Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/653,309

LATERAL MASS FIXATION IMPLANT

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
May 02, 2024
Examiner
HARVEY, JULIANNA NANCY
Art Unit
3773
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Providence Medical Technology Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 12m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
937 granted / 1199 resolved
+8.1% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 12m
Avg Prosecution
58 currently pending
Career history
1257
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
§103
36.2%
-3.8% vs TC avg
§102
28.3%
-11.7% vs TC avg
§112
24.0%
-16.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1199 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on November 26, 2025 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 11 recites “a insertion configuration” (lines 1-2) and “a deployed configuration” (lines 2-3). However, claim 1 already recites “an insertion configuration and a deployed configuration” (lines 5-6). Thus, it is unclear whether the recitations in claim 11 are intended to refer to a second, or additional, insertion configuration and a second, or additional, deployed configuration or are intended to refer to the insertion configuration and the deployed configuration recited in claim 1. For examination purposes, the Examiner is interpreting claim 11 as reciting “the insertion configuration” (lines 1-2) and “the deployed configuration” (lines 2-3). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 7, 11, and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Farris (US 2007/0135814 A1). Claim 1. Farris discloses a spinal implant system, comprising: a facet implant member (intermediate section 30) for positioning in a facet joint (see para. 0018); and a lateral mass fixation portion (first section 21 and second section 22) comprising two tabs (first section 21 and second section 22) extending from the facet implant member wherein the tabs transition between an insertion configuration (see Figs. 5A-5B) and a deployed configuration (see Figs. 2-4) and in the deployed configuration, the tabs contact lateral masses of adjacent vertebrae (see Fig. 4) (Figs. 2-5B; paras. 0016-0021). Claim 7. Farris discloses wherein the tabs have one or more holes (apertures 23) formed therethrough to receive one or more fixation devices (screws 41) configured to secure the tabs to the lateral masses of adjacent vertebrae (see para. 0016) (Figs. 2-5B; paras. 0016-0021). Claim 11. Farris discloses wherein the tabs are moveable from the insertion configuration for delivery of the system in a patient to the deployed configuration for attachment to lateral masses of adjacent vertebrae, wherein the tabs are positioned at a first angle (as shown in Figs. 5A-5B) relative to the implant member in the insertion configuration and at a second angle (as shown in Figs. 2-3) relative to the implant member in the deployed configuration and the first angle and the second angle are different (Figs. 2-5B; paras. 0016-0021). Claim 12. Farris discloses a guide member (tube 80) for guiding the facet implant member to a spine for attachment thereto (see para. 0019) (Figs. 2-5B; paras. 0016-0021). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim 1 and McCormack have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JULIANNA N HARVEY whose telephone number is (571)270-3815. The examiner can normally be reached Mon.-Fri. 8:00am-5:00pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo Robert can be reached at (571)272-4719. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JULIANNA N HARVEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3773
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 02, 2024
Application Filed
May 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Aug 11, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 22, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §112
Nov 26, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 15, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599411
ROD FOR SPINAL BRACE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599412
INTRA-OPERATIVE OPTIONS FOR SMART IMPLANTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12582451
Active Compression Devices, Methods Of Assembly And Methods Of Use
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12569279
POP-ON-CAP ASSEMBLIES HAVING OPPOSING SPLAY-RESISTING FEATURES AND GENERALLY REACTANGULAR OPPOSING ROTATION-PREVENTING/ROTATION-RESISTING FEATURES FOR SPINAL SURGERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12557977
SMARTPHONE DENTAL IMAGING ATTACHMENT APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+19.0%)
2y 12m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1199 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month