CTNF 18/653,130 CTNF 81254 DETAILED ACTION General Remarks 07-03-aia AIA 15-10-aia The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. 07-06 AIA 15-10-15 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. When responding to this office action, applicants are advised to provide the examiner with line numbers and page numbers in the application and/or references cited to assist the examiner in locating appropriate paragraphs. Per MPEP 2111 and 2111.01, the claims are given their broadest reasonable interpretation and the words of the claims are given their plain meaning consistent with the specification without importing claim limitations from the specification. For Examiner’s Interview fill out the online Automated Interview Request (AIR) form (http://www.uspto.gov/patent/uspto-automated-interview-request-air-form.html). Status of claim(s) to be treated in this office action: Independent: 1 and 15. Pending: 1-20. Information Disclosure Statement Applicant’s IDS(s) submitted on 5/2/2024 is/are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement has/have considered by the examiner and made of record. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: 06-11 AIA The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. 06-11-01 AIA The following title is suggested: DISPLAY AND LIGHT SENSING PANEL WITH VERTICALLY STACKED RGB PIXEL CIRCUITS . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 07-20-aia AIA The following is a quotation of AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-4, 8-13, 15-16, 19 and 20 is/are rejected under AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee US PG pub. 20140292622 A1; in view of Ke et al., US PG pub. 20190319080 A1. Re: Independent Claim 1, Lee discloses a substrate (101, fig. 9), a plurality of unit pixels (10a and 10b, fig. 1) arranged repeatedly along a direction parallel to a major surface of the substrate (101, fig. 9), and a plurality of unit pixel circuits (fig. 6-8) including a unit pixel circuit (fig. 7-8) that is repeatedly arranged along the direction parallel to the major surface of the substrate (101, fig. 9) and electrically connected to a corresponding unit pixel among the plurality of unit pixels (10a and 10b, fig. 1), wherein each unit pixel includes: a red sub-pixel (12, fig. 2) including a red optoelectronic element (120R, OLED_R, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081) configured to display red color or detect light in a red wavelength spectrum, a green sub-pixel (14, fig. 2) including a green optoelectronic element (120G, OLED_G, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081) configured to display green color or detect light in a green wavelength spectrum, and a blue sub-pixel (16, fig. 2) including a blue optoelectronic element (120B, OLED_B, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081) configured to display blue color or detect light in a blue wavelength spectrum, wherein each unit pixel circuit (fig. 7-8) includes: a red pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) electrically connected to the red optoelectronic element (120R, OLED_R, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), a green pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) electrically connected to the green optoelectronic element (120G, OLED_G, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), and a blue pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) electrically connected to the blue optoelectronic element (120B, OLED_B, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), and wherein the red pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9), the green pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9), and the blue pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9). Lee is silent regarding: red, green, and blue pixel circuits are stacked each other along a thickness direction of the substrate (101, fig. 9). Ke discloses optoelectronic elements (140a-140c, fig. 2H) electrically connect to pixel circuits (120a-120c, fig. 2H) are stacked each other along a thickness direction of the substrate (104, fig. 2H). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include a vertical stacked pixel circuit since stacking the pixel circuits can improve LED high-density integration. Re: Claim 2, Lee and Ke discloses all the limitations of claim 1 on which this claim depends. Lee further discloses: the red optoelectronic element (120R, OLED_R, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), the green optoelectronic element (120G, OLED_G, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), and the blue optoelectronic element (120B, OLED_B, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081) are arranged side by side along the direction parallel to the major surface of the substrate (101, fig. 9). Lee is silent regarding: the red pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) overlaps with the red optoelectronic element (120R, OLED_R, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081) along the thickness direction of the substrate (101, fig. 9) and additionally overlaps with at least one of the green optoelectronic element (120G, OLED_G, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081) or the blue optoelectronic element (120B, OLED_B, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), the green pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) overlaps with the green optoelectronic element (120G, OLED_G, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081) along the thickness direction of the substrate (101, fig. 9) and additionally overlaps with at least one of the red optoelectronic element (120R, OLED_R, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081) or the blue optoelectronic element (120B, OLED_B, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), and the blue pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) overlaps with the blue optoelectronic element (120B, OLED_B, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081) along the thickness direction of the substrate (101, fig. 9) and additionally overlaps with at least one of the red optoelectronic element (120R, OLED_R, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081) or the green optoelectronic element (120G, OLED_G, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081). Ke discloses optoelectronic elements (140a-140c, fig. 2H) electrically connect to pixel circuits (120a-120c, fig. 2H) are stacked each other along a thickness direction of the substrate (104, fig. 2H). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include a vertical stacked pixel circuit since stacking the pixel circuits can improve LED high-density integration. Re: Claim 3, Lee and Ke discloses all the limitations of claim 2 on which this claim depends. Lee is silent regarding: wherein the red pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) overlaps about 50% to about 100% of a total area of the red optoelectronic element (120R, OLED_R, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), the green optoelectronic element (120G, OLED_G, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), and the blue optoelectronic element (120B, OLED_B, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), the green pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) overlaps about 50% to about 100% of the total area of the red optoelectronic element (120R, OLED_R, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), the green optoelectronic element (120G, OLED_G, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), and the blue optoelectronic element (120B, OLED_B, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), and the blue pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) overlaps about 50% to about 100% of the total area of the red optoelectronic element (120R, OLED_R, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), the green optoelectronic element (120G, OLED_G, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), and the blue optoelectronic element (120B, OLED_B, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081). Ke discloses optoelectronic elements (140a-140c, fig. 2H) electrically connect to pixel circuits (120a-120c, fig. 2H) are stacked each other along a thickness direction of the substrate (104, fig. 2H). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include a vertical stacked pixel circuit since stacking the pixel circuits can improve LED high-density integration. Re: Claim 4, Lee and Ke discloses all the limitations of claim 1 on which this claim depends. Lee further discloses: wherein each active layer of the red pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9), the green pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9), and the blue pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) includes a two-dimensional material, oxide, silicon, an organic material, or a combination thereof (¶0098; for example active region transistor region uses gate insulating material such as organic insulating material). Re: Claim 8, Lee and Ke discloses all the limitations of claim 1 on which this claim depends. Lee further discloses: wherein each thickness of the red pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9), the green pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9), and the blue pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9). Lee is silent regarding: the thickness of pixel circuit is about 0.1 nanometers (nm) to about 3 micrometers (μm). However, thickness range would have been obvious to an ordinary artisan practicing the invention because, absent evidence of disclosure of criticality for the range giving unexpected results, it is not inventive to discover optimal or workable ranges by routine experimentation. In re Aller, 220 F.2d 454, 105 USPQ 223, 235 (CCPA 1955). Furthermore, the specification contains no disclosure of either the critical nature of the claimed dimensions of any unexpected results arising therefrom. Where patentability is aid to be based upon particular chosen dimensions or upon another variable recited in a claim, the applicant must show that the chosen dimensions are critical. See In re Woodruff, 919 F.2d 1575, 1578, 16 USPQ2sd 1934, 1936 (Fed. Cir. 1990). Re: Claim 9, Lee and Ke discloses all the limitations of claim 1 on which this claim depends. Lee further discloses: wherein the red pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9), the green pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9), and the blue pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) are separated by an insulation layer (PL and ILD3, fig. 9), and each