Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/651,346

AC-DC Power Converter with Multi-Port DC Output Circuit

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 30, 2024
Priority
May 02, 2023 — provisional 63/499,540
Examiner
BEHM, HARRY RAYMOND
Art Unit
2838
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Silanna Asia Pte. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
919 granted / 1156 resolved
+11.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1190
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
77.3%
+37.3% vs TC avg
§102
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
§112
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1156 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 4/17/2026 with respect to claim 1 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues it cannot be said that any node of switch SWB is electrically connected to TO1 because of intervening series switch SWA. Examiner respectfully disagrees since the source of SWB is electrically connected to node TO1 through switch SWA. When switch SWA is on, or when the voltage of TO1 is a diode voltage drop higher than the source of SWB, SWB is electrically connected to TO1. The rejection of claim 1 has been maintained below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Yeh (US 2021/0223838). With respect to claim 1, Yeh discloses a power converter comprising, an AC/DC converter (Fig. 5 211) configured to generate a first secondary side output voltage (Fig. 5 voltage CT1) based on an AC input voltage (Fig. 1 voltage from 102) , the first secondary side output voltage being a first DC voltage (Fig. 5 voltage TO1); and a multi-port DC output circuit (Fig. 5 P1,P2,130) configured to receive the first secondary side output voltage from a first output node (Fig. 5 TO1) of the AC/DC converter and to provide respective DC output voltages (Fig. 5 voltages CT1,CT2) to a first DC output port (Fig. 5 C1) and a second DC output port (Fig. 5 C2), the multi-port DC output circuit comprising a first intermediate rail voltage switch (Fig. 5 SWA), a second intermediate rail voltage switch (Fig. 5 SWB), and a plurality of bus switches (Fig. 5 SW1,SW2), a body diode of the first intermediate rail voltage switch being forward biased (Fig. 5 body diode of SWA forward biased from TO1 to TO2 when 231 powers C2) with respect to the first secondary side output voltage, and a body diode of the second intermediate rail voltage switch (Fig. 5 body diode SWB reversed biased from TO1 to TO2 when 120 off) being reverse biased with respect to the first secondary side output voltage; wherein: a first node (Fig. 5 source SWA) of the first intermediate rail voltage switch is electrically connected to the first output node (Fig. 5 TO1) of the AC/DC converter; a first node (Fig. 5 drain SWB) of the second intermediate rail voltage switch is electrically connected (Fig. 5 drain SWB electrically connected to TO1 through SWA) to the first output node (Fig. 5 TO1) of the AC/DC converter; the plurality of bus switches are configured to control a routing (Fig. 5 SW1 routes PO1 to C1, SW2 routes PO1 to C2 from 120,SW2 routes PO2 to C1 through 120, SW2 routes PO2 to C2) of a first intermediate rail voltage and a second intermediate rail voltage (Fig. 5 voltage TO2) of the multi-port DC output circuit to the first DC output port and the second DC output port in response to a plurality of gate control signals (Fig. 5 gate signals from 131 and 132). With respect to claim 2, Yeh discloses the power converter of claim 1, wherein: the plurality of bus switches are configured to control the routing of the first intermediate rail voltage and a second intermediate rail voltage of the multi-port DC output circuit to the first DC output port and the second DC output port based on respective desired output voltages (Fig 5 voltages at C1 and C2) of each of the first DC output port and the second DC output port. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yeh (US 2021/0223838) in view of Shah (US 2021/0058005). With respect to claim 3, Yeh discloses the power converter of claim 1 as set forth above, and remains silent as to the details of the gate drive which were well known before the effective filing date of the invention. Shah discloses wherein a gate control signal of the plurality of gate control signals is generated using a charge pump circuit (Fig. 1 139) to control a first voltage switch (Fig. 1 138); and a voltage level of the gate control signal (Fig. 2 Vbus_ctrl) is configured to reduce an RDS (on) of the first voltage switch as compared to an RDS (on) of the first intermediate rail voltage switch when controlled by a lower voltage level of the gate control signal (Fig. 2 238 lower gate source voltage results in higher drain source resistance). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to implement a gate control signal of the plurality of gate control signals is generated using a charge pump circuit to control the first intermediate rail voltage switch; and a voltage level of the gate control signal is configured to reduce an RDS (on) of the first intermediate rail voltage switch as compared to an RDS (on) of the first intermediate rail voltage switch when controlled by a lower voltage level of the gate control signal, in order to drive the first intermediate rail voltage switch with a gate voltage higher than the source voltage to turn the switch fully on. Claim(s) 18-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yeh (US 2021/0223838) in view of Liu (US 2021/0021199). With respect to claim 18, Yeh discloses the power converter of claim 1, further comprising: a transformer (Fig. 5 TX1) having a primary winding and a secondary winding, a first winding node of the primary winding being configured to be coupled to a voltage source (Fig. 5 voltage from 221) to receive an input voltage, the secondary winding being configured to provide the first secondary side output voltage (Fig. 5 voltage CT1); and a switching stage (Fig. 5 241) on the primary side, and a synchronous rectifier switch (Fig. 5 M1) electrically connected to the secondary winding. Yeh remains silent as to the details of the primary side switching which were well known before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Liu discloses a main switch (Fig. 1 114) coupled to a second winding node (Fig. 1 131) of the primary winding (Fig. 1 108) to control a current (Fig. 1 IQL) through the primary winding and an active clamp circuit (Fig. 1 116) electrically connected to the primary winding. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to implement a main switch coupled to a second winding node of the primary winding to control a current through the primary winding; an active clamp circuit electrically connected to the primary winding. In order to recirculate the primary current as turn off of the main switch in order to prevent inductive voltage spikes. With respect to claim 19, Yeh in view of Liu make obvious the power converter of claim 18, wherein: the plurality of bus switches are configured to control (Fig. 5 130) a routing of the first intermediate rail voltage and the second intermediate rail voltage of the multi-port DC output circuit to the first DC output port (Fig. 5 C1) and the second DC output port (Fig. 5 C2) based on a respective desired output voltage (Fig. 5 desired output voltage at C1,C2) at each of the first DC output port and the second DC output port and in response to a portion of a switching cycle of the main switch. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 11-12 are allowed, while Claims 4-10 and 13-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. See the action dated 1/21/2026 for the reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HARRY RAYMOND BEHM whose telephone number is (571)272-8929. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thienvu Tran can be reached at 571-270-1276. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HARRY R BEHM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 30, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 17, 2026
Response Filed
May 01, 2026
Final Rejection (signed) — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640665
POWER INVERTER AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A POWER INVERTER
2y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633485
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR SAFETY SWITCH OFF OF AN ELECTRICAL CONSUMER IN A VEHICLE
2y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12627242
TECHNIQUES FOR TRANSITIONING BETWEEN CONTROL MODES OF AN ACTIVE FRONT END UNIT
3y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12627139
SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF POWER-VOLTAGE DROOP CONTROL FOR A DIRECT CURRENT (DC) MICROGRID
2y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12609529
Photovoltaic Power Generation System Control Method, Photovoltaic Power Generation System, and Switching Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+7.3%)
2y 5m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1156 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month