Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 26, 2026
Application No. 18/651,600

HIGH-EFFICIENCY PRECOOLING SYSTEM FOR A DATA CENTER

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 30, 2024
Examiner
CRUM, JACOB R
Art Unit
2835
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Klein Bradley John
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
487 granted / 653 resolved
+6.6% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
677
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
56.2%
+16.2% vs TC avg
§102
23.7%
-16.3% vs TC avg
§112
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 653 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group 1, claims 1-16, in the reply filed on 6/23/2026 is acknowledged. Claim 17 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-7 and 9-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Carlson (US 20110100045 A1). As to claim 1, Carlson discloses: A precooling system 100 (Fig. 1) for a data center 101, wherein the data center comprises an enclosure 101 with a containment structure (below 105) located therein, wherein the containment structure, in turn, comprises at least one computer rack 102 configured to pass air therethrough and an enclosed containment space 108, the precooling system comprises: a first heat exchanger 112 with a first air inlet (right) configured to accept air flowing from the enclosed containment space 108, a first air outlet (left), and a first plurality of heat-exchanging fluid passages (cooling coils; par. 0037) configured to extract heat from and, thereby, cool the air passing from the first air inlet to the first air outlet, wherein the heat is extracted into the fluid circulating therethrough, a second heat exchanger 118 (direct free cooling embodiment – see par. 0048 and par. 0045) with a second air inlet (into 118) configured to accept air outside the containment structure, a second air outlet (out of 118) configured to exhaust air outside the containment structure, and a second plurality of heat-exchanging fluid passages configured to extract heat from and, thereby, cool the fluid circulating therethrough (direct free cooling - see par. 0048 and 0045), and a fluid pump (any of pumps 120, 124, 128, 132) configured to circulate the fluid between the first heat exchanger and the second heat exchanger (in the direct free cooling embodiment), wherein the containment structure is configured to allow air to flow from the enclosed containment space 108 into the first air inlet of the first heat exchanger 112, wherein the enclosure of the data center is configured to allow air from the first air outlet of the first heat exchanger 112 to be directed toward and through the at least one computer rack 102, thereby air-cooling thereof, before flowing into the enclosed containment space (exhausted warm air flows through 104 to an inlet of fan 110 and back down to 108; par. 0035, 0092. As to claim 2, Carlson discloses: wherein the first heat exchanger further comprises a first air pump 110 configured to cause air to pass from the first air inlet to the first air outlet. As to claim 3, Carlson discloses: wherein the second heat exchanger further comprises a second air pump (see fan on top of 118; Fig. 1) configured to cause air to pass from the second air inlet to the second air outlet. As to claim 4, Carlson discloses: wherein the first heat exchanger 112 is positioned to facilitate the first air inlet to capture air from the containment structure 108, thereby facilitating cooling thereof while passing therethrough. As to claim 5, Carlson discloses: wherein the first heat exchanger 112 is located above or on a side (side) of the enclosed containment space 108 with the first air inlet configured to accept air therefrom. As to claim 6, Carlson discloses: wherein the data center comprises a ductwork (outlet of fan 110, funneled top of plenum 108, attic 105, warm air plenums 104) configured to direct air from the containment structure (below 105) to the first air inlet of the first heat exchanger 112. As to claim 7, Carlson discloses: wherein the ductwork comprises a chimney 104a, 104b configured to direct air from the containment space toward a ceiling of the data center 101. As to claim 9, Carlson discloses: wherein the first outlet of the first heat exchanger is configured to direct airflow (at least indirectly) to an air conditioning system (supplemental air conditioner for cooling/dehumidifying/exchanging outside air for the workspace 106; par. 0042-0043;) for additional cooling after passing through the first heat exchanger. As to claim 10, Carlson discloses: further comprising a controller (system responds to one or more thermostats; par. 0058) equipped with a plurality of temperature sensors (one or more thermostats, sensors 192; par. 0058-0059) configured to (capable of) monitor air temperature in the at least one computer rack (thermostats near the servers; par. 0059), as well as before (in the warm air plenums 104; par. 0059) and after passing through the first heat exchanger (see 192 in Fig. 1). As to claim 11, Carlson discloses: wherein the controller is configured to (capable of) initiate, terminate, or adjust the operation of the precooling system depending on the temperature reading throughout thereof (“In operation, system 100 may respond to signals from one or more sensors 192 placed in system 100”; par. 0058) or on a time-scheduled basis. As to claim 12, Carlson discloses: wherein the enclosed containment space is defined by the at least one computer rack 102a on at least one side thereof (left side of the containment space), a floor of the data center on a bottom thereof (floor of the data center), a first inlet of the first heat exchanger 112a on a top or a side thereof (side of the heat exchanger), and wherein other sides of the enclosed containment space are formed by other computer racks 102b or by one or more physical barriers to airflow (ceiling), thereby forming an airflow path through the at least one computer rack and into the first air inlet of the first heat exchanger (see arrows). As to claim 13, Carlson discloses: wherein other sides of the enclosed containment space are formed by at least one wall of the data center (e.g., front and rear walls, not illustrated) or at least one more computer rack (102b). As to claim 14, Carlson discloses: wherein each computer rack 102a, 102b is associated with a first heat exchanger 112a, 112b, wherein airflow from each computer rack is passed through the first heat exchanger for precooling purposes. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 8 and 15-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Carlson (US 20110100045 A1) as applied to claims 1 and 12 above, and further in view of Noteboom (US 20100263825 A1). As to claim 8, Carlson discloses: wherein the data center comprises two spaced apart rows of computer racks 102a, 102b with backs of computer racks in each of the two rows facing each other and, forming the enclosed space for accepting the air passing through the computer racks on both sides thereof. Carlson does not explicitly disclose: wherein the data center comprises two spaced apart rows of computer racks with backs of computer racks in each of the two rows facing each other and, together with the first heat exchanger positioned on top and bridging a gap between two rows of computer racks, forming the enclosed space for accepting the air passing through the computer racks on both sides thereof. However, Noteboom discloses: wherein the data center (Fig. 1-5) comprises two spaced apart rows of computer racks with backs of computer racks 304 (server racks; par. 0033; Fig. 3) in each of the two rows facing each other and, together with the first heat exchanger 300 positioned on top and bridging a gap between two rows of computer racks, forming the enclosed space 302 (cold row encapsulation structure) for accepting the air passing through the computer racks on both sides thereof; in order to cool the servers (par. 0033). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the related art(s) before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Carlson as suggested by Noteboom, e.g., providing: wherein the data center comprises two spaced apart rows of computer racks with backs of computer racks in each of the two rows facing each other and, together with the first heat exchanger positioned on top and bridging a gap between two rows of computer racks, forming the enclosed space for accepting the air passing through the computer racks on both sides thereof; in order to cool the servers. Additionally, all claimed elements were known in the prior art and one skilled in the art could have combined/modified the elements as claimed by known methods with no change in their respective functions, and the combination/modification would have yielded predictable results to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. See KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S.___, 82 USPQ2d 1385 (2007). As to claim 15, Carlson does not explicitly disclose: wherein at least one side of the enclosed containment space is formed by an openable physical barrier. However, Noteboom discloses: wherein at least one side of the enclosed containment space (cold row encapsulation structure; par. 0023; Fig. 1) is formed by an openable physical barrier (door; par. 0023, 0030); in order to provide a door/multiple doors for entrance/maintenance (par. 0030). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the related art(s) before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Carlson as suggested by Noteboom, e.g., providing: wherein at least one side of the enclosed containment space is formed by an openable physical barrier; in order to provide a door/multiple doors for entrance/maintenance. Additionally, all claimed elements were known in the prior art and one skilled in the art could have combined/modified the elements as claimed by known methods with no change in their respective functions, and the combination/modification would have yielded predictable results to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. See KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S.___, 82 USPQ2d 1385 (2007). As to claim 16, Carlson in view of Noteboom discloses: wherein the openable physical barrier is a door (par. 0023, 0030; Noteboom), a screen, a curtain, or a temporary partition. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Tozer (US 20120103591 A1) discloses a free cooling system for a data center. Endo (US 10299411 B2) discloses a data center cooling system with enclosed containment space. Keisling (US 8297067 B2) discloses a data center with back to back server racks forming an enclosed containment space and a heat exchanger/cooling system. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JACOB R CRUM whose telephone number is (571)270-7665. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9:00 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jayprakash Gandhi can be reached at (571) 270-1985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JACOB R CRUM/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2841
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 30, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Sep 23, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12744176
HYBRID CONDUCTIVE PASTE FOR FAST-OPENING, LOW-RATING FUSES
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733141
DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12725749
FUSIBLE LINK UNIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12727115
LIQUID COOLING HEAT DISSIPATION SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12720708
LIQUID COOLANT CIRCULATION SYSTEM, CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR, AND PROGRAM
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+27.9%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 653 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month