of the red pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9), the green pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9), and the blue pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) is electrically connected to corresponding one of the red optoelectronic element (120R, OLED_R, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), the green optoelectronic element (120G, OLED_G, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), the blue optoelectronic element (120B, OLED_B, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081) through a conductive material filled in a via-hole (48, fig. 9) in the insulation layer (PL and ILD3, fig. 9). Re: Claim 10, Lee and Ke discloses all the limitations of claim 1 on which this claim depends. Lee further discloses: wherein the plurality of unit pixel circuits (fig. 6-8) includes a first unit pixel (10a, fig. 2) circuit (fig. 7-8) and a second unit pixel (10b, fig. 2) circuit (fig. 7-8) adjacent to each other in the thickness direction of the substrate (101, fig. 9), and the red pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9), the green pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9), and the blue pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) included in the first unit pixel (10a, fig. 2) circuit (fig. 7-8), and the red pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9), the green pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9), and the blue pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) included in the second unit pixel (10b, fig. 2) circuit (fig. 7-8). Lee is silent regarding: pixel circuits are stacked each other along the thickness direction of the substrate (101, fig. 9). Ke discloses optoelectronic elements (140a-140c, fig. 2H) electrically connect to pixel circuits (120a-120c, fig. 2H) are stacked each other along a thickness direction of the substrate (104, fig. 2H). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include a vertical stacked pixel circuit since stacking the pixel circuits can improve LED high-density integration. Re: Claim 11, Lee and Ke discloses all the limitations of claim 2 on which this claim depends. Lee further discloses: wherein the plurality of unit pixels (10a and 10b, fig. 1) includes a first unit pixel (10a, fig. 2) and a second unit pixel (10b, fig. 2) adjacent to each other, the red optoelectronic element (120R, OLED_R, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), the green optoelectronic element (120G, OLED_G, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), and the blue optoelectronic element (120B, OLED_B, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081) included the first unit pixel (10a, fig. 2), and the red optoelectronic element (120R, OLED_R, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), the green optoelectronic element (120G, OLED_G, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), and the blue optoelectronic element (120B, OLED_B, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081) included in the second unit pixel (10b, fig. 2) are arranged side by side along the direction parallel to the major surface of the substrate (101, fig. 9). Lee is silent regarding: the red pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) of the first unit pixel (10a, fig. 2) circuit (fig. 7-8) overlaps with about 50% to about 100% of a total area of the red optoelectronic element (120R, OLED_R, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), the green optoelectronic element (120G, OLED_G, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), and the blue optoelectronic element (120B, OLED_B, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081) included the first unit pixel (10a, fig. 2), and the red optoelectronic element (120R, OLED_R, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), the green optoelectronic element (120G, OLED_G, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), and the blue optoelectronic element (120B, OLED_B, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081) included in the second unit pixel (10b, fig. 2), the green pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) of the first unit pixel (10a, fig. 2) circuit (fig. 7-8) overlaps with about 50% to about 100% of the total area of the red optoelectronic element (120R, OLED_R, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), the green optoelectronic element (120G, OLED_G, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), and the blue optoelectronic element (120B, OLED_B, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081) included the first unit pixel (10a, fig. 2), and the red optoelectronic element (120R, OLED_R, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), the green optoelectronic element (120G, OLED_G, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), and the blue optoelectronic element (120B, OLED_B, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081) included in the second unit pixel (10b, fig. 2), and the blue pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) of the first unit pixel (10a, fig. 2) circuit (fig. 7-8) overlaps with about 50% to about 100% of the total area of the red optoelectronic element (120R, OLED_R, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), the green optoelectronic element (120G, OLED_G, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), and the blue optoelectronic element (120B, OLED_B, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081) included the first unit pixel (10a, fig. 2), and the red optoelectronic element (120R, OLED_R, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), the green optoelectronic element (120G, OLED_G, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), and the blue optoelectronic element (120B, OLED_B, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081) included in the second unit pixel (10b, fig. 2). Ke discloses optoelectronic elements (140a-140c, fig. 2H) electrically connect to pixel circuits (120a-120c, fig. 2H) are stacked each other along a thickness direction of the substrate (104, fig. 2H). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include a vertical stacked pixel circuit since stacking the pixel circuits can improve LED high-density integration. Re: Claim 12, Lee and Ke discloses all the limitations of claim 1 on which this claim depends. Lee further discloses: wherein each of the red optoelectronic element (120R, OLED_R, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), the green optoelectronic element (120G, OLED_G, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081), the blue optoelectronic element (120B, OLED_B, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081) is a light emitting diode or a photoelectric conversion diode, and each of the red pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9), the green pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9), and the blue pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) includes a switching thin film transistor (T2, fig. 9), a driving thin film transistor, a capacitor, or a combination thereof. Re: Claim 13, Lee and Ke discloses all the limitations of claim 1 on which this claim depends. Lee further discloses: a control circuit (T5, fig. 7) electrically connected to the plurality of unit pixel circuits (fig. 6-8), wherein the control circuit (T5, fig. 7) includes a driver integrated circuit (T1, fig. 7), and wherein the control circuit (T5, fig. 7) overlaps with the plurality of unit pixels (10a and 10b, fig. 1) and the plurality of unit pixel circuits (fig. 6-8) along the thickness direction of the substrate (101, fig. 9). Re: Independent Claim 15, Lee discloses a substrate (101, fig. 9), first, second and third optoelectronic elements (120R, OLED_R, 120G, OLED_G, 120B, OLED_B, fig. 6) positioned on the substrate (101, fig. 9), and configured to emit or absorb lights in a red wavelength spectrum, a green wavelength spectrum and a blue wavelength spectrum, respectively, a first insulation layer (PDL, fig. 9) positioned on the first, second, and third optoelectronic elements (120R, OLED_R, 120G, OLED_G, 120B, OLED_B, fig. 6), a first pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) positioned on the first insulation layer (PDL, fig. 9), and configured to control and drive the first optoelectronic element, a second insulation layer (PL and ILD3, fig. 9) positioned on the first pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9), a second pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) positioned on the second insulation layer (PL and ILD3, fig. 9), and configured to control and drive the second optoelectronic element, a third insulation layer (PL and ILD3, fig. 9) positioned on the second pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9), and a third pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) positioned on the third insulation layer (PL and ILD3, fig. 9), and configured to control and drive the third optoelectronic element. Lee is silent regarding: wherein the first pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) overlaps with the first optoelectronic element (120R, OLED_R, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081) along a thickness direction of the substrate (101, fig. 9) and additionally overlaps with at least one of the second optoelectronic element or the third optoelectronic element, the second pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) overlaps with the second optoelectronic element (120G, OLED_G, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081) along the thickness direction of the substrate (101, fig. 9) and additionally overlaps with at least one of the first optoelectronic element or the third optoelectronic element, and the third pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) overlaps with the third optoelectronic element (120B, OLED_B, fig. 6; ¶0080-¶0081) along the thickness direction of the substrate (101, fig. 9) and additionally overlaps with at least one of the first optoelectronic element or the second optoelectronic element. Ke discloses optoelectronic elements (140a-140c, fig. 2H) electrically connect to pixel circuits (120a-120c, fig. 2H) additionally overlaps with at least one of the optoelectronic element (140a-140c, fig. 2H) to each other along a thickness direction of the substrate (104, fig. 2H). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include a vertical stacked pixel circuit since stacking the pixel circuits can improve LED high-density integration. Re: Claim 16, Lee and Ke discloses all the limitations of claim 15 on which this claim depends. Lee is silent regarding: wherein the first pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) overlaps about 50% to about 100% of a total area of the first optoelectronic element, the second optoelectronic element, and the third optoelectronic element, the second pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) overlaps about 50% to about 100% of the total area of the first optoelectronic element, the second optoelectronic element, and the third optoelectronic element, and the third pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) overlaps about 50% to about 100% of the total area of the first optoelectronic element, the second optoelectronic element, and the third optoelectronic element. Ke discloses optoelectronic elements (140a-140c, fig. 2H) electrically connect to pixel circuits (120a-120c, fig. 2H) are stacked each other along a thickness direction of the substrate (104, fig. 2H). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include a vertical stacked pixel circuit since stacking the pixel circuits can improve LED high-density integration. Re: Claim 19, Lee and Ke discloses all the limitations of claim 15 on which this claim depends. Lee further discloses: a control circuit (T5, fig. 7) electrically connected to the first, second, and third pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9)s and including a driver integrated circuit (T1, fig. 7). Lee is silent regarding: the control circuit (T5, fig. 7) overlaps with the first, second, and third optoelectronic elements and the first, second, and third pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9)s along the thickness direction of the substrate (101, fig. 9). Ke discloses optoelectronic elements (140a-140c, fig. 2H) electrically connect to pixel circuits (120a-120c, fig. 2H) are stacked each other along a thickness direction of the substrate (104, fig. 2H). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include a vertical stacked pixel circuit since stacking the pixel circuits can improve LED high-density integration. Re: Claim 20, Lee and Ke discloses all the limitations of claim 1 on which this claim depends. Lee further discloses: an electronic device as shown in fig. 6 that including the panel (a sheet like display device as shown in figure 6-9) for the electronic device of claim 1. Claim(s) 5 is/are rejected under AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee US PG pub. 20140292622 A1; in view of Ke et al., US PG pub. 20190319080 A1; further in view of Robin et al., US PG pub. 20210193639 A1. Re: Claim 5, Lee and Ke discloses all the limitations of claim 4 on which this claim depends. Lee further discloses: wherein each active layer of the red pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9), the green pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9), and the blue pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9). Lee and Ke are silent regarding: active layer pixel circuit includes a monocrystalline or a monocrystalline-like two-dimensional material configured to be grown or deposited at temperatures from about 25°C to about 400°C. Robin discloses in a pixel circuit can include material such as monocrystalline in the pixel circuit (¶0091). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include a single crystal structure in pixel circuit since single crystal structure allows electrons to move freely and quickly without scattering thereby improve electron mobility allowing the circuit to drive high-performance display device like micro-LED. Lee, Ke and Robin did not disclose how the monocrystalline is made by grown or deposited at a specific temperature range, however, according to the MPEP, Section 2113, "Even though product-by-process claims are limited by and defined by the process, determination of patentability is based on the product itself. The patentability of a product does not depend on its method of production. If the product in the product-by-process claim is the same as or obvious from a product of the prior art, the claim is unpatentable even though the prior product was made by a different process”. In re Thorpe, 777 F.2d 695, 698, 227 USPQ 964, 966 (Fed. Cir. 1985). Claim(s) 6, 7, 14 and 17 is/are rejected under AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee US PG pub. 20140292622 A1; in view of Ke et al., US PG pub. 20190319080 A1; further in view of Zhao et al., US PG pub. 20230247890 A1. Re: Claim 6, Lee and Ke discloses all the limitations of claim 4 on which this claim depends. Lee and Ke are silent regarding: wherein the two-dimensional material includes a two-dimensional inorganic compound, graphene, borophene, germanene, stanene, phosphorene, bismuthene, tellurene, metal chalcogenide, boron nitride, black phosphorus, a two-dimensional organic compound, a two-dimensional organic/inorganic compound or combinations thereof. Zhao discloses the active layer display electrode are made of transparent graphene material (¶0083) which is a two-dimensional material. