Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/650,685

SYSTEM FOR ESTIMATING TEMPERATURE OF PERMANENT MAGNET OF ROTOR OF MOTOR

Non-Final OA §101§112
Filed
Apr 30, 2024
Priority
May 19, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0065204
Examiner
IMTIAZ, ZOHEB S
Art Unit
2846
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Hyundai Mobis Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
376 granted / 468 resolved
+12.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
491
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
80.0%
+40.0% vs TC avg
§102
12.7%
-27.3% vs TC avg
§112
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 468 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter. Step 1: Statutory Category Claim 1 is drawn to a “system” which is a machine and therefore is eligible and falls within one of the four statutory categories. Step 2a, Prong One – The claim recites a judicial exception The claim recites “ a first determination unit configured to determine whether a rotational speed of the rotor is greater than or equal to a reference speed” “a second determination unit configured to determine a first condition, ….. when the rotational speed is greater than or equal to the reference speed” “a magnetic flux map temperature estimation unit configured to estimate the temperature of the permanent magnet included in the rotor using a d-axis magnetic flux map of the motor responsive to one or more of the first condition and the second condition is satisfied in the second determination unit” “ an energy map temperature estimation unit configured to estimate the temperature of the permanent magnet using a q-axis energy map of the motor responsive to one or more of the first condition and the second condition not being satisfied in the second determination unit” The claim therefore recites steps of: Collecting data, comparing date to thresholds and estimating temperature using mathematical relationships utilizing the maps. These steps constitute mathematical concepts and mental processes, including mathematical comparisons and calculations used to estimate a parameter. Step 2a, Prong Two – The claim dose not integrate the judicial exception into a practical application The claim does not recite elements to integrate the abstract idea or calculation into a practical application. The additional elements include “”motor” or a “rotor” or a “permanent magnet” However, these elements merely provide an environment in which the abstract idea is applied The claims do not recite any specific control of the motor based on the estimated temperature. Therefore, the claim doesn’t integrate the abstract idea into practical application. Step 2b, Prong Two – The claim does not recite significantly more than the judicial exception. The claim doesn’t include additional elements sufficient to amount to significantly more than the abstract idea. The claim merely performs routine data analysis and estimation. Claim 1 therefore is directed to an abstract idea involving mathematical concepts and mental processes involving comparisons of motor operating parameters. However, the claim doesn’t integrate the abstract idea into a practical application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1 and 11 recite Q-axis energy” renders the claim indefinite because it leaves the examiner in doubt as to the meaning of the technical feature to which it refers to. Applicants are urged to clarify this as described in paragraph 89. Claim 1 and 11 includes a “second determination unit” which includes a first and a second condition which is fulfilled based on the “when the rotational speed is greater than or equal to the reference speed”. However, the claim leaves the examiner unclear whether this is applied to both the first and second condition; first condition only or the second condition. Applicants are urged to make proper correction. Dependent claims 2-10 and 12-20 are rejected based on dependency from claims 1 and 11. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZOHEB S IMTIAZ whose telephone number is (571)272-4308. The examiner can normally be reached 11am-730pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo Colon Santana can be reached at 571-272-2060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZOHEB S IMTIAZ/ Primary Examiner , Art Unit 2846
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 30, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §101, §112
Mar 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640670
FEEDFORWARD CURRENT CONTROL OF INDUCTION MACHINES
2y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12627220
POWER CONVERTER AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A POWER CONVERTER
2y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12620920
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SHIFTING OPERATION MODES OF VARIABLE FLUX MEMORY MOTORS
2y 6m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12620919
MOTOR DRIVER FOR STARTING UP MOTOR HAVING ANY RESISTANCE
1y 10m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12615002
MOTOR DRIVEN APPLIANCE AND PROTECTION METHOD THEREOF
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+14.4%)
2y 5m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 468 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month