Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/650,766

MOTOR DRIVE SYSTEM, CHARGING METHOD AND VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Apr 30, 2024
Examiner
PAUL, ANTONY M
Art Unit
2846
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Huawei Digital Power Technologies Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
560 granted / 627 resolved
+21.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
654
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
33.7%
-6.3% vs TC avg
§102
44.4%
+4.4% vs TC avg
§112
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 627 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DRAWINGS The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, (see claims 1, 7 and 13) the phrase, “wherein a second end of a first switch in a first bridge arm in the plurality of bridge arms is coupled to a first electrode of a power supply” is not shown. There is no connecting node shown connecting a second end of a first switch T1 in a first bridge arm 11A coupled to a first electrode 1 of a power supply. Currently a second end of a first switch T3 in a second bridge arm 11B (see figs.1-2, 4-5 & 8-9) in the plurality of bridge arms is coupled to a first electrode 1 of a power supply via switch K4 is shown with a connecting node. Power supply needs to be referenced. Reference 11 for power battery (see spec., para. [0052], page 10) needs to be shown. An electric vehicle (see claim 13) must be shown. Secondly, the phrase, “a motor drive system comprising: wherein the controller 12 obtain a rotor position angle of the motor 10; and control a bridge arm other than the first bridge arm in the plurality of bridge arms in a control manner corresponding to the rotor position angle to enable the power supply to charge the power battery must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). Controller 12 obtaining the position angle of motor 10 is not shown in any of motor drive system figs.1-2, 4-5 & 8-9. No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Objection to Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: The phrase, (see spec., para. [0007], page 2) “wherein a second end of a first switch in a first bridge arm in the plurality of bridge arms is coupled to a first electrode of a power supply” is not clear as there is no connecting node shown connecting a second end of a first switch T1 in a first bridge arm 11A coupled to a first electrode 1 of a power supply. Currently a second end of a first switch T3 in a second bridge arm 11B (see figs.1-2, 4-5 & 8-9) in the plurality of bridge arms is coupled to a first electrode 1 of a power supply via switch K4 is shown with a connecting node. The phrase, (see spec., para. [0052], page 10) “an anode of the power battery 11” is not clear. Is it the positive terminal of the power battery 11? The first bridge arm 11A may be coupled to any one of the plurality of bridge arms 11B-11C at a midpoint (see spec., para. [0057], page 11) is not clear. Figs.1-2, 4-5, 8-9 show bridge arms 11A, 11B, 111C connect via respective connecting point to connect windings S1, S2, S3 of motor 10. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections – 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. As to claims 1, 7 & 13, The phrase, “wherein a second end of a first switch in a first bridge arm in the plurality of bridge arms is coupled to a first electrode of a power supply” is not clear as there is no connecting node shown connecting a second end of a first switch T1 in a first bridge arm 11A coupled to a first electrode 1 of a power supply. Currently a second end of a first switch T3 in a second bridge arm 11B (see figs.1-2, 4-5 & 8-9) in the plurality of bridge arms is coupled to a first electrode 1 of a power supply via switch K4 is shown with a connecting node. Dependent claims 2-6 are rejected as they depend on rejected independent claim 1. Dependent claims 8-12 are rejected as they depend on rejected independent claim 7. Dependent claims 14-18 are rejected as they depend on rejected independent claim 13. Appropriate corrections and clarifications required. Claim Rejections – 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 7 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Aoyagi et al. (Pub.No.: US 2007/0024219 A1 and Aoyagi hereinafter) in view of Masahiro IEZAWA et al. (Pub.No.: US 2021/0067069 A1 and IEZAWA hereinafter). As to claim 1, A motor drive system, comprising: a plurality of bridge arms; a motor; and a controller; wherein each bridge arm of the plurality of bridge arms comprises a first switch and a second switch, a first end of the first switch is coupled to a first electrode of a power battery, a second end of the first switch is coupled to a first end of the second switch, and a second end of the second switch is coupled to a second electrode of the power battery; wherein the motor comprises a plurality of windings, the plurality of windings are in one-to-one correspondence with the plurality of bridge arms, a first end of each winding of the plurality of windings is coupled to a common endpoint, and