Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 05, 2026
Application No. 18/653,141

POLYMERIC ELECTROLYTIC TILT SENSOR AND METHOD FOR MAKING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
May 02, 2024
Examiner
BENNETT, GEORGE B
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
The Fredricks Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
433 granted / 544 resolved
+19.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
553
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
55.3%
+15.3% vs TC avg
§102
13.9%
-26.1% vs TC avg
§112
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 544 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1, lines 5-6: “the exterior” lacks antecedent basis. Please clarify. Claim 1, lines 5-6: the phrase “extending into the exterior” is also unclear because it is unclear where the electrodes extend from. It appears that the “at least two electrodes” extend to the exterior from the interior chamber. Please clarify. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Barsky et al. (US Pat. No. 6,249,984). Barsky et al. discloses: An electrolytic tilt sensor (FIGS 1-4), comprising: a containment envelope 22 integrally fabricated from a material having at least three apertures 36, 38 formed therein and defining an interior chamber 28; an electrolytic solution 30 partially filling the chamber; and at least two electrodes 32, 34, each electrode having an electrically active portion extending into the exterior of the envelope through a corresponding aperture. Barsky et al. also discloses a header 26 and cap 24 as claimed. Barsky et al. does not specifically disclose that the containment envelope is fabricated from a polymer material as claimed. However, Barsky et al. does suggest that the containment envelope may be at least partially formed with a polymer (see col. 7, ll. 36-39) as an alternative to the metal envelope. Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to use any of the claimed polymers in conjunction with the envelope of Barsky et al. based on end user and/or manufacturer preferences. Regarding method claims 9-18, the methods as claimed will be performed when an electrolytic tilt sensor as claimed is constructed in accordance with the specification of Barsky et al. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to G. BRADLEY BENNETT whose telephone number is 571.272.2237. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH, 8:00-6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter Macchiarolo can be reached at 571.272.2375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571.273.8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866.217.9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800.786.9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571.272.1000. /GEORGE B BENNETT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855 gbb 11 JUN 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 02, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12669328
CONSTRUCTION SURFACE FLATNESS DETECTOR
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663250
EVIDENCE STORAGE SYSTEM
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12663264
In-Place Inclinometer
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12656117
ELECTRONIC DEVICE, CALIBRATION METHOD AND PROGRAM
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12650288
TAPE MEASURING STRAP WITH CUSTOM MARKINGS SHOWING THE POSITIONING OF VARIOUS COMPONENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION APPLICATION
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+10.7%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 544 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month