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include the active layer electrode to use transparent graphene material since graphene is flexible can prevent micro-cracking and electrical degradation which can ensure consistent emission efficiency. Re: Claim 7, Lee and Ke discloses all the limitations of claim 4 on which this claim depends. Lee and Ke are silent regarding: wherein each active layer of the red pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9), the green pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9), and the blue pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) includes 1 to 10 monolayers made of the two-dimensional material. Zhao discloses the active layer display electrode are made of transparent graphene material (¶0083) which is a two-dimensional material. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include the active layer electrode to use transparent graphene material since graphene is flexible can prevent micro-cracking and electrical degradation which can ensure consistent emission efficiency. Re: Claim 14, Lee and Ke discloses all the limitations of claim 13 on which this claim depends. Lee is silent regarding: wherein the control circuit (T5, fig. 7) includes a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) circuit including a two-dimensional material. Zhao discloses the active layer display electrode are made of transparent graphene material (¶0083) which is a two-dimensional material. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include the active layer electrode to use transparent graphene material since graphene is flexible can prevent micro-cracking and electrical degradation which can ensure consistent emission efficiency. Re: Claim 17, Lee and Ke discloses all the limitations of claim 15 on which this claim depends. Lee is silent regarding: wherein active layers of the first, second, and third pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9) include two-dimensional material, and a thickness of each of the first, second and third pixel circuit (as shown fig. 8 connected with pixel electrode 120, fig. 9)s is about 0.1 nm to about 3 μm. Zhao discloses the active layer display electrode are made of transparent graphene material (¶0083). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include the active layer electrode to use transparent graphene material since graphene is flexible can prevent micro-cracking and electrical degradation which can ensure consistent emission efficiency. Lee, Ke and Zhao are silent regarding: thickness of pixel circuit is about 0.1 nanometers (nm) to about 3 micrometers (μm). However, thickness range would have been obvious to an ordinary artisan practicing the invention because, absent evidence of disclosure of criticality for the range giving unexpected results, it is not inventive to discover optimal or workable ranges by routine experimentation. In re Aller, 220 F.2d 454, 105 USPQ 223, 235 (CCPA 1955). Furthermore, the specification contains no disclosure of either the critical nature of the claimed dimensions of any unexpected results arising therefrom. Where patentability is aid to be based upon particular chosen dimensions or upon another variable recited in a claim, the applicant must show that the chosen dimensions are critical. See In re Woodruff, 919 F.2d 1575, 1578, 16 USPQ2sd 1934, 1936 (Fed. Cir. 1990). Prior art made of record and not relied upon are considered pertinent to current application disclosure. * (“Ahmed et al., US PG pub. 20200395403 A1”) Discloses a micro light-emitting diode displays and methods of fabricating micro LED displays are described. In an example, a micro light emitting diode pixel structure includes a plurality of micro light emitting diode devices in a dielectric layer. A transparent conducting oxide layer is above the dielectric layer. A color conversion device (CCD) is above the transparent conducting oxide layer and over one of the plurality of micro light emitting diode devices. * (“Park et al., US PG pub. 20210175286 A1”) discloses an image sensor includes a first substrate having a first surface and a second surface opposite to the first surface. The first substrate includes an active pixel, region having a plurality of active pixels. A plurality of lower electrode structures is disposed on the second surface of the first substrate and corresponds to the plurality of active pixels, An upper electrode is disposed on the plurality of lower electrode structures. An organic photoelectric conversion layer is disposed between the plurality of lower electrode structures and the upper electrode. A second substrate is disposed on the first surface of the first substrate. A driving circuit configured to drive the plurality of active pixels is disposed on the second substrate. The plurality of lower electrode structures includes a first barrier layer, a reflective layer disposed on the first barrier layer and a second barrier layer disposed on the reflective layer. * (“Kitazawa et al., US PG pub. 20220376004 A1”) Discloses a light-emitting device includes, on a substrate, a red pixel electrode and a green pixel electrode, a common electrode, and a blue pixel electrode, in order from the substrate side, and includes a transparent region adjacent to a light-emitting region including a position overlapping the red light-emitting layer, the green light-emitting layer, and the blue light-emitting layer in a plan view. At least a part of the blue light-emitting layer overlaps the red light-emitting layer and the green light-emitting layer adjacent to the red light-emitting layer in the plan view. * (“Chaji US PG pub. 20130285537 A1”) discloses a high