Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/652,018

OPTICAL MODULE AND OPTICAL DEVICE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
May 01, 2024
Priority
Nov 30, 2021 — JP 2021-194449 +1 more
Examiner
BOURQUINE, MACKENZI TATE
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
67 granted / 85 resolved
+10.8% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
120
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
55.6%
+15.6% vs TC avg
§102
26.5%
-13.5% vs TC avg
§112
17.2%
-22.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 85 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The amendments filed on 6/18/2026 are acknowledged and accepted. Claims 1-20 remain pending in the application. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Drawings The drawings filed on 05/01/2024 are acknowledged and accepted. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tonar (US20120243093A1, of record). PNG media_image1.png 511 734 media_image1.png Greyscale With respect to Claim 1, Tonar discloses an optical module (Fig. 8B—element 8A, vibratory assembly; [0084]) comprising: a translucent portion (Fig. 8B—element 20A, lens cover; [0084]); a vibrator (Fig. 8B—element 16A, piezoelectric transducer; [0084]) with a tubular shape (See Fig. 8A and 8B-- element 16A is cylindrical and supports element 20A) and supporting the translucent portion (Fig. 8B—element 20A, lens cover; [0084]); a piezoelectric element (Fig. 8B and [0084]: Element 16A contains a piezoelectric transducer) located at the vibrator (Fig. 8B—element 16A, piezoelectric transducer; [0084]) to vibrate the vibrator ([0004]: The piezoelectric transducer is adapted to vibrate upon actuation of the power source); and an inner-layer optical component (Fig. 8B—element 38A, light sensor device lens, and inner surface of 14A, housing; [0084]) located at an inner side portion of the vibrator (Fig. 8B—element 38A is located inside the vibratory assembly below element 16A); wherein a recess (Fig. 8B— inner surface of element 20A) that is recessed in a thickness direction of the translucent portion (Fig. 8B—element 20A, lens cover; [0084]) and includes a curvature at a surface (Fig. 8A—the inner surface of element 20A is concave) of the translucent portion (Fig. 8B—element 20A, lens cover; [0084]) facing the inner-layer optical component (Fig. 8B—element 38A, light sensor device lens, and inner surface of 14A, housing; [0084]); the inner-layer optical component (Fig. 8B—element 38A, light sensor device lens, and inner surface of 14A, housing; [0084]) includes an inner-layer lens (Fig. 8B— lens including top surface of element 38A) that faces the translucent portion (Fig. 8B—element 20A, lens cover; [0084]); the inner-layer lens (Fig. 8B— lens including top surface of element 38A) includes a first portion (Fig. 8B— convex top surface of element 38A) that protrudes toward the translucent portion (Fig. 8B—element 20A, lens cover; [0084]) and includes a curvature and a second portion (Fig. 8B— flat periphery top surface of element 38A) at an outer periphery of the first portion (Fig. 8B— convex top surface of element 38A); PNG media_image2.png 394 977 media_image2.png Greyscale a first gap (See annotated excerpt of Fig. 8B— G1, space between convex top surface of element 38A and inner surface of element 20A) is located between the first portion (Fig. 8B— convex top surface of element 38A) and the translucent portion (Fig. 8B—element 20A, lens cover; [0084]) in the outer periphery of the first portion (Fig. 8B— convex top surface of element 38A); a second gap (See annotated Fig. 8B— G2, space between flat periphery surface of element 38A and inner surface of element 20A) is located between the second portion (Fig. 8B— flat periphery top surface of element 38A) and the translucent portion (Fig. 8B—element 20A, lens cover; [0084]); and the second gap (See annotated Fig. 8B— G2, space between flat periphery surface of element 38A and inner surface of element 20A) is larger (Fig. 8B— space between flat periphery surface of element 38A and inner surface of element 20A is larger than the space between convex top surface of element 38A and inner surface of element 20A) than the first gap (See annotated excerpt of Fig. 8B— G1, space between convex top surface of element 38A and inner surface of element 20A). With respect to Claim 2, Tonar discloses the optical module according to Claim 1, and further discloses wherein the second portion (Fig. 8B— flat periphery top surface of element 38A) includes a step (See annotated Fig. 8B-- step) that is recessed in a direction separated farther from the translucent portion (Fig. 8B—element 20A, lens cover; [0084]) than the first portion (Fig. 8B— convex top surface of element 38A). With respect to Claim 3, Tonar discloses the optical module according to Claim 1, and further discloses wherein the second portion (Fig. 8B— flat periphery top surface of element 38A) includes an inclination surface (See annotated Fig. 8B-- inclination surface) that is inclined in a direction extending away from the translucent portion (Fig. 8B—element 20A, lens cover; [0084]) toward an outer periphery of the inner-layer lens (Fig. 8B— lens including top surface of element 38A). With respect to Claim 4, Tonar discloses the optical module according to Claim 