a second end of each winding of the plurality of windings is coupled to a second end of a first switch in a corresponding bridge arm; wherein a second end of a first switch in a first bridge arm in the plurality of bridge arms is coupled to a first electrode of a power supply, and a second electrode of the power supply is coupled to the power battery; and wherein the controller is configured to: obtain a rotor position angle of the motor; and control a bridge arm other than the first bridge arm in the plurality of bridge arms in a control manner corresponding to the rotor position angle, to enable the power supply to charge the power battery. (As to claim 1, Aoyagi teaches (see figs.1-6, para. [0002], [0015]) a motor drive system (fig.1), comprising: a plurality of bridge arms ([Tr1-Tr2], [Tr3-Tr4], [Tr5-Tr6]) (of inverter 2); a motor 3; and a controller 15, 16, 17 (see fig.1, microcomputer, see para. [0019]); wherein each bridge arm [Tr1-Tr2]/[Tr3-Tr4]/ [Tr5-Tr6] of the plurality of bridge arms ([Tr1-Tr2], [Tr3-Tr4], [Tr5-Tr6]) comprises a first switch Tr1 and a second switch Tr2, a first end of the first switch Tr1 is coupled to a first electrode (P terminal, see fig.1) of a power battery 1 (fig.1), a second end of the first switch Tr1 is coupled to a first end of the second switch Tr2, and a second end of the second switch Tr2 is coupled to a second electrode (N terminal, see fig.1) of the power battery 1; wherein the motor 3 comprises a plurality of windings (see fig.1), the plurality of windings are in one-to-one correspondence (via U, V, W) with the plurality of bridge arms ([Tr1-Tr2], [Tr3-Tr4], [Tr5-Tr6]), a first end of each winding of the plurality of windings is coupled to a common endpoint (middle connecting point connecting windings, see fig.1), and a second end of each winding of the plurality of windings is coupled to a second end U/V/W of a first switch Tr1/Tr3/ Tr5 in a corresponding bridge arm [Tr1-Tr2]/[Tr3-Tr4]/ [Tr5-Tr6; wherein a second end of a first switch Tr1 in a first bridge arm [Tr1-Tr2] in the plurality of bridge arms ([Tr1-Tr2], [Tr3-Tr4], [Tr5-Tr6]) is coupled to a first electrode [positive] of a power supply 14 (via diode 10), and a second electrode [negative] of the power supply 14 is coupled to the power battery 1 (N terminal, see fig.1); and wherein the controller [15, 16, 17] (see fig.1, microcomputer, see para. [0019]) is configured to: obtain a rotor position of the motor 3 (see para. [0017]); and Aoyagi teaches control a bridge arm] [Tr3-Tr4]/ [Tr5-Tr6] other than the first bridge arm [Tr1-Tr2] in the plurality of bridge arms ([Tr1-Tr2], [Tr3-Tr4], [Tr5-Tr6]) in a control manner (motor drive mode control or Battery charge mode control, see figs.1-6) based on (rotor position sensing or rotor position estimation, see para. [0017]) to enable the power supply 14 to charge the power battery 1 (See para’s [0021], [0022] thru [0025] & figs.1, 3, 4, 5 & 6). Aoyagi teaches (see fig.1, para. [0017]) control a bridge arm (of inverter 2) based on rotor position, but does not mention rotor position angle. IEZAWA teaches a motor drive system (fig.1) wherein a bridge arm (23-24 of U phase/25-26 of V phase/27-28 of W phase (of inverter 21, see fig.1, para’s [0024] thru [0034]) is controlled (via control 18, 29, 30) based on corresponding rotor position angle (via rotor position angle sensor 16, see fig.1, para’s [0035]-[0036]), wherein a battery 13 is charged (see para. [0024]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claim invention to control a bridge arm based on corresponding rotor position angle of IEZAWA in the system of Aoyagi because rotation angle signal can be calculated with high accuracy (see IEZAWA, para. [0014]). As to claim 7, A charging method, applied to a motor drive system that includes a plurality of bridge arms and a motor, the method comprising; obtaining a rotor position angle of the motor, wherein each bridge arm of the plurality of bridge arms comprises a first switch and a second switch, a first end of the first switch is coupled to a first electrode of a power battery, a second end of the first switch is coupled to a first end of the second switch, and a second end of the second switch is coupled to a second electrode of the power battery, wherein the motor comprises a plurality of windings, the plurality of windings are in one-to-one correspondence with the plurality of bridge arms, a first end of each winding of the plurality of windings is coupled to a common endpoint, and a second end of each winding of the plurality of windings is coupled to a second end of a first switch in a corresponding bridge arm, and wherein a second end of a first switch in a first bridge arm in the plurality of bridge arms is coupled to a first electrode of a power supply, and a second electrode of the power supply is coupled to the power battery; and controlling a bridge arm other than the first bridge arm in the plurality of bridge arms in a control manner corresponding to the rotor position angle, to enable the power supply to charge the power battery. (As to claim 7, Aoyagi