resolution active matrix display includes organic emissive layers of distinct colors each deposited across continuous regions so as to include more than one pixel emissive region. Color filters are situated to partially block light from at least some of the emissive regions such that primary additive colors are transmitted from distinct subsets of pixels. The emissive layers may be deposited in alternating parallel stripes along rows or columns of the display, or may be oriented perpendicularly with respect to one another such that the emissive layers overlap in the emissive regions of at least some pixels. In some examples, red, green, and blue of pixels are arranged in regular patterns across the display and with the emissive regions for the blue pixels forming a relatively larger area of the display than either the red or green pixels. Allowable Subject Matter 12-151-08 AIA 07-43 12-51-08 Claim (s) 18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Re: Claim 18, the prior art of record do not disclose or suggest, in combination with all other limitations in the claim : fourth, fifth and sixth optoelectronic elements positioned adjacent to the first, second and third optoelectronic elements along the direction parallel to a major surface of the substrate, and configured to emit or absorb lights in the red wavelength spectrum, green wavelength spectrum, or blue wavelength spectrum, respectively, a fourth insulation layer positioned on the third pixel circuit, a fourth pixel circuit positioned on the fourth insulation layer, and configured to control and drive the fourth optoelectronic element, a fifth insulation layer positioned on the fourth pixel circuit, a fifth pixel circuit positioned on the fifth insulation layer, and configured to control and drive the fifth optoelectronic element, a sixth insulation layer positioned on the fifth pixel circuit, and a sixth pixel circuit positioned on the sixth insulation layer, and configured to control and drive the sixth optoelectronic element, wherein the first pixel circuit, the second pixel circuit, and the third pixel circuit each further overlap with at least one of the fourth optoelectronic element, the fifth optoelectronic element or the sixth optoelectronic element along the thickness direction of the substrate, the fourth pixel circuit overlaps with the fourth optoelectronic element along the thickness direction of the substrate and additionally overlaps with at least one of the first optoelectronic element, the second optoelectronic element, the third optoelectronic element, the fifth optoelectronic element, or the sixth optoelectronic element, the fifth pixel circuit overlaps with the fifth optoelectronic element along the thickness direction of the substrate and additionally overlaps with at least one of the first optoelectronic element, the second optoelectronic element, the third optoelectronic element, the fourth optoelectronic element, or the sixth optoelectronic element, and the sixth pixel circuit overlaps with the sixth optoelectronic element along the thickness direction of the substrate and additionally overlaps with at least one of the first optoelectronic element, the second optoelectronic element, the third optoelectronic element, the fourth optoelectronic element, or the fifth optoelectronic element. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TSZ CHIU whose telephone number is 571-272-8656. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F, 9:00AM to 5:00PM (EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at https://www.uspto.gov/patent/uspto-automated-interview-request-air-form.html. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Leonard Chang can be reached on 571-270-3691. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TSZ K CHIU/Examiner, Art Unit 2898 Tsz.Chiu@uspto.gov /Leonard Chang/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2898 Application/Control Number: 18/653,130 Page 2 Art Unit: 2898 Application/Control Number: 18/653,130 Page 3 Art Unit: 2898 Application/Control Number: 18/653,130 Page 4 Art Unit: 2898 Application/Control Number: 18/653,130 Page 5 Art Unit: 2898 Application/Control Number: 18/653,130 Page 6 Art Unit: 2898 Application/Control Number: 18/653,130 Page 7 Art Unit: 2898 Application/Control Number: 18/653,130 Page 8 Art Unit: 2898 Application/Control Number: 18/653,130 Page 9 Art Unit: 2898 Application/Control Number: 18/653,130 Page 10 Art Unit: 2898 Application/Control Number: 18/653,130 Page 11 Art Unit: 2898 Application/Control Number: 18/653,130 Page 12 Art Unit: 2898 Application/Control Number: 18/653,130 Page 13 Art Unit: 2898 Application/Control Number: 18/653,130 Page 14 Art Unit: 2898 Application/Control Number: 18/653,130 Page 15 Art Unit: 2898 Application/Control Number: 18/653,130 Page 16 Art Unit: 2898 Application/Control Number: 18/653,130 Page 17 Art Unit: 2898 Application/Control Number: 18/653,130 Page 18 Art Unit: 2898 Application/Control Number: 18/653,130 Page 19 Art Unit: 2898 Application/Control Number: 18/653,130 Page 20 Art Unit: 2898 Application/Control Number: 18/653,130 Page 21 Art Unit: 2898 Application/Control Number: 18/653,130 Page 22 Art Unit: 2898 Application/Control Number: 18/653,130 Page 23 Art Unit: 2898 Application/Control Number: 18/653,130 Page 24 Art Unit: 2898
Prosecution Insights