1, and further discloses wherein a size of the second gap (See annotated Fig. 8B— G2, space between flat periphery surface of element 38A and inner surface of element 20A) is about 1.2 times or more (See annotated excerpt of Fig. 8B—G2 is about than 1.2 times larger than G1) than the first gap (See annotated excerpt of Fig. 8B— G1, space between convex top surface of element 38A and inner surface of element 20A). With respect to Claim 5, Tonar discloses the optical module according to Claim 1, and further discloses wherein when viewed from the thickness direction of the translucent portion (Fig. 8B—element 20A, lens cover; [0084]), an outer diameter of the inner-layer lens (Fig. 8B— lens including top surface of element 38A) is larger than an outer diameter of the recess (Fig. 8B— inner surface of element 20A) of the translucent portion (Fig. 8B—element 20A, lens cover; [0084]) (Fig. 8A—the outer diameter of 38A is larger than the outer diameter of the inner surface of element 20A). With respect to Claim 6, Tonar discloses the optical module according to Claim 1, and further discloses wherein the curvature of the first portion (Fig. 8B— convex top surface of element 38A) of the inner-layer lens (Fig. 8B— lens including top surface of element 38A) is larger ([0084]: he curvature of the viewing pane 60 A of the lens cover 20 A includes a smaller radius than the curvature of the light sensor device lens 38 A) than the curvature of the recess (Fig. 8B— inner surface of element 20A) of the translucent portion (Fig. 8B—element 20A, lens cover; [0084]). With respect to Claim 7, Tonar discloses the optical module according to Claim 1, and further discloses wherein the second portion (Fig. 8B— flat periphery top surface of element 38A) includes a flat surface (See annotated Fig. 8B-- flat surface) perpendicular to a thickness direction of the inner-layer lens (Fig. 8B— lens including top surface of element 38A) ; the inner-layer optical component (Fig. 8B—element 38A, light sensor device lens, and inner surface of 14A, housing; [0084]) includes a lens holding portion that has a tubular shape (Fig. 8B-- element 14A is tubular and inner surface holds element 38A) and accommodates the inner-layer lens (Fig. 8B— lens including top surface of element 38A) ; and the lens holding portion (Fig. 8B-- element 14A is tubular and inner surface holds element 38A) includes a pressing portion (See annotated Fig. 8B-- pressing portion) that is in contact with the flat surface (See annotated Fig. 8B-- flat surface) at an inner side portion of the lens holding portion. With respect to Claim 8, Tonar discloses the optical module according to Claim 1, and further discloses wherein the first portion (Fig. 8B— convex top surface of element 38A) is in (Fig. 8B— convex top surface of element 38A is accommodated by the inner surface of element 20A) the recess (Fig. 8B— inner surface of element 20A) of the translucent portion (Fig. 8B—element 20A, lens cover; [0084]). With respect to Claim 9, Tonar discloses the optical module according to Claim 1, and further discloses wherein the inner-layer lens (Fig. 8B— lens including top surface of element 38A) is a spherical lens or an aspherical lens (Fig. 8B— lens including top surface of element 38A is aspheric). With respect to Claim 10, Tonar discloses the optical module according to Claim 1, and further discloses wherein the recess (Fig. 8B— inner surface of element 20A) of the translucent portion (Fig. 8B—element 20A, lens cover; [0084]) is recessed in a hemispherical or substantially hemispherical shape (Fig. 8B—element 20A is recessed in a substantially hemispherical shape). With respect to Claim 11, Tonar discloses an optical device (Fig. 9- piezoelectric system) comprising: the optical module (Fig. 8B—element 8A, vibratory assembly; [0084]) according to Claim 1; and an optical element (Fig. 8A—element 12A, light sensor device; [0081]) at the optical module (Fig. 8B—element 8A, vibratory assembly; [0084]). With respect to Claim 12, Tonar discloses the optical device according to Claim 11, and further discloses wherein the second portion (Fig. 8B— flat periphery top surface of element 38A) includes a step (See annotated Fig. 8B-- step) that is recessed in a direction separated farther from the translucent portion (Fig. 8B—element 20A, lens cover; [0084]) than the first portion (Fig. 8B— convex top surface of element 38A). With respect to Claim 13, Tonar discloses the optical device according to Claim 11, and further discloses wherein the second portion (Fig. 8B— flat periphery top surface of element 38A) includes an inclination surface (See annotated Fig. 8B-- inclination surface) that is inclined in a direction extending away from the translucent portion (Fig. 8B—element 20A, lens cover; [0084]) toward an outer periphery of the inner-layer lens (Fig. 8B— lens including top surface of element 38A). With respect to Claim 14, Tonar discloses the optical device according to Claim 11, and further discloses wherein a size of the second gap (See annotated Fig. 8B— G2, space between flat periphery surface of element 38A and inner surface of element 20A) is about 1.2 times or more (See annotated excerpt of Fig. 8B—G2 is about than 1.2 times larger than G1) than the first gap (See annotated excerpt of Fig. 8B— G1, space between