Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 18/651,220

Coupling Device

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Apr 30, 2024
Examiner
MCMAHON, MATTHEW R
Art Unit
3678
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Orlando Health Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allowance Rate
425 granted / 741 resolved
+5.4% vs TC avg
Strong +52% interview lift
Without
With
+52.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
765
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
42.3%
+2.3% vs TC avg
§102
27.6%
-12.4% vs TC avg
§112
27.1%
-12.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 741 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Claims Claims 1-22 are pending in the application. Claims 11-22 have been withdrawn from current consideration (see below). Claims 1-10 remain under current consideration by the Examiner. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-10, in the reply filed on 03 June 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 11-22 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 03 June 2026. Claim Interpretation – Functional Language From the outset, it should be noted that some of the language in the claims is functional in nature. For example, in claims 1-10 the language related to a “first material” and a “second material” is functional in nature and limited patentable weight is given to this section of the claim. Additionally, Examiner notes that while features of an apparatus may be recited either structurally or functionally, claims directed to an apparatus must be distinguished from the prior art in terms of structure rather than function. Apparatus claims cover what a device is, not what a device does and thus, a prior art device must only be capable of performing the stated function in order to read on the functional limitation. In this instance, the prior art discloses every structural limitation of the claim and thus this limitation fails to distinguish the claimed apparatus from that of the prior art. Please see MPEP 2114. [Examiner notes that this section of the Office Action does not constitute a rejection or objection, but is merely meant to indicate the manner in which the claims have been interpreted by the Examiner.] Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Re Claim 9: Claim 9 recites the limitation "the first biasing member" in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim or in claim 1, from which the claim depends. For examination purposes, for this Office Action only, the Examiner will interpret this limitation as --a first biasing member--. Clarification and correction are required. Examiner notes that any prior art rejections made in this Office Action are made in view of the claims, as best understood by the Examiner, in view of the above indefiniteness rejections. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kapadia (US Patent 10,799,304). PNG media_image1.png 652 833 media_image1.png Greyscale Re Claim 1: Kapadia discloses a coupling device, comprising: an inner shaft (482); a claw assembly (410, 450) pivotably coupled to the inner shaft, the claw assembly comprising at least one claw (410) pivotable around a claw pivot point (490) between a first state (see Figs. 7A, and 8B) and a second state (see Figs. 3-4, 6A, and 8A); and an outer cap (200) movably coupled to the inner shaft (482), wherein the outer cap (200) is movable (relative to the drive member 482) between a proximal position (see Figs. 7A, and 8B) and a distal position (see Figs. 3-4, 6A, and 8A), wherein the claw assembly (410, 450) extends distal to the outer cap (200), wherein the outer cap (200) is configured such that when the outer cap is in the proximal position, the claw assembly is in the first state (see Figs. 7A, and 8B), and when the outer cap is in the distal position, the claw assembly is in the second state (see Figs. 3-4, 6A, and 8A), wherein when the claw assembly is in the first state, the claw assembly (410, 450) is configured to receive a first material within the claw assembly to couple the first material (for example, as shown for trocar “T”; see Fig. 8B) to the coupling device, and wherein when the claw assembly is in the second state, the claw assembly and a distal surface of the outer cap are configured to receive (i.e. capable of receiving, for example, in the gap shown in annotated Fig. 8A below) a second material (see the note above related to this functional element) therebetween to couple the second material to the coupling device. PNG media_image2.png 442 1032 media_image2.png Greyscale Re Claim 2: Kapadia discloses a coupling device, wherein when the claw assembly (410, 450) is in the second state (see Figs. 3-4, 6A, and 8A), the claw assembly and the distal surface of the outer cap are configured to pinch the second material (see note above related to this functional element) therebetween to couple the second material to the coupling device. Re Claim 3: Kapadia discloses a coupling device, wherein the claw assembly (410, 450) is configured to release the second material when the claw assembly is in the first state (see Figs. 7A, and 8B). Re Claim 4: Kapadia discloses a coupling device, wherein the claw assembly (410, 450) comprises at least two claws (410, 450), each claw pivotable around a respective pivot point (490; Fig. 5) to pivot the at least two claws to the first state (see Figs. 7A, and 8B)wherein distal ends of the at least two claws are brought together, and to the second state (see Figs. 3-4, 6A, and 8A) wherein the distal ends of the at least two claws are spread apart. Re Claim 5: Kapadia discloses a coupling device, wherein the coupling device is configured to connect to the first or second material (see note above related to these functional elements) such that the first or second material and the coupling device move together. Re Claim 6: Kapadia discloses a coupling device, wherein the outer cap (200) includes a side wall (the sides of the main housing portion 200), an inner lumen (the cavity formed by the main housing portion 200 and its closing member; see Fig. 8A) enclosed by the side wall, and an inner member (520) disposed in the inner lumen, wherein the inner shaft (482) supports a first biasing member (530), and at least a portion of the inner shaft extends into the inner lumen of the outer cap, and wherein when the outer cap is in the proximal position, the first biasing member (530) is in a compressed state, applying a distal force on the inner member. Re Claim 7: Kapadia discloses a coupling device, wherein the inner shaft (482) includes a first side wall, a second side wall (the walls forming opposing sides of drive member 482), and a space (488) disposed between the first side wall and the second side wall, and wherein the space is configured to allow the inner member (520) to move distally or proximally in the space when the outer cap moves distally or proximally. Re Claim 8: Kapadia discloses a coupling device, wherein the at least one claw (410, 450) has a button portion (release mechanism 650; see the embodiment of Figs. 7A-7B), wherein a side wall of the outer cap (200) includes at least one opening (see the openings accommodating release mechanism 600 in, for example, Fig. 8A) configured to allow the button portion (650) of the at least one claw (410, 450) to at least partially extend through the at least one opening when the claw assembly is in the first state (see Fig. 7A). Re Claim 9, as best understood by the Examiner: Kapadia discloses a coupling device, wherein the button portion (650) of the at least one claw (410, 450) is configured to be pressed (at 658; Fig. 7A) inward through the at least one opening such that the button portion pivots out of the at least one opening such that the outer cap is moved distally (relative to the drive member 482) by a first biasing member (530). Re Claim 10: Kapadia discloses a coupling device, wherein the inner shaft (482) supports at least one second biasing member (535), and wherein the at least one second biasing member is configured to bias the at least one claw (410, 450) toward the first state (see Fig. 7A). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW R MCMAHON whose telephone number is (571)270-3067. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amber Anderson can be reached at (571) 270-5281. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW R MCMAHON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3678
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 30, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12692891
FASTENER FOR EXPANDABLE BARRIER
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12687194
TRIAXIAL SPHERICAL UNIVERSAL JOINT STRUCTURE
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12680566
DEVICE, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR LOCKING A CONNECTION ELEMENT
4y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12667184
FASTENER SYSTEM FOR SLATTED CONSTRUCTION
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662846
GROUND SLEEVE FOR INSTALLING A FENCE POST
4y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+52.5%)
3y 2m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 741 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month