Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/653,108

ESCUTCHEON MODULES FOR CIRCUIT BREAKERS

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
May 02, 2024
Examiner
SAEED, AHMED M
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Schneider Electric SE
OA Round
2 (Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
607 granted / 751 resolved
+12.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
771
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
50.9%
+10.9% vs TC avg
§102
42.3%
+2.3% vs TC avg
§112
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 751 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 Claim 21 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Reynolds (US20190267790). Regarding claim 21, Reynolds teaches a circuit breaker comprising:a breaker housing; a mechanical switch (122, 124) operatively connected to an overcurrent disconnect mechanism 100 configured to break a circuit undergoing an overvoltage state (paragraph 76); an escutcheon module 200 including an escutcheon body, the escutcheon body including a test or reset button 226 configured to mechanically interface with a test or reset mechanism 124 of the mechanical switch (paragraph 69); and an escutcheon connector (212, 210) on an outward switch face of the breaker housing including attachment points (118, 120) configured to engage the escutcheon module (paragraph 71). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claims 1-4, 8-15 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Reynolds (US20190267790) in view of Montjean (US. Pat.6,628,496). Regarding claim 1, Reynolds teaches an escutcheon module for a circuit breaker comprising: an escutcheon body 202 configured to seat against a switch face 114 of a circuit breaker 100 wherein one or more attachments (210, 212) of the escutcheon body are configured to engage with one or more attachment points (118, 120) of the circuit breaker (Fig. 7 and paragraph 71), wherein the escutcheon body includes a printed circuit board assembly (PCBA) 236 having an input/output interface 252 configured to receive input from an external device 300 (Figs. 1-9 and paragraphs 81-83). Reynolds does not teach the input/output interface configured to receive input from an external device to control the circuit breaker. the input/output interface 16 configured to receive input (the processor 2 receives/input reference values through remote communication) from an external device 17 to control the circuit breaker (the process issues open/break instruction signals to the circuit breakers 13-15 based on the programmed refence values (col. 2, lines 20-35). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize the teachings of Montjean to remotely control the circuit breaker. Regarding claim 2, Reynolds teaches the escutcheon module wherein the escutcheon body 200 includes a clearance area configured to allow a switch 122 of the circuit breaker 100 to be accessible and functional with the escutcheon body engaged to the circuit breaker (Figs. 7-8). Regarding claim 8, Reynolds teaches the escutcheon module wherein the escutcheon body is dimensioned and configured to engage a circuit breaker that is a miniature circuit breaker (MCB) (Figs. 5-6). Regarding claim 9, Reynolds teaches a circuit breaker system comprising:a circuit breaker including: a breaker housing 100; a mechanical switch 122 operatively connected to an overcurrent disconnect mechanism configured to break a circuit undergoing an overvoltage state; and an escutcheon connector (210, 212) on an outward switch face 114 of the breaker housing including attachment points 118 configured to engage an interchangeable escutcheon module 200 (Figs. 2, Figs. 7-8), wherein the interchangeable escutcheon body includes a printed circuit board assembly (PCBA) 236 having an input/output interface 252 configured to receive input from an external device 300 (Figs. 1-9 and paragraphs 81-83), as required by claim 9; wherein the PCBA 236 includes the input/output interface configured to connect the external device and the escutcheon body engaged to the circuit breaker, wherein the PCBA 236 includes an input/output interface configured for connecting with the external device by at least one of: a USB connection; a Bluetooth connection; or a Wi-Fi connection (paragraph 81), as required by claim 4 and 15. Reynolds does not teach the input/output interface configured to receive input from an external device to control the circuit breaker. the input/output interface 16 configured to receive input (the processor 2 receives/input reference values through remote communication) from an external device 17 to control the circuit breaker (the process issues open/break instruction signals to the circuit breakers 13-15 based on the programmed refence values, see col. 2, lines 20-35), as required by claim 9; wherein the PCBA 236 includes the input/output interface 16 configured to connect the external device to as required by claims 4 and 15. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize the teachings of Montjean to remotely control the circuit breaker. Regarding claim 3, Reynolds teaches the module wherein the PCBA includes an electrical interface (346, 126) configured for connecting to circuit components of the circuit breaker with the escutcheon body engaged to the circuit breaker (paragraph 70-75). Regarding claim 10, Reynolds teaches the system further comprising the interchangeable escutcheon module 200 engaged to the escutcheon connector (212, 210) (see Figs. 1-6) Regarding claim 11, Reynolds teaches a circuit breaker system wherein the interchangeable escutcheon module 200 is of a different color than the breaker housing (the LED 239 of the module emits different lights, see paragraph 85). Regarding claim 12, Reynolds teaches a circuit breaker system wherein the interchangeable escutcheon module 200 includes an escutcheon body 200 configured to seat against the outward switch face of a circuit breaker 100 wherein attachments (210, 212) of the escutcheon body are engaged with the attachment points (118, 120) of the breaker housing (paragraph 71), and wherein the escutcheon body includes a clearance area configured to allow a switch 122 of the circuit breaker to be accessible and functional with the escutcheon body engaged to the breaker housing (Fig. 7). Regarding claim 13, Reynolds teaches the system wherein the interchangeable escutcheon module includes escutcheon body 200 and the escutcheon body includes a test or reset button 226 configured to mechanically interface with a test or reset mechanism of the mechanical switch 122 (Figs. 6-7 and paragraphs 67-69). Regarding claim 14, Reynolds teaches the circuit breaker further comprising a second PCBA 130 assembled in the breaker housing 100, wherein the second PCBA includes an electrical interface (126, 127) configured for connecting to circuit components of the circuit breaker with the escutcheon body 200 engaged to the circuit breaker (paragraph 81). Regarding claim 20, Reynolds teaches the system wherein the circuit breaker is configured for at least one of single phase, single pole (1P), single phase double pole (2P), single phase three pole (3P), ground fault (GF), arc fault (AF), and/or combined ground fault and arc fault (DF) operation (paragraph 76). Claims 5 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Reynolds and Montjean as applied to claims 1 and 9 above, and further in view of (KR20210135105). Regarding claim 5 and 16, Reynolds does not teach the escutcheon body 200 includes a display. However, 105’ teaches a escutcheon module wherein the escutcheon body 200 includes a display 250 configured to connect to circuitry of the circuit breaker to display information regarding the circuit breaker with the escutcheon module engaged to the circuit breaker (the connector 216 of the escutcheon body connects to the connector 116 of the breaker, which connects the display to the break, see Figs. 1-7). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize the teachings of 105’ to provide a notification to the user which displays the status of the circuit breaker. Claims 7 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Reynolds and Montjean as applied to claims 1 and 9 above, and further in view of Maloney (US. Pat. 5,909,019). Regarding claims 7 and 18, Reynolds does not teach the escutcheon body including at least one receptacle for a physical lock positioned to lock a switch of the circuit breaker. However, Maloney teaches an escutcheon body wherein the escutcheon body includes at least one receptacle 30 for a physical lock positioned to lock a switch 60 of the circuit breaker (Fig. 7). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize the teachings of Maloney to prevent unauthorize operation of the circuit breaker. Claims 6 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Reynolds and Montjean as applied to claims 1 and 9 above, and further in view of Gerstner (US20230326699). Regarding claims 6 and 17, Reynolds does not teach the display to have a touch screen. However, Gerstner teaches the escutcheon body with display (DISP) that includes a touch screen for user interaction with the circuit breaker LS1 (Fig. 1 and paragraph 70). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize the teachings of Gerstner in the circuit breaker of Reynolds to provide a touch screen feature for user to interact with the circuit breaker. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AHMED M SAEED whose telephone number is (571)270-7976. The examiner can normally be reached 10-8pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee Luebke can be reached at 571-272-2009. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AHMED M SAEED/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 02, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 31, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jun 25, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 03, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749633
DEVICE FOR LIMITING MOVEMENT OF MOVABLE PART IN ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12738429
CURVED-SURFACE BUTTON STRUCTURE
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736710
OBSTRUCTION DETECTING APPARATUS, OBSTRUCTION DETECTING SYSTEM, ELECTRIC LIFTING DESK, AND ELECTRIC LIFTING CUPBOARD
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738433
KEYBOARD DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738432
SWITCH DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+13.1%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 751 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month