teaches (see figs.1-6, para. [0002], [0015]) a charging method (via figs.1-6, para’s [0010], [0011], [0012] & [0026]), applied to a motor drive system (fig.1) that includes a plurality of bridge arms ([Tr1-Tr2], [Tr3-Tr4], [Tr5-Tr6]) (of inverter 2) and a motor 3, the method (via figs.1-6, para’s [0010], [0011], [0012] & [0026]) comprising; obtaining a rotor position of the motor 3 (see para. [0017]); wherein each bridge arm [Tr1-Tr2]/[Tr3-Tr4]/ [Tr5-Tr6] of the plurality of bridge arms ([Tr1-Tr2], [Tr3-Tr4], [Tr5-Tr6]) comprises a first switch Tr1 and a second switch Tr2, a first end of the first switch Tr1 is coupled to a first electrode (P terminal, see fig.1) of a power battery 1 (fig.1), a second end of the first switch Tr1 is coupled to a first end of the second switch Tr2, and a second end of the second switch Tr2 is coupled to a second electrode (N terminal, see fig.1) of the power battery 1; wherein the motor 3 comprises a plurality of windings (see fig.1), the plurality of windings are in one-to-one correspondence (via U, V, W) with the plurality of bridge arms ([Tr1-Tr2], [Tr3-Tr4], [Tr5-Tr6]), a first end of each winding of the plurality of windings is coupled to a common endpoint (middle connecting point connecting windings, see fig.1), and a second end of each winding of the plurality of windings is coupled to a second end U/V/W of a first switch Tr1/Tr3/ Tr5 in a corresponding bridge arm [Tr1-Tr2]/[Tr3-Tr4]/ [Tr5-Tr6; wherein a second end of a first switch Tr1 in a first bridge arm [Tr1-Tr2] in the plurality of bridge arms ([Tr1-Tr2], [Tr3-Tr4], [Tr5-Tr6]) is coupled to a first electrode [positive] of a power supply 14 (via diode 10, see fig.1), and a second electrode [negative] of the power supply 14 is coupled to the power battery 1 (N terminal, see fig.1); and wherein the controller [15, 16, 17] (see fig.1, microcomputer, see para. [0019]) control a bridge arm] [Tr3-Tr4]/ [Tr5-Tr6] other than the first bridge arm [Tr1-Tr2] in the plurality of bridge arms ([Tr1-Tr2], [Tr3-Tr4], [Tr5-Tr6]) in a control manner (motor drive mode control or Battery charge mode control, see figs.1-6) based on (rotor position sensing or rotor position estimation, see para. [0017]) to enable the power supply 14 to charge the power battery 1 (See para’s [0021], [0022] thru [0025] & figs.1, 3, 4, 5 & 6). Aoyagi teaches (see fig.1, para. [0017]) control a bridge arm (of inverter 2) based on rotor position, but does not mention rotor position angle. IEZAWA teaches a motor drive system (fig.1) wherein a bridge arm (23-24 of U phase/25-26 of V phase/27-28 of W phase (of inverter 21, see fig.1, para’s [0024] thru [0034]) is controlled (via control 18, 29, 30) based on corresponding rotor position angle (via rotor position angle sensor 16, see fig.1, para’s [0035]-[0036]), wherein a battery 13 is charged (see para. [0024]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claim invention to control a bridge arm based on corresponding rotor position angle of IEZAWA in the system of Aoyagi because rotation angle signal can be calculated with high accuracy (see IEZAWA, para. [0014]). As to claim 13, An electric vehicle comprising a motor drive system, wherein the motor drive system comprises a plurality of bridge arms, a motor, and a controller; wherein each bridge arm of the plurality of bridge arms comprises a first switch and a second switch, a first end of the first switch is coupled to a first electrode of a power battery, a second end of the first switch is coupled to a first end of the second switch, and a second end of the second switch is coupled to a second electrode of the power battery; wherein the motor comprises a plurality of windings, the plurality of windings are in one-to-one correspondence with the plurality of bridge arms, a first end of each winding of the plurality of windings is coupled to a common endpoint, and a second end of each winding of the plurality of windings is coupled to a second end of a first switch in a corresponding bridge arm; wherein a second end of a first switch in a first bridge arm in the plurality of bridge arms is coupled to a first electrode of a power supply, and a second electrode of the power supply is coupled to the power battery; and wherein the controller is configured to: obtain a rotor position angle of the motor; and control a bridge arm other than the first bridge arm in the plurality of bridge arms in a control manner corresponding to the rotor position angle, to enable the power supply to charge the power battery. (As to claim 13, Aoyagi teaches (see figs.1-6, para. [0002], [0015]) an electric car (see para. [0031]) comprising a motor drive system (fig.1), wherein the motor drive system (fig.1) comprises: a plurality of bridge arms ([Tr1-Tr2], [Tr3-Tr4], [Tr5-Tr6]) (of inverter 2), a motor 3 and a controller 15, 16, 17 (see fig.1, microcomputer, see para. [0019]); wherein each bridge arm [Tr1-Tr2]/[Tr3-Tr4]/ [Tr5-Tr6] of the plurality of bridge arms ([Tr1-Tr2], [Tr3-Tr4], [Tr5-Tr6]) comprises a first switch Tr1 and a second switch Tr2, a first end of the first switch Tr1 is coupled