Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/650,010

optical lens injection molding module

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Apr 29, 2024
Examiner
SCHIFFMAN, BENJAMIN A
Art Unit
1742
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Jun He Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% of resolved cases
65%
Career Allow Rate
590 granted / 910 resolved
At TC average
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
935
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
56.9%
+16.9% vs TC avg
§102
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§112
16.1%
-23.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 910 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The papers submitted on 06 January 2025, amending claim 1, are acknowledged. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and/or 102(a)(2) as being clearly anticipated by Wang (JP 3240938 U). See the machine translation submitted herewith (title, abstract, pp. 2-4 §§ DESCRIPTION-OF-EMBODIMENTS, Claims and FIG. 1-10). Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and/or 102(a)(2) as being clearly anticipated by Wang (TW M636957 U). See the machine translation submitted herewith (title, abstract, pp. 3-4, 6-7 §§ MODE-FOR-INVENTION, Claims; FIG. 1-10). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 06 January 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant contends that both Wang ‘938 and Wang ‘695 only recite “at least one temperature control channel” and therefore do not clearly anticipate the claimed “plurality of temperature controlled flow channels.” However, FIG. 4-5 and 7 of Wang ‘938 and Wang ‘695 show two separate channels and thus anticipate a plurality. Additionally, “at least one” broadly includes more than one and thus anticipates a plurality (MPEP § 2131.03). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Benjamin A Schiffman whose telephone number is (571)270-7626. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9a-530p EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christina Johnson can be reached at (571)272-1176. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BENJAMIN A SCHIFFMAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1742
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 29, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jan 06, 2026
Response Filed
Jan 30, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600071
MOLD CLAMPING METHOD FOR AN INJECTION MOLDING MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600637
A METHOD FOR PRODUCING A SOLID OBJECT FROM A BIOMATERIAL-BASED STARTING MATERIAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589529
RESIN SEALING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593642
METHOD OF PROCESSING A WAFER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589533
MOLDED FOAM MANUFACTURING APPARATUS AND SCREW FOR MOLDED FOAM MANUFACTURING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+28.2%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 910 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month