Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/653,854

DENTAL FLOSS PRODUCT PACKAGING AND DISPENSING APPARATUS, SYSTEM AND METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 02, 2024
Examiner
RUIZ MARTIN, LUIS MIGUEL
Art Unit
3772
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
5W Consulting LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
46%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 46% of resolved cases
46%
Career Allow Rate
47 granted / 103 resolved
-24.4% vs TC avg
Strong +51% interview lift
Without
With
+51.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
133
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
44.7%
+4.7% vs TC avg
§102
24.0%
-16.0% vs TC avg
§112
26.4%
-13.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 103 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 04/24/2025 was filed after the mailing date of the application on 05/02/2024. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-8 in the reply filed on 04/04/2024 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4 and 7-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by McConnell (US 6302121 B1). Regarding claim 1, McConnell discloses a dental floss dispenser (Abstract and Figure 1) comprising: a refillable dental floss case (10) having internal surfaces forming a bobbin cavity (28); and a flanged bobbin (74) containing dental floss; wherein said dental floss flanged bobbin is in rotatable contact with one or more of said internal surfaces of said bobbin cavity, such that said dental floss may be freely dispensed from said dental floss dispenser (col 4, lines 25-27). Regarding claim 2, McConnell discloses wherein said refillable dental floss case (10) comprises: a case body (12); and a case lid (22) hingedly attached to said case body (12); wherein said case lid has an open position and a closed position (Figures 4-5 and col 3, lines 38-53). Regarding claim 3, McConnell discloses said refillable dental floss case further comprises: a retractable hinge portion (18); and a hinge retaining clip (46), wherein said retractable hinge portion (18) releasably engages said hinge retaining clip (46) to allow access to said bobbin cavity (28) (Figure 4, col 3, lines 14-25 and 38-42). Regarding claim 4, McConnell discloses wherein said refillable dental floss case is of unitary construction (col 3, line 25). Regarding claim 7, McConnell discloses wherein said retractable hinge portion (18) comprises a cutter (38) for detaching a length of said dental floss dispensed from said flanged bobbin (Figure 4 and col 4, lines 1-3). Regarding claim 8, McConnell discloses said retractable hinge portion (18) having a floss clearance gap (see exit hole in Figure 4) therein. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 5-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over McConnell as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Kim (US 20120234889 A1). Regarding claim 5, McConnell discloses wherein said flanged bobbin (74) comprises a quill portion (86), said quill portion (86) having a cavity therethrough, and said quill cavity having an interior surface (since the quill 86 of the floss carrier preferably rests on the spindle 24 of the housing 12; see col 4, lines 28-29). However, McConnell fails to specifically disclose “wherein said flanged bobbin comprises a quill portion between two flanged portions”. Kim discloses a dental floss dispenser (Abstract and Figure 1) comprising: a refillable dental floss case (100) having internal surfaces forming a bobbin cavity (30); and a flanged bobbin (50) containing dental floss; wherein said flanged bobbin comprises a quill portion (53) between two flanged portions (55a and 55b). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of the application, to modify McConnell’s flanged bobbin to make it comprising said quill portion between two flanged portions, as taught by Kim, since such modification would be a case of applying a known technique to a known device (floss bobbin) ready for improvement to yield predictable results (i.e. providing the bobbing with well-defined sidewalls that would prevent the floss from spinning out of the quill). Regarding claim 6, McConnell fails to disclose “wherein said dental floss case is not in contact with said interior surface of said quill cavity”. Kim discloses a dental floss dispenser (Abstract and Figure 1) comprising: a flanged bobbin (50) containing dental floss; wherein said flanged bobbin comprises a quill portion (53) between two flanged portions (55a and 55b). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art, before the effective filing date of the application, to modify McConnell’s flanged bobbin to make it comprising said quill portion between two flanged portions, as taught by Kim, since such modification would be a case of applying a known technique to a known device (floss bobbin) ready for improvement to yield predictable results (i.e. providing the bobbing with well-defined sidewalls that would prevent the floss from spinning out of the quill). Therefore, McConnell and Kim, as combined above, discloses wherein said dental floss case is not in contact with said interior surface of said quill cavity (since the floss in contained between two flanged portions, as taught by Kim). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Spencer (US 5156311 A) Heneveld (US 5415187 A) Kwon (KR 200169429 Y1) Blasi (US 20050000538 A1) Kim (US 20120234889 A1) Kim (KR 20140044352 A) Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LUIS MIGUEL RUIZ MARTIN whose telephone number is (571)270-0839. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8 Am - 5 PM (EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eric Rosen can be reached on (571) 270-7855. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LUIS RUIZ MARTIN/ Examiner, Art Unit 3772 /ERIC J ROSEN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3772
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 02, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599465
TOOTH ROOT CANAL IRRIGATION ASSEMBLY FOR CLEANING TOOTH ROOT CANALS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12551321
DENTAL INTRAORAL DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12544191
MICRO-MAGNETIC INVISIBLE ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12520894
GESTURE AND ARTICULATION OF A COSMETIC APPLICATOR WITH A SPRING OR COMPRESSED CLAMPING MECHANISM
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12507782
PERSONAL DEFENSE TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
46%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+51.1%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 103 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month