to a first electrode (P terminal, see fig.1) of a power battery 1 (fig.1), a second end of the first switch Tr1 is coupled to a first end of the second switch Tr2, and a second end of the second switch Tr2 is coupled to a second electrode (N terminal, see fig.1) of the power battery 1; wherein the motor 3 comprises a plurality of windings (see fig.1), the plurality of windings are in one-to-one correspondence (via U, V, W) with the plurality of bridge arms ([Tr1-Tr2], [Tr3-Tr4], [Tr5-Tr6]), a first end of each winding of the plurality of windings is coupled to a common endpoint (middle connecting point connecting windings, see fig.1), and a second end of each winding of the plurality of windings is coupled to a second end U/V/W of a first switch Tr1/Tr3/ Tr5 in a corresponding bridge arm [Tr1-Tr2]/[Tr3-Tr4]/ [Tr5-Tr6; wherein a second end of a first switch Tr1 in a first bridge arm [Tr1-Tr2] in the plurality of bridge arms ([Tr1-Tr2], [Tr3-Tr4], [Tr5-Tr6]) is coupled to a first electrode [positive] of a power supply 14 (via diode 10), and a second electrode [negative] of the power supply 14 is coupled to the power battery 1 (N terminal, see fig.1); and wherein the controller [15, 16, 17] (see fig.1, microcomputer, see para. [0019]) is configured to: obtain a rotor position of the motor 3 (see para. [0017]); and Aoyagi teaches control a bridge arm] [Tr3-Tr4]/ [Tr5-Tr6] other than the first bridge arm [Tr1-Tr2] in the plurality of bridge arms ([Tr1-Tr2], [Tr3-Tr4], [Tr5-Tr6]) in a control manner (motor drive mode control or Battery charge mode control, see figs.1-6) based on (rotor position sensing or rotor position estimation, see para. [0017]) to enable the power supply 14 to charge the power battery 1 (See para’s [0021], [0022] thru [0025] & figs.1, 3, 4, 5 & 6). Aoyagi teaches (see fig.1, para. [0017]) control a bridge arm (of inverter 2) based on rotor position, but does not mention rotor position angle. IEZAWA teaches a motor drive system (fig.1) wherein a bridge arm (23-24 of U phase/25-26 of V phase/27-28 of W phase (of inverter 21, see fig.1, para’s [0024] thru [0034]) is controlled (via control 18, 29, 30) based on corresponding rotor position angle (via rotor position angle sensor 16, see fig.1, para’s [0035]-[0036]), wherein a battery 13 is charged (see para. [0024]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claim invention to control a bridge arm based on corresponding rotor position angle of IEZAWA in the system of Aoyagi because rotation angle signal can be calculated with high accuracy (see IEZAWA, para. [0014]). Allowable Subject-Matter Claims 2-6, 8-12, and 14-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a respective rejected base claim 1, 7 and 13, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 2-6, 8-12, and 14-18 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: As to claim 2, Aoyagi and IEZAWA fails to teach controlling main switches in two bridge arms other than the first bridge arm in the plurality of bridge arms to be periodically in a turn-on state at a same turn-on start moment and a same turn-on end moment based on the control manner corresponding to the rotor position angle being the parallel in-phase control manner; or controlling main switches in two bridge arms other than the first bridge arm in the plurality of bridge arms to be periodically in a tum-on state at different tum-on start moments and/or different turn-on end moments based on the control manner corresponding to the rotor position angle being the parallel interleaved control manner; or controlling a main switch in any bridge arm other than the first bridge arm in the plurality of bridge arms to be periodically in a turn-on state based on the control manner corresponding to the rotor position angle being the series control manner; and wherein: based on the second electrode of the power supply being coupled to the first electrode of the power battery, the main switch is the first switch; or based on the second electrode of the power supply being coupled to the second electrode of the power battery, the main switch is the second switch. Allowable Claim 3 depend on allowable claim 2. As to claim 4, Aoyagi and IEZAWA fails to teach the control manner corresponding to the rotor position angle is based on a preset relationship between a position angle set and a control manner, the relationship between a position angle set and a control manner comprises a correspondence between different position angle sets and different control manners, and each position angle set comprises one or more position angles. Allowable Claim 5 depend on allowable claim 4. As to claim 6, Aoyagi and IEZAWA fails to teach the controller is further configured to: before obtaining the rotor position angle of the motor, determine that a vehicle to which the motor drive system belongs is in a stop state or a parking state. As to claim 8, Aoyagi and IEZAWA fails to teach controlling main switches in two bridge arms other than the first bridge arm in the plurality of bridge arms to be periodically in a turn-on state at a same turn-on start moment