Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/653,291

Parametric Qubit Reset Using Lossy Multimode Cavity

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 02, 2024
Examiner
SKIBINSKI, TOMI SWEET
Art Unit
2836
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Google LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
750 granted / 894 resolved
+15.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
8 currently pending
Career history
904
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
53.3%
+13.3% vs TC avg
§102
26.7%
-13.3% vs TC avg
§112
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 894 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-6, 12, 14-17, 19, and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over McEwen et al (“Resisting high-energy impact events through gap engineering in superconducting qubit arrays”) in view of Bengtsson (“Parametric frequency conversion in two coupled superconducting resonators”). Regarding claim 1, McEwen discloses a reset circuit [Figure 1; Abstract] comprising: wherein the resonator structure [Figure S1] comprises a superconducting material characterized by a superconducting energy gap [supplementary material page 4 column 1; page 2 column 1] wherein an energy corresponding to the first frequency is below the superconducting energy gap, and an energy corresponding to the second frequency is above the superconducting energy gap [Table S3; page 2 column 1; page 4 column 1] McEwen does not explicitly disclose a resonator structure configured to resonate at a first frequency and a second frequency a frequency converter configured to convert an excitation of the resonator structure from the first frequency to the second frequency Bengtsson discloses a resonator structure configured to resonate at a first frequency and a second frequency [Section 2.3 and Section 2.3.1] a frequency converter configured to convert an excitation of the resonator structure from the first frequency to the second frequency [Section 2.3 and Section 2.3.1] Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have included first and second frequencies and a frequency converter as taught by Bengtsson in the circuit of McEwen for the purpose of improving the frequency control. Regarding claim 2, the combination of McEwen and Bengtsson, as applied to claim 1, discloses wherein the frequency converter comprises a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) [Section 2.3 Bengtsson]. Regarding claim 3, the combination of McEwen and Bengtsson, as applied to claim 1, discloses wherein the frequency converter comprises a parametric coupler [Section 2.3 Bengtsson]. Regarding claim 4, the combination of McEwen and Bengtsson, as applied to claim 3, discloses wherein the parametric coupler is configured to parametrically couple a fundamental frequency of the resonator structure with a harmonic frequency of the resonator structure [Section 2.3.1 Bengtsson; Abstract Bengtsson]. Regarding claim 5, the combination of McEwen and Bengtsson, as applied to claim 1, discloses a flux circuit configured to apply a flux pulse to the frequency converter [Figure 3.2 Bengtsson]. Regarding claim 6, the combination of McEwen and Bengtsson, as applied to claim 5, discloses wherein the flux circuit is configured to apply an oscillatory pump pulse to the frequency converter [Section 2.3 Bengtsson]. Regarding claim 12, McEwen discloses a method for resetting a qubit [Figure 1; Abstract], comprising: swapping an excitation of the qubit into a reset circuit to provide a swapped excitation [Figure 1; Abstract] wherein the resonator structure [Figure S1] comprises a superconducting material characterized by a superconducting energy gap [supplementary material page 4 column 1; page 2 column 1] wherein an energy corresponding to the first frequency is below the superconducting energy gap, and an energy corresponding to the second frequency is above the superconducting energy gap [Table S3; page 2 column 1; page 4 column 1] McEwen does not explicitly disclose wherein the reset circuit comprises a resonator structure configured to resonate at a first frequency and a second frequency a frequency converter configured to convert an excitation of the resonator structure from the first frequency to the second frequency converting the swapped excitation to the second frequency Bengtsson discloses wherein the reset circuit comprises a resonator structure configured to resonate at a first frequency and a second frequency [Section 2.3 and Section 2.3.1] a frequency converter configured to convert an excitation of the resonator structure from the first frequency to the second frequency [Section 2.3 and Section 2.3.1] Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have included first and second frequencies and a frequency converter as taught by Bengtsson in the method of McEwen for the purpose of improving the frequency control. Regarding claim 14, the combination of McEwen and Bengtsson, as applied to claim 12, discloses wherein the frequency converter comprises a parametric coupler configured to parametrically couple a fundamental frequency of the resonator structure with a harmonic frequency of the resonator structure, and converting the swapped excitation comprises activating a coupling between the fundamental frequency and the harmonic frequency [Section 2.3.1 Bengtsson; Abstract Bengtsson]. Regarding claim 15, the combination of McEwen and Bengtsson, as applied to claim 14, discloses wherein activating a coupling comprises applying a flux pulse [Figure 3.2 Bengtsson]. Regarding claim 16, the combination of McEwen and Bengtsson, as applied to claim 15, discloses wherein the flux pulse is an oscillatory pump pulse [Section 2.3 Bengtsson]. Regarding claim 17, the combination of McEwen and Bengtsson, as applied to claim 16, discloses wherein the oscillatory pump pulse has an oscillation frequency within 10 percent of a difference between the first frequency and the second frequency [Section 4.2 Bengtsson]. Regarding claim 19, the combination of McEwen and Bengtsson, as applied to claim 12, discloses wherein the frequency converter comprises a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) [Section 2.3 Bengtsson]. Regarding claim 20, McEwen discloses a quantum computing system [Abstract], comprising: a plurality of qubits [page 2 column 2; Abstract] a quantum logic circuit configured to perform one or more quantum operations on the plurality of qubits [Abstract] at least one reset circuit [Figure 1; Abstract] wherein the resonator structure [Figure S1] comprises a superconducting material characterized by a superconducting energy gap [supplementary material page 4 column 1; page 2 column 1] wherein an energy corresponding to the first frequency is below the superconducting energy gap, and an energy corresponding to the second frequency is above the superconducting energy gap [Table S3; page 2 column 1; page 4 column 1] McEwen does not explicitly disclose a resonator structure configured to resonate at a first frequency and a second frequency a frequency converter configured to convert an excitation of the resonator structure from the first frequency to the second frequency Bengtsson discloses a resonator structure configured to resonate at a first frequency and a second frequency [Section 2.3 and Section 2.3.1] a frequency converter configured to convert an excitation of the resonator structure from the first frequency to the second frequency [Section 2.3 and Section 2.3.1] Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have included first and second frequencies and a frequency converter as taught by Bengtsson in the circuit of McEwen for the purpose of improving the frequency control. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7-11, 13, and 18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Tomi S Skibinski whose telephone number is (571)270-7581. The examiner can normally be reached Mon. - Thurs. 8am - 6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Regis Betsch can be reached at (571)270-7101. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TOMI SKIBINSKI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 02, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12763742
INCREASING DIGITAL POWER AMPLIFIER EFFICIENCY BY REUSING DRIVER CURRENT
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12750061
PHASE-LOCKED LOOP DEVICE, AND OPERATING METHOD OF THE DEVICE
1y 12m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743121
SEGMENT CLOCK GATING
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738926
ELECTRONIC CONTROL UNIT AND GATE DRIVING METHOD OF POWER SEMICONDUCTOR ELEMENT
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738932
TEMPERATURE MEASURING CIRCUIT
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+3.4%)
1y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 894 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month