Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/651,982

STATOR FOR ROTATING ELECTRIC MACHINE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 01, 2024
Examiner
MOK, ALEX W
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Kabushiki Kaisha Toyota Jidoshokki
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
827 granted / 1114 resolved
+6.2% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
1158
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
63.6%
+23.6% vs TC avg
§102
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
§112
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1114 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Suzuki et al. (Japanese Patent Document No.: JP 2019030156 A, hereinafter Suzuki '156). For claim 1, Suzuki '156 discloses the claimed invention comprising: a stator core (reference numeral 21) including a cylindrical yoke (reference numeral 22) and multiple teeth (reference numeral 23) extending from an inner circumferential surface of the yoke (see figures 1, 2), the stator core (reference numeral 21) including slots (reference numeral 25) each located between adjacent ones of the teeth (reference numeral 23) in a circumferential direction of the yoke (see figures 1, 2); multiple coils (reference numeral 24, see figures 1, 2), each coil (reference numeral 24) being formed by a winding (reference numeral 24a) that is wound in a concentrated manner around the corresponding one of the teeth (reference numeral 23) while passing through the corresponding slots (reference numeral 25, see figure 2); and a thermistor (reference numeral 50) configured to measure a temperature of the coils (see figure 2), wherein a pillar-shaped insulating member (reference numeral 40) is disposed in each slot (see figures 1, 2), the insulating member (reference numeral 40) being located between the coils (reference numeral 24) that are adjacent to each other in the circumferential direction in the slot (see figures 1, 2), at least one of the insulating members (reference numeral 40) includes a thermistor insertion hole (reference numeral 52) that opens in an end face at an end in a lengthwise direction of the insulating member (see figures 2, 4, 5), and the thermistor (reference numeral 50) is held by the corresponding insulating member (reference numeral 40) in a state of being inserted in the thermistor insertion hole (reference numeral 52, see figure 2). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Suzuki ‘156 as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Oota et al. (US Patent No.: 8257064). For claim 2, Suzuki '156 discloses the claimed invention except for a space between the thermistor and an inner surface of the insulating member that defines the thermistor insertion hole being filled with a plastic. Having the insulating member filled with plastic would merely involve filling the slot component with a plastic material which is a known skill in the art as exhibited by Oota et al. (reference numeral 56, see figure 4), which when applied to the slot of Suzuki '156 would disclose a space between the thermistor and an inner surface of the insulating member that defines the thermistor insertion hole being filled with a plastic. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the plastic as disclosed by Oota et al. for filling the space between the thermistor and insulating member of Suzuki '156 for predictably providing desirable configuration for facilitating proper assembly of the components within the device. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3 and 4 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 5 is also objected to for being dependent upon aforementioned claim 4. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: While the prior art disclose some of the claimed invention as explained above in the present action, the prior art of record does not sufficiently disclose the combination of features including the thermistor including: a sensor unit configured to measure the temperature of the corresponding coil; and a lead wire extending from the sensor unit, the insulating member that includes the thermistor insertion hole includes a hole bottom surface that faces in a direction opposite to an insertion direction of the thermistor into the thermistor insertion hole, and the sensor unit is configured to protrude from the end face of the insulating member by a predetermined length when the sensor unit is inserted in the thermistor insertion hole and brought into contact with the hole bottom surface as recited in claim 3; and wherein each tooth includes: a tooth extension extending from the inner circumferential surface of the yoke; and two flanges projecting from a distal end of the tooth extension toward opposite sides in the circumferential direction of the yoke, the insulating members each include a supported surface that extends over a slot opening, the slot opening being a gap between ones of the flanges adjacent to each other in the circumferential direction, the supported surface being supported by both of the flanges that are adjacent to each other in the circumferential direction, the supported surface includes a recess that is open toward the slot opening, the recess of the insulating member that includes the thermistor insertion hole is continuous with the thermistor insertion hole, and the recesses are filled with a plastic that has a higher thermal conductivity than the insulating members as recited in claim 4. Claim 5 is dependent upon claim 4. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The following references disclose embodiments of slot insulating members: US 6081056 A (Takagi; Kunihiko et al.), US 4926077 A (Gauthier; Raymond G. et al.), US 4246505 A (Yasaka; Yasuhiro et al.), US 20250067261 A1 (ISOBE; Keisuke et al.), US 20230208231 A1 (SUZUKI; Yudai et al.), US 20220154724 A1 (MORI; Hidefumi et al.), US 20210050762 A1 (TSUCHIDA; Kazuchika et al.), US 20200235616 A1 (SUZUKI; Noriyuki et al.), US 20170054346 A1 (MATSUMOTO; Takashi), JP 2022112344 A (HASEGAWA MASAHIRO), JP 2019030158 A (SUZUKI MAREYUKI et al.). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEX W MOK whose telephone number is (571)272-9084. The examiner can normally be reached 8am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Seye Iwarere can be reached at (571) 270-5112. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEX W MOK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 01, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603533
ROTOR ASSEMBLY FOR AN ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603532
ELECTRIC MOTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597815
ROTOR FOR A ROTARY ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592625
PERMANENT MAGNET ARRANGEMENT OF A SHUTTLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592623
ROTOR STRUCTURE OF ROTARY ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+21.2%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1114 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month