and a same turn-on end moment based on the control manner corresponding to the rotor position angle being the parallel in-phase control manner; or controlling main switches in two bridge arms other than the first bridge arm in the plurality of bridge arms to be periodically in a tum-on state at different turn-on start moments and/or different turn-on end moments based on the control manner corresponding to the rotor position angle being the parallel interleaved control manner; or controlling a main switch in any bridge arm other than the first bridge arm in the plurality of bridge arms to be periodically in a turn-on state based on the control manner corresponding to the rotor position angle being the series control manner; and wherein: based on the second electrode of the power supply being coupled to the first electrode of the power battery, the main switch is the first switch; or based on the second electrode of the power supply being coupled to the second electrode of the power battery, the main switch is the second switch. Allowable Claim 9 depend on allowable claim 8. As to claim 10, Aoyagi and IEZAWA fails to teach the control manner corresponding to the rotor position angle is based on a preset relationship between a position angle set and a control manner, the relationship between a position angle set and a control manner comprises a correspondence between different position angle sets and different control manners, and each position angle set comprises one or more position angles. Allowable Claim 11 depend on allowable claim 10. As to claim 12, Aoyagi and IEZAWA fails to teach before the obtaining the rotor position angle of the motor, the method further comprises: determining that a vehicle to which the motor drive system belongs is in a stop state or a parking state. As to claim 14, Aoyagi and IEZAWA fails to teach controlling main switches in two bridge arms other than the first bridge arm in the plurality of bridge arms to be periodically in a turn-on state at a same turn-on start moment and a same turn-on end moment based on the control manner corresponding to the rotor position angle being the parallel in-phase control manner; or controlling main switches in two bridge arms other than the first bridge arm in the plurality of bridge arms to be periodically in a tum-on state at different tum-on start moments and/or different turn-on end moments based on the control manner corresponding to the rotor position angle being the parallel interleaved control manner; or controlling a main switch in any bridge arm other than the first bridge arm in the plurality of bridge arms to be periodically in a turn-on state based on the control manner corresponding to the rotor position angle being the series control manner; and wherein: based on the second electrode of the power supply being coupled to the first electrode of the power battery, the main switch is the first switch; or based on the second electrode of the power supply being coupled to the second electrode of the power battery, the main switch is the second switch. Allowable Claim 15 depend on allowable claim 14. As to claim 16, Aoyagi and IEZAWA fails to teach the control manner corresponding to the rotor position angle is based on a preset relationship between a position angle set and a control manner, the relationship between a position angle set and a control manner comprises a correspondence between different position angle sets and different control manners, and each position angle set comprises one or more position angles. Allowable Claim 17 depend on allowable claim 16. As to claim 18, Aoyagi and IEZAWA fails to teach before obtaining the rotor position angle of the motor, determine that a vehicle to which the motor drive system belongs is in a stop state or a parking state. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTONY M PAUL whose telephone number is (571)270-1608. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8 am to 4 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mr. Eduardo Colon Santana can be reached at 571-272-2060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTONY M PAUL/ Primary Examiner of Art Unit 2846
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 30, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12580464
DYNAMIC POLE CONFIGURATION CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12556121
DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING MOTOR FOR VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12542439
Switched Reconfigurable Multi-Converter Multi-Source Energy Storage System Configuration for Electrified Vehicles and Power Flow Control Scheme Thereof
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12539777
ELECTRIC DRIVE SYSTEM, POWERTRAIN, HEATING METHOD, AND ELECTRIC VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12537425
DRIVE DEVICE FOR ROTATING ELECTRIC MACHINE AND DRIVE METHOD FOR ROTATING ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+9.7%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 627 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month