Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/650,666

METHOD OF SETTING AN EQUALIZER AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING A SETTING OF AN EQUALIZER

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 30, 2024
Examiner
HUANG, DAVID S
Art Unit
2852
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co. KG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
612 granted / 705 resolved
+18.8% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
722
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
50.8%
+10.8% vs TC avg
§102
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
§112
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 705 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The references listed in the Information Disclosure Statement(s) filed on 6/10/2024 have been considered by the examiner (see attached PTO-1449 form or PTO/SB/08A and 08B forms). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kim et al. (US 2003/0227968, hereinafter “Kim”). Regarding claims 1 and 13, Kim discloses a system for determining a setting of an equalizer to be set, the system (Fig. 3) comprises: the equalizer to be set (filtering unit 300, including FFF 310, Fig. 3, para. 0077); a signal input connected with an input of the equalizer (input x[k] to FFF 310, Fig. 3); a signal line connected with an output of the equalizer (output of FFF, Fig. 3); a decision module connected with the signal line (detector 320, connected to output of FFF 310, Fig. 3); and a setting module connected with the decision module (updater in main filtering unit 300 performs updating tap coefficients based on the error signals and the FFF input signal, para. 0085, Fig. 3), wherein the equalizer is preset with pre-defined settings (initialize tap-coefficients, step 411, Fig. 4), wherein the equalizer is configured to equalize an input signal with symbols received via the signal input so as to output an equalized signal via the signal line (calculate outputs of kth equalizer and detector y[k] and d[k], step S413, Fig. 4, para. 0090, and see FFF 310 of Fig. 3), wherein the decision module includes circuitry configured to detect symbols (calculate output of detector d[k], step S413, Fig. 4, para. 0090), wherein the setting module includes circuitry configured to set the equalizer based on the detected symbols (updater, para. 0077, and step S417, para. 0094), and wherein the system is configured to detect the symbols and to set the equalizer based on the detected symbols (main filtering unit 300 updates tap coefficients according to error signals and input signals of the FFF, para. 0094, Figs. 3 and 4); and repeating at least once the step of filtering the input signal, step of detecting symbols and the step of setting the equalizer (repeating equalization, para. 0095, see loop in Fig. 4). Regarding claims 3 and 15, Kim further discloses the setting module is connected with the signal input and the decision module so as to set the equalizer based on the detected symbols and the input signal (updater updates the tap coefficients based on error signals (i.e. output of the detector) and input signals of the FFF, para. 0094). Regarding claim 4, Kim further discloses the equalizer parameters are determined by processing the detected symbols, and wherein the equalizer is set by adjusting at least on equalizer parameter (updater updates tap coefficients based on error signals derived from the output of detector 320, see Fig. 3, para. 0094). Regarding claim 5, Kim further discloses the input signal is an unknown signal (blind equalization with no training sequence, para. 0021, 0065). Regarding claim 6, Kim further discloses the input signal is filtered by the equalizer without de-embedding the input signal previously (blind equalization does not use a training sequence, para. 0021, and input signal x[k] is directly input into filter 310, Fig. 3). Regarding claim 7, Kim further discloses the equalizer is set without de-embedding the input signal (equalizer tap coefficients updated according to FFF input and error signals based on detector output, para. 0094, which do not require de-embedding the input signal). Regarding claim 16, Kim further discloses the decision module includes circuitry configured to directly process the equalized signal in order to detect the symbols from the equalized signal (detector 320 directly receives output of main filtering 300, which is an “equalized signal”, see Fig. 3). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2, 8-12, 14, 17-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID S HUANG whose telephone number is (571)270-1798. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hannah Wang can be reached at (571) 272-9018. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /David S Huang/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2631 5/30/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 30, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 22, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676644
EDGE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM WITH CASCADED REPEATER DEVICES OVER WIRED MEDIUM
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671370
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION APPARATUS AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12650502
ELECTRONIC CIRCUIT FOR DETECTING AN ULTRA-WIDEBAND PULSE
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12652198
ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR FEEDING BACK CHANNEL STATE INFORMATION BY USING AUTOENCODER BASED ON MODIFIED SPLIT LEARNING, AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12647158
SIGNAL TRANSMISSION METHOD AND DEVICE, TERMINAL AND ACCESS NETWORK DEVICE
2y 12m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.3%)
2y 5m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 705 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month