Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/651,956

VEHICLE SEAT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 01, 2024
Examiner
BRINDLEY, TIMOTHY J
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Toyota Boshoku Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
958 granted / 1180 resolved
+29.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
1231
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
42.2%
+2.2% vs TC avg
§102
31.0%
-9.0% vs TC avg
§112
22.7%
-17.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1180 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-9 are pending. Claims 1-9 have been examined. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3, 8 and 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kitaguchi et al. (US 8998324) (“Kitaguchi”) in view of Golen et al. (US 11634093) (“Golen”). Kitaguchi teaches a vehicle seat mounted to a vehicle, the vehicle seat comprising: a first sliding device including a first fixed rail (fig. 2: 12) configured to be fixed to the vehicle and a first movable rail (fig. 2: 13) to which a seat main body is fixed, the first movable rail being slidable relative to the first fixed rail, and the first sliding device being situated on one end side of the seat main body in seat-width directions; a second sliding device (same as first sliding device on opposing side) including a second fixed rail configured to be fixed to the vehicle and a second movable rail to which the seat main body is fixed, the second movable rail being slidable relative to the second fixed rail, and the second sliding device being situated on another end side of the seat main body in the seat-width directions; and a harness module having a harness (fig. 2: 28) and a connector (fig. 2: 24 portion attached to 25) configured to be coupled to an electrical device (fig. 2: 26) and to which the harness and the connector are fixed, the harness module being directly or indirectly fixed to the first movable rail and the second movable rail. Kitaguchi does not expressly teach wherein the harness module comprises a connector holder made of resin. However, Golen teaches a plate element (fig. 1: 102) for a harness system under a seat which is made of plastic composite (Col. 5, lines 20-35). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, to provide a resin connector holder/plate in order to provide greater support to the harness system. As concerns claim 2, Kitaguchi, as modified, teaches a plurality of fixing members disposed on the connector holder (Kitaguchi, fig. 2: portions 24 on the harness module) and configured to fix the connector holder to the first movable rail and the second movable rail; and a plurality of fixed members (Kitaguchi, fig. 2: 24 on the harness module are connected to portions 24 on the rails attached by fasteners in holes 38), to each of which corresponding one of the plurality of fixing members is mounted in a direction parallel to a sliding direction of the first movable rail and the second movable rail, wherein, on an assumption that an advancing side of the connector holder in an assembling direction is a front-end side, one of the plurality of fixing members situated closest to the front-end side is a main fixing member, fixing members among the plurality of fixing members other than the main fixing member are collectively called sub fixing members (shown in annotated figure below), one of the plurality of fixed members to which the main fixing member is mounted is a main fixed member, and fixed members among the plurality of fixed members to which the sub fixing members are mounted are sub fixed members, the main fixing member, the main fixed member, the sub fixing members and the sub fixed members are configured such that the sub fixing members and the sub fixed members come in contact with each other after the main fixing member and the main fixed member come in contact with each other when the plurality of fixing members are mounted to the plurality of fixed members respectively (the order of assembly of the main fixed and sub fixed members is considered a product-by-process limitation which is given little patentable weight, as only the end result/product of the process is required to be taught). PNG media_image1.png 806 622 media_image1.png Greyscale As concerns claim 3, Kitaguchi, as modified, teaches a bridge (Kitaguchi, fig. 2: 19) extending in the seat-width directions and coupling and bridging the first movable rail and the second movable rail, wherein the main fixed member is disposed on the bridge, and wherein at least one of the sub fixed members is disposed on a bracket that is fixed to at least one of the first movable rail or the second movable rail (as shown above). As concerns claim 8, Kitaguchi, as modified, teaches wherein at least one of the plurality of fixing members is mounted to the at least one of the sub fixed members disposed on the bracket to hold the at least one of the sub fixed members disposed on the bracket from the up-down directions (Kitaguchi, fig. 2 above shows the sub fixed members which mate with 24 on the harness module disposed on brackets attached into holes 38). As concerns claim 9, Kitaguchi teaches a vehicle seat mounted to a vehicle, the vehicle seat comprising: a first sliding device including