Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/652,016

VIBRATING DEVICE AND IMAGING DEVICE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
May 01, 2024
Priority
Nov 26, 2021 — JP 2021-192472 +1 more
Examiner
WU, ZHENZHEN
Art Unit
2637
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
302 granted / 381 resolved
+17.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
393
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
83.3%
+43.3% vs TC avg
§102
9.9%
-30.1% vs TC avg
§112
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 381 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments In view of the amendment to claims 1 and 8, and cancellation of claims 6-7 and 16-17, the rejection of claims 1-20 has been withdrawn. Applicant's arguments filed on 12/31/2025, with respect to newly added claim 22 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Please refer to rejection below for details. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Fujimoto et al. (US 2020/0055087 A1). As to claim 22, Fujimoto et al. discloses a vibrating device (Figs. 1-3: vibration device 1) comprising: a light transmitting body (Figs.1-3: light transmission body 2); a vibrating body (Figs.1-3: cylindrical body 3) with a tubular structure including a first end portion (Figs.1-3: first end portion 3a), a second end portion (Figs.1-3: second end portion 3b), and a side wall joining the first and second end portions (Figs.1-3: cylindrical body main body 3d corresponds to the claimed side wall. As shown in Figs.1-3, the cylindrical body main body 3d is connecting the first end portion 3a and the second end portion 3b), the vibrating body being connected to the light transmitting body at the first end portion to vibrate the light transmitting body ([0048]: “The first end portion 3a is coupled with the light transmission body 2”); and an extending portion (Figs.1-3: ring-shaped flange portion 3e) extending outward from the side wall of the vibrating body ([0050]: “A ring-shaped flange portion 3e extending outward in the radial direction is provided on the second end portion 3b side of the cylindrical body 3”); a piezoelectric element (Figs.1-3: ring-shaped piezoelectric element 4) at the second end portion of the vibrating body (As shown in Figs. 2 and 3); wherein a thickness of the extending portion is equal to or greater than about 0.25 mm and equal to or less than about 1 mm ([0068]: “The thickness of the ring-shaped flange portion 3e is set to about 1.00 mm”). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-5, 8-15 and 18-21 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The reasons for allowance of the claims 1-5, 8-15 and 18-21 are clear from the written record of prosecution. Attention is specifically drawn to the amendments and arguments dated 12/31/2025. As such, the reasons for allowance have been fully addressed and complied according to MPEP 1302.14(I). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Fujimoto et al. (US 2020/0213495 A1) discloses a vibrating device includes a dome-shaped cover, a cylindrical or substantially cylindrical vibrating body, and a piezoelectric element. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZHENZHEN WU whose telephone number is (571)272-2519. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30 am - 5:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, SINH TRAN can be reached at (571)272-7564. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZHENZHEN WU/Examiner, Art Unit 2637 /SINH TRAN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2637
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 01, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Dec 31, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 01, 2026
Interview Requested
May 07, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 07, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641350
DETECTION DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12634570
CAMERA MODULE
4y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12621547
VISUALIZATION DEVICE AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12604106
Camera Assembly and Electronic Device
2y 10m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12587756
IMAGING DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS
2y 12m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+13.6%)
2y 3m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 381 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month