convex top surface of element 38A and inner surface of element 20A). With respect to Claim 15, Tonar discloses the optical device according to Claim 11, and further discloses wherein when viewed from the thickness direction of the translucent portion (Fig. 8B—element 20A, lens cover; [0084]), an outer diameter of the inner-layer lens (Fig. 8B— lens including top surface of element 38A) is larger than an outer diameter of the recess (Fig. 8B— inner surface of element 20A) of the translucent portion (Fig. 8B—element 20A, lens cover; [0084]) (Fig. 8A—the outer diameter of 38A is larger than the outer diameter of the inner surface of element 20A). With respect to Claim 16, Tonar discloses the optical device according to Claim 11, and further discloses wherein the curvature of the first portion (Fig. 8B— convex top surface of element 38A) of the inner-layer lens (Fig. 8B— lens including top surface of element 38A) is larger ([0084]: he curvature of the viewing pane 60 A of the lens cover 20 A includes a smaller radius than the curvature of the light sensor device lens 38 A) than the curvature of the recess (Fig. 8B— inner surface of element 20A) of the translucent portion (Fig. 8B—element 20A, lens cover; [0084]). With respect to Claim 17, Tonar discloses the optical device according to Claim 11, and further wherein the second portion (Fig. 8B— flat periphery top surface of element 38A) includes a flat surface (See annotated Fig. 8B-- flat surface) perpendicular to a thickness direction of the inner-layer lens (Fig. 8B— lens including top surface of element 38A); the inner-layer optical component (Fig. 8B—element 38A, light sensor device lens, and inner surface of 14A, housing; [0084]) includes a lens holding portion that has a tubular shape (Fig. 8B-- element 14A is tubular and inner surface holds element 38A) and accommodates the inner-layer lens (Fig. 8B— lens including top surface of element 38A); and the lens holding portion (Fig. 8B-- element 14A is tubular and inner surface holds element 38A) includes a pressing portion (See annotated Fig. 8B-- pressing portion) that is in contact with the flat surface (See annotated Fig. 8B-- flat surface) at an inner side portion of the lens holding portion. With respect to Claim 18, Tonar discloses the optical device according to Claim 11, and further wherein the first portion (Fig. 8B— convex top surface of element 38A) is in (Fig. 8B— convex top surface of element 38A is accommodated by the inner surface of element 20A) the recess (Fig. 8B— inner surface of element 20A) of the translucent portion (Fig. 8B—element 20A, lens cover; [0084]). With respect to Claim 19, Tonar discloses the optical device according to Claim 11, and further discloses wherein the inner-layer lens (Fig. 8B— lens including top surface of element 38A) is a spherical lens or an aspherical lens (Fig. 8B— lens including top surface of element 38A is aspheric). With respect to Claim 20, Tonar discloses the optical device according to Claim 11, and further discloses wherein the recess (Fig. 8B— inner surface of element 20A) of the translucent portion (Fig. 8B—element 20A, lens cover; [0084]) is recessed in a hemispherical or substantially hemispherical shape (Fig. 8B—element 20A is recessed in a substantially hemispherical shape). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 6/18/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Examiner disagrees with Applicant’s argument that G2 of Tonar is smaller than G1 of Tonar. Examiner has provided a supplementary image, annotated excerpt of Fig. 8A above, in order to provide a clearer definition of the first and second gap. As seen in the annotated excerpt of Fig. 8A, G2 is approximately 0.3 inches larger than G1. G1 is measured between a peripheral portion of the rounded section of element 38A and element 20A. G2 is measured between the flat flange portion of element 38A and element 20A. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MACKENZI BOURQUINE whose telephone number is (571)272-5956. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:30 - 4:30 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Pinping Sun can be reached at (571) 270-1284. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MACKENZI BOURQUINE/ Examiner, Art Unit 2872 /WILLIAM R ALEXANDER/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 01, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 18, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 04, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740845
OPHTHALMIC VIEWING DEVICES
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12736717
A DEVICE AND A METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A DEVICE, SUCH AS A LIQUID LENS, WITH BOND CONFIGURED TO FRACTURE AT THE SAME BURST PRESSURE
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12717116
Lens Module and Electronic Device
4y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12704737
COLOR NEUTRAL EMISSIVE DISPLAY WITH NOTCHED REFLECTIVE POLARIZER
4y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702290
INTEGRATED APPARATUS FOR VISUAL FUNCTION TESTING AND METHOD THEREOF
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+15.5%)
3y 3m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 85 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month