Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/651,954

FACILITY CONTROL SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 01, 2024
Priority
Dec 22, 2021 — continuation of PCTJP2021047640
Examiner
BARNES-BULLOCK, CRYSTAL JOY
Art Unit
2117
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
72%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
584 granted / 682 resolved
+30.6% vs TC avg
Minimal -13% lift
Without
With
+-13.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
5 currently pending
Career history
695
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
§103
27.8%
-12.2% vs TC avg
§102
32.1%
-7.9% vs TC avg
§112
16.9%
-23.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 682 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The following is an initial Office Action upon examination of the above-identified application on the merits. Claims 1-20 are pending in this application. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Priority Applicant’s claim for the benefit of a prior-filed application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) or under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) is acknowledged. Applicant has complied with the conditions for receiving the benefit of an earlier filing date under 35 U.S.C. 120. Information Disclosure Statement The examiner has considered the information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 1 May 2024. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 2, 5, 6, 9 and 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over KR 102321113 B1 in view of JP 2022085329 A to DEVIN et al. As per claim 1, the Korean reference discloses a facility control system, comprising: a plurality of facilities (see page 4 paragraph 6, “one or more facilities 300 and 300′”) capable of performing communication using an ultra wide band signal (see page 13 paragraph 1, “Ultra Wide Band (UWB)”); a central controller (see page 4 paragraph 10, “central control device 100”) to control some or all of the plurality of facilities (“one or more facilities 300 and 300′”); and a communication terminal (see page 7 last 2 paragraphs, “portable terminal 500”) capable of performing communication (“communication unit 140”) using the ultra wide band signal (“Ultra Wide Band (UWB)”), wherein the central controller (“central control device 100”) and a facility (“one or more facilities 300 and 300′”) as a control target (see page 25 paragraph 11, “control target”) of the central controller (“central control device 100”) are connected to each other via a communication line (“communication unit 140”), the communication terminal (“portable terminal 500”) includes: communication circuitry (“communication unit 140”) to communicate with the plurality of facilities (“one or more facilities 300 and 300′”) using the ultra wide band signal (“Ultra Wide Band (UWB)”); distance measurement circuitry (see page 20 paragraph 4, “location information module 515”) to calculate a distance (“location”) from the communication terminal (“portable terminal 500”) to the facility (“one or more facilities 300 and 300′”) as a counterpart in communication on a basis of a result of the communication by the communication circuitry (“communication unit 140”); position estimation circuitry (see page 20 paragraph 4, “Global Position System (GPS) module”) to estimate a position (“location”) of the communication terminal (“portable terminal 500”) on a basis of the distance (“location”) calculated by the distance measurement circuitry (“location information module 515”); and user information notification circuitry (see page 26 paragraph 9, “user interface”) to notify the central controller (“central control device 100”) and the facility (“one or more facilities 300 and 300′”) of user information including position information (“location”) indicating the position estimated (“location”) by the position estimation circuitry (“Global Position System (GPS) module”) and request information relating to control of the facility (“one or more facilities 300 and 300′”) and having been acquired from a user, and to cause the central controller (“central control device 100”) and the facility (“one or more facilities 300 and 300′”) to perform control in accordance with the user information notified, and the communication terminal (“portable terminal 500”) is configured to repeatedly execute calculation of the distance (“location”) by the distance measurement circuitry (“location information module 515”), estimation of the position (“location”) by the position estimation circuitry (“Global Position System (GPS) module”), and notification of the user information by the user information notification circuitry (“user interface”), and to change frequency of repeating the calculation of the distance (“location”) by the distance measurement circuitry (“location information module 515”), the estimation of the position (“location”) by the position estimation circuitry (“Global Position System (GPS) module”), and the notification of the user information by the user information notification circuitry (“user interface”) on a basis of a moving state (see page 21 paragraph 2, “motion sensor 543”) of the communication terminal (“portable terminal 500”). The Korean reference does not expressly disclose the further limitations taught by the DEVIN et al. reference, namely: to change frequency (see page 6 paragraph 1, “notification frequency”) of repeating the calculation of the distance (“geo-fence 61”) by the distance measurement circuitry (“notification unit 114”), the estimation of the position (“geo-fence 61”) by the position estimation circuitry (“notification unit 114”), and the notification of the user information (“information notified”) by the user information notification circuitry (“notification unit 114”) on a basis of a moving state of the communication terminal (“communication device 50”). Before the invention was filed, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify the portable terminal taught by the Korean reference with the notification unit taught by the DEVIN et al. reference. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to modify the portable terminal with the notification unit to reduce power consumption by reducing the frequency of transmitting such information. As per claim 2, the Korean reference discloses the user information notification circuitry (“user interface”) notifies the central controller (“central control device 100”) of the user information (“information notified”) via the facility (“one or more facilities 300 and 300′”) connected to the communication line (“communication unit 140”). As per claims 5 and 6, the Korean reference discloses the facilities (“one or more facilities 300 and 300′”) include an air conditioning device (see page 4 paragraph 8, “air conditioners, ventilation, air conditioners”) and a lighting device (“lighting”), and the central controller (“central control device 100”) designates the air conditioning device (“air conditioners, ventilation, air conditioners”) as a control target (see page 6 paragraph 3, “each control point”). As per claims 9 and 10, the Korean reference discloses the facilities (“one or more facilities 300 and 300′”) include an air conditioning device (see page 4 paragraph 8, “air conditioners, ventilation, air conditioners”) and a lighting device (“lighting”), and the central controller (“central control device 100”) designates all the air conditioning device (“air conditioners, ventilation, air conditioners”) and the lighting device (“lighting”) as control targets (see page 6 paragraph 3, “each control point”). Claim(s) 3, 4, 7 and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over KR 102321113 B1 in view of JP 2022085329 A to DEVIN et al. as applied to claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 9 and 10 above, and further in view of CN 106664211 A to HEPPERLA et al. As per claims 3 and 4, neither the Korean nor DEVIN et al. reference expressly discloses the further limitations taught by the HEPPERLA et al. reference, namely: in a case where firmware of the facility (see page 5 paragraph 6, “plurality of facility”) that is not a control target of the central controller (“supervisory controller”) differs from a latest firmware (“update firmware”), the facility (“multiple facilities”) that is not the control target of the central controller (“supervisory controller”) updates the firmware (“update firmware”) with firmware of a latest version (“update firmware”) via the communication terminal (“remote terminal”). Before the invention was filed, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify the central control device taught by the Korean reference with the remote monitor functionality of the supervising controller taught by the HEPPERLA et al. reference. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to modify the central control device with the remote monitor functionality of the supervising controller so the firmware updates may be pushed and spread to the supervising controller at multiple facilities or location by all applicable kitchen equipment to install. As per claims 7 and 8, the Korean reference discloses the facilities (“one or more facilities 300 and 300′”) include an air conditioning device (see page 4 paragraph 8, “air conditioners, ventilation, air conditioners”) and a lighting device (“lighting”), and the central controller (“central control device 100”) designates the air conditioning device (“air conditioners, ventilation, air conditioners”) as a control target (see page 6 paragraph 3, “each control point”). Claim(s) 11, 12, 15, 16, 19 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over KR 102321113 B1 in view of JP 2022085329 A to DEVIN et al. as applied to claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 9 and 10 above, and further in view of KR 20210115440 A to KUG. As per claims 11, 12, 15, 16, 19 and 20, neither the Korean nor DEVIN et al. reference expressly discloses the further limitations taught by the KUG reference, namely: a position information collection device (see page 9 last paragraph, “IoT-based terminal device”) to collect (“stored”) the position information (“GPS location information”) from the communication terminal (“mobile device 200”) and to manage the position information (“GPS location information”). Before the invention was filed, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to further modify the portable terminal taught by the Korean reference and the notification unit taught by the DEVIN et al. reference with the IoT-based terminal device taught by the KUG reference. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to further modify the portable terminal and the notification unit with the IoT-based terminal device to check accurate location information using a GPS receiver. Claim(s) 13, 14, 17 and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over KR 102321113 B1 in view of JP 2022085329 A to DEVIN et al. and further in view of CN 106664211 A to HEPPERLA et al. as applied to claims 3, 4, 7 and 8 above, and further in view of KR 20210115440 A to KUG. As per claims 13, 14, 17 and 18, neither the Korean, DEVIN et al., nor HEPPERLA et al. reference expressly discloses the further limitations taught by the KUG reference, namely: a position information collection device (see page 9 last paragraph, “IoT-based terminal device”) to collect (“stored”) the position information (“GPS location information”) from the communication terminal (“mobile device 200”) and to manage the position information (“GPS location information”). Before the invention was filed, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify the central control device taught by the Korean reference with the remote monitor functionality of the supervising controller taught by the HEPPERLA et al. reference and further with the IoT-based terminal device taught by the KUG reference. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to modify the central control device with the remote monitor functionality of the supervising controller and further with the IoT-based terminal device to check accurate location information using a GPS receiver. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The following references are cited to further show the state of the art with respect to portable facility control terminals: US 10,064,153 B2 to Yumura et al. EP 4440093 B1 to UMEDA et al. JP 7412654 B2 to UMEDA et al. JP 4989702 B2 KR 20190072842 A to BONG et al. KR 101922954 B1 to LEE et al. KR 101922224 B1 KR 100894634 B1 WO 2009034720 A1 to KOIZUMI et al. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Crystal J Barnes-Bullock whose telephone number is (571)272-3679. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8 am - 5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Fennema can be reached at 571-272-2748. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CRYSTAL J BARNES-BULLOCK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2117 11 September 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 01, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12742563
AIR CONDITIONING PREDICTIVE POWER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12717316
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EVALUATING CONFIGURATION CHANGES ON A MACHINE IN A MANUFACTURING LINE
4y 0m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12710188
ENHANCED HVAC PERFORMANCE MONITORING SYSTEM AND METHOD THEREOF
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12710186
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING AN HVAC SYSTEM TO IDENTIFY ENERGY USAGE UNDER DIFFERENT CONTROL STRATEGIES
2y 12m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12670746
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANAGING CARDON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS FOR PRODUCTS
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
72%
With Interview (-13.2%)
2y 9m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 682 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month