a first fixed rail (fig. 2: 12) configured to be fixed to the vehicle and a first movable rail (fig. 2: 13) to which a seat main body is fixed, the first movable rail being slidable relative to the first fixed rail, and the first sliding device being situated on one end side of the seat main body in seat-width directions; a second sliding device (same as first sliding device on opposing side) including a second fixed rail configured to be fixed to the vehicle and a second movable rail to which the seat main body is fixed, the second movable rail being slidable relative to the second fixed rail, and the second sliding device being situated on another end side of the seat main body in the seat-width directions; and a harness module having a harness (fig. 2: 28) and a connector (fig. 2: 24 portion attached to 25) configured to be coupled to an electrical device (fig. 2: 26) and to which the harness and the connector are fixed, the harness module being directly or indirectly fixed to the first movable rail and the second movable rail. Kitaguchi does not expressly teach wherein the harness module comprises a connector holder made of resin. However, Golen teaches a plate element (fig. 1: 102) for a harness system under a seat which is made of plastic composite (Col. 5, lines 20-35). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the invention, to provide a resin connector holder/plate in order to provide greater support to the harness system. Further, Kitaguchi, as modified, teaches a plurality of fixing members disposed on the connector holder (Kitaguchi, fig. 2: portions 24 on the harness module) and configured to fix the connector holder to the first movable rail and the second movable rail; and a plurality of fixed members (Kitaguchi, fig. 2: 24 on the harness module are connected to portions 24 on the rails attached by fasteners in holes 38), to each of which corresponding one of the plurality of fixing members is mounted in a direction parallel to a sliding direction of the first movable rail and the second movable rail, wherein, on an assumption that an advancing side of the connector holder in an assembling direction is a front-end side, one of the plurality of fixing members situated closest to the front-end side is a main fixing member, fixing members among the plurality of fixing members other than the main fixing member are collectively called sub fixing members (shown in annotated figure below), one of the plurality of fixed members to which the main fixing member is mounted is a main fixed member, and fixed members among the plurality of fixed members to which the sub fixing members are mounted are sub fixed members, the main fixing member, the main fixed member, the sub fixing members and the sub fixed members are configured such that the sub fixing members and the sub fixed members come in contact with each other after the main fixing member and the main fixed member come in contact with each other when the plurality of fixing members are mounted to the plurality of fixed members respectively (the main fixing member in the middle/bridge may be attached before the sub fixing members along the sides/rails). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art references of Kitaguchi and Golen fail to teach wherein the bracket includes a wall-shaped restriction member that restricts displacement of the connector holder over a given dimension in the seat-width directions, wherein a portion of the connector holder facing the restriction member includes a wall-shaped opposing wall that is slidably contactable with the restriction member, and wherein a dimension of a portion of the opposing wall parallel to the assembling direction is greater than a dimension of a portion of the restriction member parallel to the assembling direction; or wherein at least one of the sub fixed members is disposed on the bridge, and wherein at least one of the plurality of fixing members is mounted to the at least one of the sub fixed members disposed on the bridge to hold the at least one of the sub fixed members disposed on the bridge from the up-down directions. Further, there is no teaching, suggestion or motivation to modify the prior art absent hindsight. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TIMOTHY J BRINDLEY whose telephone number is (571)270-7231. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri, 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Dunn can be reached at 5712726670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TIMOTHY J BRINDLEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3636
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 01, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 06, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600478
RECLINING SEAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600277
BACKREST FOR A VEHICLE SEAT AND A METHOD FOR MOUNTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595060
SEAT ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588766
SEAT COMPRISING A FRAME AND A COVER, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583366
VEHICLE SEAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+3.9%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1180 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month