input from the one or more sensors 16. A system comprising: a first computing device; one or more sensor devices; and a second computing device; wherein the first computing device comprises: one or more first processors; and memory storing first computer readable instructions that, when executed by the one or more first processors, cause the first computing device to: determine a first frequency corresponding to a predefined rhythmic gesture of a valid user command used by an application; detect a tremor in motion input obtained by the one or more sensor devices; determine that a processing threshold has been satisfied, wherein the processing threshold is established based on the predefined rhythmic gesture occurring at a higher frequency than the detected tremor; and transmit, based on a comparison of a first filtered motion input with the first frequency, at least a first command to the application, and wherein the second computing device comprises: one or more second processors; and memory storing second computer readable instructions that, when executed by the one or more second processors, cause the second computing device to: receive, from the first computing device, a request for rhythmic filtering to suppress the detected tremor and generate the first filtered motion input. 18. The system of claim 16, wherein the first computer readable instructions, when executed by the one or more first processors, further cause the first computing device to detect the tremor by: determining a presence of the tremor based on a frequency of a periodic pattern in the obtained motion input satisfying a predefined temporal threshold and a predefined frequency threshold. Claims 1, 9 and 16 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 14 and 20 of U.S. Patent No. 12001611. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the species covers the genus. 18649615 12001611 (Currently Amended) A method comprising: receiving, by a computing device, motion input obtained by one or more sensors; detecting, based on comparing the received motion input with the a frequency threshold, a rhythmic motion in the received motion input; and based on the determining that the rhythmic motion satisfies the frequency threshold for at least a time duration threshold, filtering the motion input to suppress the rhythmic motion from further input from the one or more sensors 14. A method comprising: receiving, by a computing device, motion input associated with a tracked object; based on a frequency of a rhythmic gesture being higher than a frequency of a tremor in the motion input, filtering, via a first filter, the motion input to generate filtered motion input; based on detecting residual rhythmic motion in the filtered motion input, filtering, via a second filter, the filtered motion input to suppress the residual rhythmic motion and generate a second filtered motion input; and sending, by the computing device and based on the second filtered motion input, one or more user commands to an application. 20. The method of claim 14, further comprising: detecting the tremor in the motion input based on a frequency of a periodic pattern in the motion input satisfying a temporal threshold and a frequency threshold. 9. One or more non-transitory computer readable media storing instructions that, when executed cause: receiving motion input obtained by one or more sensors; detecting, based on comparing the received motion input with the a frequency threshold, a rhythmic motion in the received motion input; and based on the determining that the rhythmic motion satisfies the frequency threshold for at least a time duration threshold, filtering the motion input to suppress the rhythmic motion from further input from the one or more sensors 14. A method comprising: receiving, by a computing device, motion input associated with a tracked object; based on a frequency of a rhythmic gesture being higher than a frequency of a tremor in the motion input, filtering, via a first filter, the motion input to generate filtered motion input; based on detecting residual rhythmic motion in the filtered motion input, filtering, via a second filter, the filtered motion input to suppress the residual rhythmic motion and generate a second filtered motion input; and sending, by the computing device and based on the second filtered motion input, one or more user commands to an application. 20. The method of claim 14, further comprising: detecting the tremor in the motion input based on a frequency of a periodic pattern in the motion input satisfying a temporal threshold and a frequency threshold. 16. A system comprising: one or more sensor devices; a computing device, wherein the computing device comprises: one or more processors; and memory storing computer readable instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause first computing device to: receive, from the one or more sensors devices, motion input; detect, based on comparing the received motion input with the a frequency threshold, a rhythmic motion in the received motion input; and based on the determining that the rhythmic motion satisfies the frequency threshold for at least a time duration threshold, filtering the motion input to suppress the rhythmic motion from further input from the one or more sensors 14. A method comprising: receiving, by a computing device, motion input associated with a tracked object; based on a frequency of a rhythmic gesture being higher than a frequency of a tremor in the motion input, filtering, via a first filter, the motion input to generate filtered motion input; based on detecting residual rhythmic motion in the filtered motion input, filtering, via a second filter, the filtered motion input to suppress the residual rhythmic motion and generate a second filtered motion input; and sending, by the computing device and based on the second filtered motion input, one or more user commands to an application. 20. The method of claim 14, further comprising: detecting the tremor in the motion input based on a frequency of a periodic pattern in the motion input satisfying a temporal threshold and a frequency threshold. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GRANT SITTA whose telephone number is (571)270-1542. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-4:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Patrick Edouard can be reached at 571-272-6084. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GRANT SITTA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2622
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Oct 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP
Jan 02, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §DP
May 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 27, 2026
Notice of Allowance
Jul 29, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12761699
COMPONENT CONTROL METHOD AND RELATED APPARATUS
1y 9m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12761743
ELECTRONIC PEN
1y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12752188
METHOD FOR DISPLAYING VIRTUAL INTERACTIVE OBJECT, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM THEREOF
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12754615
Indirect Motion Mapping Pipeline and Pinch Centroid
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12754032
AUGMENTED REALITY-BASED TRANSLATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH TRAVEL
1y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+13.2%)
3y 0m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 958 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month